A Sleeper of an idea

[Mr Chips]

Hi TKS,
 
You will either need to list the numbers from the wheel clockwise 0 to 26 or have a copy of the wheel handy.
 
Here are the numbers:
 
31
36
7
15
36
24
7
23
24
6
4
 
[disc]31,36,7,15,36,24,6,4[/disc]
 
Numbers 4 and 15 have created the first single gap which is 19. The three numbers will be noted in the chart as follows :
 
[table=,]
A,B,C
4,19,15
[/table]
 
The 4 created the gap so it goes in column A, 19 is the gap number, which goes in B and 15 is the adjacent number and goes
in C.

32
3
22 creates gap number 9
16
13 creates gap number 27
36
16
7
16
14
19 the first repeat and will be the first bet
 
[table=,]
A,B,C
4,19,15
22,9,31
13,27,6
[/table]
 
[table=,]
A,B,C
,19,
[/table]
 
If say 22 came in next, a check from the above shows 22 in the A column and this will be noted in the betting column A.
The next bet will still be 19 as A would have to be in the lead to change the bets from column B to A.
 
As I previously mentioned this is still at the idea stage and if it holds up after having done 30 sessions I will get a better
idea how it handles and whether any further improvements can be made and perhaps will be the seeds of a system.
 
Hope this explanation helps. I welcome of course any ideas you have on it.
 
Regards
 
Mr Chips
 

 

 

[The Spiders Kiss]

thank you Mr Chips
I get it now
Will test shortly and post results
your friend
The Spiders Kiss

[Mr Chips]

Hi TSK,
 
I have been looking at a further improvement and applied it to the loss shown above and at 15 spins it showed +83, so will
apply it to the next five sessions and see how it turns out. By the time I've finished I will have turned a simple idea into a
complex system, but that happens to all my systems lol.
 
The improvement centres round the gap chart. As soon as a single gap appears we note it as usual, but we also now place a
1 at the side, when any of the three numbers hit and if it's in the lead, the three numbers are included in the bets. They will
remain single unit bets and not increase when there is a hit.
 
This appears to have the advantage, when bets are placed on the leader of the betting column say A, there is a chance to
pick up on an active number in another column.
 
As this is still at the experimental stage I will try it for a few sessions. You have to be careful to note 1,2,3 etc by the side
of the gap chart and include a number, which can appear in two different columns.
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

With the additional improvements.
 
[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
12.12.08,37,+104
13.12,22,+113
14.12,52,+52
[/table]

[The Spiders Kiss]

Hi Mr Chips
certainly made for nice results.
Im away for a couple days and though ill have access to pc not sure about roulette         
but will take alook as soon as I can
TSK

[Mr Chips]

[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
15.12.08,62,-86
[/table]

This is gradually turning into a constructive system. There was sufficient info in this session to come to a decision as
to when to exit. There were several occasions when the loss hovered between -50 and -100. The gap chart bets were
insignificant and became even less so as the unit bets got higher. The bets went up to 22 units and there were too
many numbers with 1 unit and not 3, in order get into profit. Column C was seven in front of the second column B and
so the session was locked into column C numbers.

Therefore weighing all this info up an exit in the -50 to -100 range was appropriate.
 
This will be a guide line for future sessions. Ideally an exit in the -50 range where possible or in the event of the above
situation, an exit in the -50 to -100 range.
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
16.12.08,39,+137
17.12,89,-45
18.12,41,+205
19.12,43,+263
20.12,51,+74
21.12,30,+306
22.12,35,+86
23.12,62,+160
[/table]
 
24.12 [smiley=Santa001.gif]
25.12[smiley=Santa001.gif]

[Mr Chips]

[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
26.12.08,46,+92
27.12,63,-1
[/table]

[VLSroulette]

Richard, this sure is coming to looking great! Winning in the averages is the way to go, as I doubt there is a true "holy grail" which never loses a session, yet there are viable propositions which can help the player put himself into a fair chance to be ahead of the game, given he isn't faced with the odd extreme conditions everytime.

Of course nobody beats prolonged dispersion of hits (no hits, no wins, nothing to do) but the usual flow of the game isn't like that, players do have some hit rate expected. Of course, you need the "tested events" for wrapping your system around, and to know when things are "regular" or "deviated from the norm" to make your decisions, I'm 100% here with you. From this (organization/tracking) point of view it is way better to bet systematically than just random bet without any bet selection to wrap anything around..

Looking forward to seeing the final version to go to "Full Systems" section mate

Kudos to you and keep up the good work. Totally "delicious" to see "Mr. Chips" is back!

[Mr Chips]

Hi Victor
 
Thanks.
 
I was pleasantly surprised how well it has developed. It is not the usual sort of system I would usually create,
but the results have been good and I have managed to incorporate many of the exit strategies I would normally
want in a constructive system.
 
With this type of system there is always the chance of a larger loss beyond the controlled losses, which I would
use with 'sections', so I would advise the use of building up bank rolls, which I will mention later on.
 
I have almost finished with the idea stage and then yes, it can go over to "Full Systems" for further testing.
 
It will be called the 'Isolani system' after a certain chess position.
 
Regards

Richard

[Mr Chips]

[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
28.12.08,68,+208
[/table]

[VLSroulette]

It will be called the 'Isolani system' after a certain chess position.

For those interested on the Isolated pawn move:
Wikipedia - "An isolated queen's pawn is often called an isolani."

Good name for the system Richard 

Victor

[Mr Chips]

[table=,]
Date,spins,+/-
29.12.08,94,-327
30.12,71,+26
31.12,89,-88
[/table]
 
The first big loss. Hopefully exceptional wins will cancel out the big losses. The previous win of +306 was close to the loss,
so further tests will see if this works out. I will examine the loss in some detail to see if any improvements can be made.
 
The Totals for the December test as follows :
 
[table=,]
Totals,spins
+2654,
-587,
-----,
+2067,1664
[/table]
 
The idea tests have now finished and will do some further tests in the "Full Systems" and will explain the system in more
detail.
 
Mr Chips

[pghilip]

Mr. Chips,

Thanks for posting your ideas.  I am looking foward to any further changes/improvements to this idea.  I am having difficulty understanding the second chart in reply #9.  Hopefully this will be cleared up in your future posts.

Thanks again,
Phil

[Mr Chips]

Phil,
 
I will eventually explain the system in detail in the Full Systems section together with any improvements.
 
Thanks for your interest.
 
Regards
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

-