Dozens bet selection

[crackers]

Because you can't come up with anything on
your own.

Poor squat for brains Spike. He claims he never shared anything with me ever. Now I
got all my BS from him. What a conflicting situation now that this now exists. I'm not
done attempting to share. I'm just going to find a way that brings home my points.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

For roulette, yes.

What is your definition or an example then as "non-random?"

[cheese]

I'm just going to find a way that brings home my points.

Well, you've proven over and over that actually using
real spins doesn't work. What else is left.

[cheese]

What is your definition or an example then as "non-random?"

Go here and use this applet.

nolinks://nolinks.gametheory.net/mike/applets/random/random.html

It will tell you how well you understand random outcomes.
I always do 100% on this test, BTW. Gizmo will now say
he does too! No, he doesn't.

[crackers]

Well, you've proven over and over that actually using
real spins doesn't work. What else is left.

That's nice smart guy. Was it only today that these demos and contests prove
nothing. I guess you are one of those selective experts that only sounds like
excrament when it pleases you.

[crackers]

Go here and use this applet.

nolinks://nolinks.gametheory.net/mike/applets/random/random.html

It will tell you how well you understand random outcomes.
I always do 100% on this test, BTW. Gizmo will now say
he does too! No, he doesn't.

Poor cheese. He's got to prove he's the king of randomness.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Go here and use this applet.

nolinks://nolinks.gametheory.net/mike/applets/random/random.html

It will tell you how well you understand random outcomes.
I always do 100% on this test, BTW. Gizmo will now say
he does too! No, he doesn't.

Interesting.  You are the anti-pattern!, which is what roulette produces the majority of the time.

[crackers]

This should be made note of here. Spike said he would never share anything. But
he just did. I guess I applied enough pressure that he had to bring something to
the table. If you have been around for years then you would know that Spike and
Gizmotron have been discussing randomness for over five years. I came to the
conclusion that Spike was playing a very short termed form of observation. It's
all there at GG. I went at randomness looking for things that continue. This is a
phenomenon of characteristics that tend to be the exception when it comes to
random. It is clear to me that Spike does not see chaos. That is what I thought
he was good at. Anyone that looks at roulette charts knows that things that
continue are fragmented among areas of the charts that don't. But now I know
that there must be characteristics that make it possible to read the parts of
randomness that have always looked chaotic to me. I just ignored these conditions.
It is no wonder why Spike has reacted to what I have shared. He has all but declared
that it is baloney while at the same time claiming that I got it from him by stealing it.

I now see where he gets "thinking in random." Thanks for sharing. Now was that all that
bad? So now I will find the characteristics of the things that don't appear to be in a
condition of continuing. The charts are  strewn with these conditions all the time.

With regards to this form of looking at randomness, I will not be sharing information
that I figure out. This is Spikes domain. It's up to him and how dangerous it might be
to discuss it. But now that I know where to look it shouldn't be that difficult.

[cheese]

With regards to this form of looking at randomness, I will not be sharing information
that I figure out.

Oh no. But when you consider that almost everybody in the
contest was way ahead of you when you sprained your brain
and had to drop out, I don't think anybody cares if you share
or not.

[crackers]

Oh no. But when you consider that almost everybody in the
contest was way ahead of you when you sprained your brain
and had to drop out, I don't think anybody cares if you share
or not.

FINE, BE A FORKING ICE HOLE. I was willing to give you respect for sharing. Now you
get no regards whatsoever.  My first inclination is to test the absence of the trend
condition. BTW dick - it's impossible for randomness to stop being random on a
fare wheel. Any observation of an opportunity therefore must be thinking random.
Your grand achievement is only an achievement in semantics.

[crackers]

For the record, my follow the trend technique includes attacking the opportunities
with much bigger bets. I didn't get to that stage. But that never stopped Spike from
being MOTHER Bi*ch This total clown of a man thinks he's got the upper hand. If
anyone here respects that then so be it.

[cheese]

But that never stopped Spike from
being MOTHER Bi*ch This total clown of a man thinks he's got the upper hand. If
anyone here respects that then so be it.

Odd that your 'heart condition' made you drop out
of the contest, but you can still fly into a rage with
no problems. Shouldn't you be lying down and
conserving your strength? Almost makes me think
you dropped out because you're clueless about
roulette.

[crackers]

Odd that your 'heart condition' made you drop out
of the contest, but you can still fly into a rage with
no problems. Shouldn't you be lying down and
conserving your strength? Almost makes me think
you dropped out because you're clueless about
roulette.

I'm not in rage. I'm dealing with an insignificant fuk stick. I do this at my leisure.

[cheese]

I'm not in rage. I'm dealing with an insignificant fuk stick. I do this at my leisure.

After seeing how chipper and feisty you are today,
I'm starting to believe you dropped out of the
contest because you were hopelessly behind.

No, wait, I believed that already. In fact I predicted
it in a PM to Bombus.

Never mind.

[Mr J]

Please fellas. 


Ken

[Mr J]

-