2 nºs Safety System 62 spins

[webconst]

The progression is for split or for 2 separated nºs ,made to win average 16â,¬ till the spin 15.
From 16 to 50 spins is set to finish on almost the same bankroll ( on "0" profit and lose) -bets till now 153â,¬
Comparing with aggressive progression till spin 50 should be spend already about 400â,¬ till spin 50!From 50 to 62 spins the system finish with fixed bet which is set to cover all spends divided to 2 and the player can lose average 74â,¬. On spin 62 we lost 233â,¬ which is not bad taking in consideration the small probabilities to lose in this stage and the opportunity to use the same but double system if we lose all.If we do it we need to win only 7 times to recover the loses
Summary in european roulette we have: chance to win 2x15/37 (81%) ,depending of the test results in the future the initial part could be fixed more aggressive if we have more favourable results,if we have more loses than we expect, we should redesign the bet amounts and to make larger and less profitable the part of the system when we win.
I have tested (playing) similar aggressive progression and till now i win till 15-28 spin but for sure was very risky

[Nathan Detroit]

progression ? A better word  for  martingale ? Chasing losses.

[webconst]

Please read carefully before post,thank you

[Nathan Detroit]

Chasing losses  does not make any one a winner.

[mogul397]

Chasing losses  does not make any one a winner.

Ultimately bets made at the correct (or incorrect) time makes you a winner or loser.

My latest thinking makes me wonder if the idea of recouping losses directly from
and after a  loss or losses, may in fact be part of the problem. The hard alternative to
it is to play up as you win.

In other words the TIMING of the bets and progressions is the problem. The killer
series is just that. A series. If you knew that in your crystal ball, that it was that, then
you wouldn't automatically jump on the death wagon.

So what I'm saying is that the root of the problem is that a loss becomes the trigger
to get it back.

[Nathan Detroit]

Mogul,

I never  make any attempt to win back a loss. My MM MO is geared to the Up and pull system and an  exit strategy.


The  winning formula:


Proper bankroll- Bet Selection -Money management- Discipline   - never replay any net winnings  during a session.( win goal , loss limits are only geared to the bankroll  one has brought  to the table and ey should never include winnings.  Those winnings go home with you even if you did lose part of the original bankroll.

[webconst]

About the published strategy the weak place is that we have many spins where the money are spend "for nothing" or even "-" but this is just variation of hundred drafts for bet which I made with Excel to calculate the bets

Every time after lose we play to win or to recuperate (is the same) and doesn't matter if we think is for win back or not.For experienced player is the same result if we do it with new game after 5 min. or tomorrow. Will be not the same if we like to change the tactic and we don't need the same nºs.

To win in determined moment ( for somebody can be year,for another 1 hour or 1 day) we should choose - any type of progression with prepared defense after lose or flat bets in D'Alembert style in f() of the time or f()of the money target. If we bet only on luck-this game will be for pleasure.

The problem is not when lose,the problem is to win more than to lose.

[webconst]

-