New Year Gift to ALL

[ghost888]

Now, your method modified so that it will work much better.

So same: play progressive bets on 31 spins by betting on the 5 neighboors.

Every 6 or 7 losses in a row, switch table and casino. So, if you fall in the neighboors mood, you can win a lot of times (maybe 5, 6 times in 10 spins) and when the neighboors are cold on your actual table, you should just leave the table and pick another one to pursue your progressive bets.

By selecting your other table in another casino, you are sure that the casino cannot cheat on you and you will take advantage of the lucky spins after a new deposit 

[ghost888]

Missing upto 25,30,35 times is pretty common

Sorry, one last thing. If you follow the probability, you ahould get one of the 5 neighboors every 7 spins.
So, when you are saying it is pretty common to miss the neighboors 25,30,35 times, you are in fact saying it is pretty common that the neighboors come much less often than any other numbers   
So, why again do you want to choose the 5 neighboors and not just pick any 5 numbers different at each spins (different at each spins is just to make sure you are not picking sleeping numbers) ?

[TopPlayer1975]

Ghost

You have not understood the fundamental point that betting is on the Neighbour of the last number hit by waiting for last number and its 4 neighbouring numbers missing to hit AGAIN in 18 spins.

I find pretty easy with the progression playing neighbours, you may chose your way.

I only play in Real life or Live casinos of repute where there are 100 of players on the table.  Your cold neighbour theory is invalid and i disagree that All Live Casinos cheat.

Finally my system is a free Gift. Unless you test and get a Single loss of bankroll, then only cooment and share the Spins.

Ihave already won over half a million pounds GBP using this without a single loss so far.

Cheers and enjoy winnings.
TopPlayer

[ghost888]

I am trying to save your money here.

You don't see your whole method is falling apart. You are going to lose everything if you lose 31 times in a row and you are saying it is pretty common to see no neighboors for 35 times in a row!!!! Think please before to talk.

You believe you are safer because you waited for 18 misses in a row. So, yes, based  on your experience, you have about 100 times less chance to lose. But your winning are going 100 times slower also, so at the end, the balance between your win and your lose will be exactly the same. So, if you believe you are going to lose everything by playing at every spins, I can guarantee you 100% you will lose also everything by waiting  for 18 misses in a row.

Easy example, I saw once no black during 53 spins on live roulette. So, if I take your theory, I just need to wait for let say 45 black misses in a row and be able to play progressive bet for 8 times in a row and be sure to win as we never seen more than 53 misses in a row with millions of spin. 0% chance to lose, correct? True, I can watch millions of spin without losing.... but big problem, unfortunately, no win neither. The truth, I saw only once 45 times without black in a row (the same time I saw 53 times without black of course) so if I waited for 45 losses in a row, I would have lost my 8 next bet. So, based on my experience, in one time out of one, we would have lost everything  even if the chances to get 53 losses in a row were really close to 0.

Now, luckily for me, I was betting on the hot colour as always and I won almost 50  times in a row (if we remove the two times the 0 came out).

I want to hear the truth from you. Your target is to win only 20% of your bankroll which is really not a proof at all of a winning method. To call your method a winning method, you need as a minimum to be able to multiply your bankroll by 5 before losing and being able to repeat a lot of times. So, were you able to win 25 times 20% of your bankroll to make it once 5 times??? To be honest with you, even if you said yes, I don't believe you.

[TopPlayer1975]

I have been able to multiply my bankroll 858 times so far without a single loss.

believe it or not but I dont care, maybe I am lucky

[ghost888]

Anyway, you don't understand anything to the stats.
I was the only one believing in your method before you started to argue with me that if your method is really working, it has to work even if you play at every single spin. Statistically, it can't be different and based on my experience, waiting time will even make the things worst and worst (possibly because of the reasons I gave earlier).

But now, I am 100% sure nobody will believe that you won 858*600$ with a starting bet of 0.5$ and by playing only once every 100 spins (or 20 - 25 as you are tracking 4, 5 tables at a time).

Again, if I get your numbers wrong, it is by laziness. I don't want to read again your posts to verify your numbers but contrary to what you keep saying, I totally understood perfectly your method since your post number 1.

[ghost888]

And if you limit each of your session to 20% of your bankroll, so you already did almost 3,500 winning sessions but few days ago, you were still giving other methods and looking for winning methods. So, when did you start your method and when did you have time to do your 3,500 winning sessions?? Please try to be realistic in your lies LOL

[ghost888]

So, as foreseen, some corrections in my numbers: your starting bet is 0.1$ and not 0.5$ so it is even worst than what I said.

And your winning sessions required to win what you said you won is 4,300 winning sessions and not 3,500. So, again even worst that what I said.

With big lies like that, I am sure you lost all credibility forever in this forum LOL

[Franky]

I am surprised that he does not use any elements of VB or bias in this method he posted as a gift, but he said not long ago that only ways to beat a roulette needs to be based on them.

[Nathan Detroit]

+If someone can p;lay with a minimum of 50 cents  then what is the table MAX ? What kind of a casino are  we dealing  with?

Our most reasonable B& M casinos require a minimum  of at least $ 5 but  that is  usually during off hours with  hardly any traffic.


I don`t think those 50 joints are threat to MONTE CARLO   or the  RITZ in London. LoL.

[ghost888]

I saw some rng roulette which could go from 10 cents to illimited.... but of course they were rigged. And once I complained to a casino their Rng roulette was rigged, they completely changed it and they installed restrictions lol.

Usually, the restrictions on live roulettes are also less important than on real roulettes... but more restreint than on rng roulettes...

[Nathan Detroit]

Thanks for the explanation. 

ND

[JLP]

I saw some rng roulette which could go from 10 cents to illimited.... but of course they were rigged. And once I complained to a casino their Rng roulette was rigged, they completely changed it and they installed restrictions lol.

Usually, the restrictions on live roulettes are also less important than on real roulettes... but more restreint than on rng roulettes...

ghost888,

Do you have some info about this online casinos. Bitstarz and Playamo??
They both use the same type of wheel.
I see the table limits range from 1(min) to 1000 (max).
_www.bitstarz.com
_www.playamo.com
But Playamo only accepts Bitcoin as form of payment.

 

[ghost888]

I don't have anything against Bitstarz and I didn't know Playamo.

The rigged rng roulette was an instant games with the sports games. Those are really the worst. Obviously, nobody verifies if they are honest or not. After I complained to the casino, it had been replaced by a Playtech rng.

Usually, you should doubt against the casinos if you win too easily at the beginning... because before you know it, you will lose everything you won.

[Bebediktus]

Here is what you do:
Google in : Christian Kaisan Wiesbaden you tube.He is that well known German   roulette  pro .
 You will notice that he  is doing quite a bit of recording something into his note book. Could be numbers I  presume. What else.

Could be numbers , but they if are, not so essential,  are more important data in his notebook.