A MUCH better (and easier) method on individual numbers

Dane · October 20, 2012, 12:58:02 PM

That´s right, Sam! :yes:THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGING! But it is also true that slow and steady wins the race!

XX X X0X0X0
XX X
X
A very systematic procedure should be tested in a very systematic way too. As you know, I had luck testing my method at home with spins from yesteryear. I´ll continue too!
Dane

Loek2000 · October 21, 2012, 05:30:54 AM

Respect Dane for your system. I like the way how you solve the endless counting issue. Time is a factor. Numbers being due not. So the key is not predicting but creating a small enough opening the get a hit and not to get bust isn't it? I like to test your system. I'm not sure if I get the whole picture. I do not have cat food pellets ;-) Why in your example of 17 October do you only bet downwards? "11, 24, 5. Start betting on 17" why not the 0 as well? "...12. Add 18 to your betting." why not the 6 as well? It would complement the string of XOXOX even more. I would like to understand. I like your fresh approach on patterns. I have tried many of them and the more I test them the more I belief it's better not to be rigid. Be as chaotic as chaos. So pick 6 random numbers play even money 6 times. Win, nice. Lose? +1 in the next 6 numbers until you get even again. It will work for a while and then the ivory ball will jump on other numbers for ages. But your approach gives me hope again. Keep up the good work.

Dane · October 21, 2012, 09:24:43 AM

To Loek2000. Thanks for your friendly letter. Listen to "Ebony and Ivory" - but do not believe that the ball in roulette is an ivory ball these days.
Listen to "Love Minus Zero" - but do not expect me to add Zero to my betting. I have chosen to concentrate on 1-36. Patterns inside 12X3 spaces. How to mark the numbers is entirely up to you. I use to draw small circles ("chips"). If I leave a number before the session has ended, I fill out the circle in its space.
Study the examples in reply #7 closely! Use pen, paper and spaces!
X0X0X
If only 12 and 24 have come in the 3rd column, I bet on 18.
Not 6. And why not? And why not? Before long I would place too many chips.
Hopefully we have some orderliness in our brains! It is better than chaos! Dane

TwoCatSam · October 21, 2012, 09:59:30 AM

I have moved on from dog food pellets.

I created my own chart and had it laminated. I use a wet erase marker to make my Xs. When it's time, I erase the whole sheet.

Sam

Loek2000 · October 21, 2012, 06:33:17 PM

Hello Dane. Thanks for taking the time to explain. I get it. I will start testing tomorrow. Your quite the philosopher. I respect that. The truth is that we can't understand chaos because we create order with our brain even if it's not there. On the other hand there is so much order in things we cannot see because of lack in consciousness. For example to understand reasons and patterns in major events in our live. Anyway it's not practical in roulette for as far as I can see. I have a friend whom I study for years now. She has never lost in roulette! Never! She only plays in landbased casino's and at forehand she tells me how much she is gonna win. She always start with 50 euros. If she needs a new television she will stop when she's got 1000 euro. And she succeeds. When she does not get the right "fibe" she does not play and goes home without playing. I have seen her doing that for over 20 years now. She looks at patterns and plays one number or the last double street. I cannot understand how she reads the patterns, but apparently she can. Me being a simple soul have to relate to more ridged patterns like XOXOX. But it still is interesting. I wonder what else we could look at to get a bit more conformation. Like how many repeaters are there and so what? Or is it an idea to look for the XOXOX pattern on the roulette wheel instead of the layout? Have you investigated this?

Twocatsam, your funny! And smart idea with the sheet. I have a 37 inch monitor and use Excel on one half and Roulette on the other side. This way I can "write" and use formulas in one go. I like the simplicity of your idea though. My be I'll give that a try too.

TwoCatSam · October 22, 2012, 12:41:05 AM

Thank you, Loek. It is very important to me to have my ducks in a row!

Loek2000 · October 22, 2012, 04:53:32 AM

Twocatsam, you've got something with animals don't you? Bring us the golden goose and I'll thank you with a silver donkey.

jovica15 · October 22, 2012, 05:40:28 AM

Dane: "Timing is essential to all gambling. The number of spins in one session also stops, if any street or any corner has appeared with all its numbers."

With this you mean when spining and waiting for pattern to show?
Or, also when you are already betting on one or two numbers? How can you achive betting for 20 spins?

Dane · October 22, 2012, 07:23:35 AM

To Loek2000: Clara Clairavoyant and your likeminded female friend ought to be in the Precognition and Telekinesis department of this Forum! No, I have not looked at the roulette wheel. You wonder what else we could look at. Keep on wondering. But please understand that I must focus attention. I do not want to start all over again in the middle of my long test series.

To Jovica15: I mentioned 20 spins in an earlier topic - but not in this one. I got bored with counting number of spins. Now I simply end the session if any of the patterns comes. A session might be longer or shorter. If you are visiting a casino and you have a train to catch, it is good to know how many sessions you can complete. Better safe than sorry. Within 120 spins you should be able to complete at least four sessions. It is stressfull to fight against TIME.
Dane

seykid29 · October 22, 2012, 08:41:18 AM

Quote from: Loek2000 on October 21, 2012, 06:33:17 PM
Hello Dane. Thanks for taking the time to explain. I get it. I will start testing tomorrow. Your quite the philosopher. I respect that. The truth is that we can't understand chaos because we create order with our brain even if it's not there. On the other hand there is so much order in things we cannot see because of lack in consciousness. For example to understand reasons and patterns in major events in our live. Anyway it's not practical in roulette for as far as I can see. I have a friend whom I study for years now. She has never lost in roulette! Never! She only plays in landbased casino's and at forehand she tells me how much she is gonna win. She always start with 50 euros. If she needs a new television she will stop when she's got 1000 euro. And she succeeds. When she does not get the right "fibe" she does not play and goes home without playing. I have seen her doing that for over 20 years now. She looks at patterns and plays one number or the last double street. I cannot understand how she reads the patterns, but apparently she can. Me being a simple soul have to relate to more ridged patterns like XOXOX. But it still is interesting. I wonder what else we could look at to get a bit more conformation. Like how many repeaters are there and so what? Or is it an idea to look for the XOXOX pattern on the roulette wheel instead of the layout? Have you investigated this?

Twocatsam, your funny! And smart idea with the sheet. I have a 37 inch monitor and use Excel on one half and Roulette on the other side. This way I can "write" and use formulas in one go. I like the simplicity of your idea though. My be I'll give that a try too.

I can relate a little with the vibe thing,but its more about a little experience and reading the game.As some know im a fan of Kimo Li GPM and using stars strategy i can be accurate with numbers 75% of time.Like some may say,maybe its luck

or

it isnt.

Loek2000 · October 22, 2012, 02:20:35 PM

Excuse me Dane if I got carried away. I just meant to agree that patterns could be readable. Nothing out of the ordinary. I played 27 games today. RNG. It takes a long time to get some winnings because most games ended quickly in a full carre of full street. Nothing to show for on the plus side. I give it another go. I'll try the wheel instead of the layout.

seykid29 "Kimo Li GPM and using stars strategy " thanks mate. I'll investigate. Lets not discuss it here out of respect to Dane. Good on you.

Dane · October 23, 2012, 04:30:53 AM

Loek2000: I prefer REAL WHEELS. Without double zero. And it might be hard to seach for X0X0X wheel-pattern and at the same time keep an eye on patterns in streets and corners.
It is possible to play for months without winning much. Dane

Loek2000 · October 23, 2012, 06:15:04 AM

Yep, played reel wheel last night. +64 euros. And your right, the layout is better because it takes longer on the wheel to get the pattern. And no safety without the carre of street stops. Thanks for the feedback.

TwoCatSam · October 23, 2012, 10:02:03 AM

As to Kimo Li......without being disrespectful.......if anyone could start a thread and ACTUALLY SAY SOMETHING meaningful about one of his ideas, I'd fall over. Just giving names to things will not a winning system make.

I'm talking on the order of Mr J, who does not bloviate and obfuscate. Name one system using Mr. Li's namings and show how and when to bet. "Oh, I bet the Stars.." won't get it. Someone said every number is a Star.

Yes, you can bet a "bow tie" or a "nuke" (I have his books.) but all you're doing is betting locations on the wheel. Warmed over Gamlet.

Sorry, Dane, but someone brought up Kimo Li.

Sam

Dane · October 23, 2012, 12:53:28 PM

Back to my system, both cats: As you know, I had luck in my test series at home with Permanenzen from YEASTERYEAR, Table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden. In my continued test I fought my way through the lists from January and February this year. At this point my "profit" had dropped to 550 chips. There is nothing like stating the obvious: In a long test series we should expect set backs; and we need many chips. Especially with a method on individual numbers, even with flat betting. Basic knowledge! And you need tons of time and patience.

At that point I decided to expand the number of sessions per Permanenz: From one session to four. So I went back to the first day of yeasteryear and included three more sessions from that day. Etc.
After just 73 days the total number of chips in my continued test series = 459.
X0X0X
Dane

Dane · October 23, 2012, 12:53:28 PM

-

News:

A MUCH better (and easier) method on individual numbers