Has this method worked for anyone?

[Danger Man]

What is there to misunderstand? The quote is clear as day and demonstrates that you are probably a very new player with limited experience. When I have time I will look into coding your systems and they will all be found to lose at at rate of approx. 2.7p for ever £1 wagered. Failing that I will explain to the forum in layman's terms why you actually haven't been winning for the last 10 years and why members should start to address parts of the game which are seldom discussed. You'll have to forgive my bluntness, you don't strike me as a professional player and I simply suspect that you aren't.

[Noble Savage]

If your system is playable by anyone who learns it, then it is mechanical.
If it is mechanical, it can be coded (win targets and stop loss rules included).

Posting the results of a couple hundred spins or watching you play for a week is of no relevance. It doesn't show the system's long-term performance especially when a staking plan/progression is involved. (people would be interested in a system that would work for a lifetime, not for a week)

A verifiable tests of hundreds of thousands of spins however does.

I (too) can write a simulation to test any of your systems, just post the rules. I'll post the results along with the simulation (so people can test it on their own actuals if they want).

I will bet you as much as you want that it will fail.

[Noble Savage]

Let me rephrase:

The way you operate the strategy is based on rules, correct?

These rules would include things like when to bet, how much to bet, when not to bet, when to take profit and stop the session, when to cut losses, etc. etc. etc.

The system along with the way you operate it can be coded. Understand?

Just post every single rule and I'll let the simulation play exactly as YOU would play.

(Unless of course you don't use any such rules and act on gut feeling, in which case I'd ask you how exactly do you plan to teach THAT to people.)

[cheese]

Your observation of the 28,29,30 street is erroneous>>>

Dangerman, if you look closely, on all tables the frets surrounding those 3 numbers are slightly higher than all the other frets. The pockets are also a little deeper. These 3 numbers are golden and I'm really pissed at Fender for giving it away. The casinos will now change the wheels and we're screwed. Thanks a lot, Dangerman. 

[cheese]

-