Finding a CONSISTENT Losing Roulette Bet

[lucky_strike]

How about divide something and when one thing is left and all the others has hit with in expectation and one left that has not hit with in expectation then you play this one.
This way you can win 20 to 50 bets in a row flat betting if it goes for sleep a very long time or if they close come back the next day and continue.

You can name it the very next thing is for this one to hit but does it?

LS

Well i will also post some results soon

LS

[lucky_strike]

OMG that was a good idea

Made a short test:

Well its groups of 3 LL LW W and this below is just how the groups win or lose.

W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L


Cheers LS

[Lohnro]

I have a flat bet that I tested over 26 sessions, it won only 2!
And the 2 that won were not really good winners. The 24 that lost were pretty bad losers, way above the house 2.7%.
I've attached results if anyone is interested, up to now it seems no-one really is.
Any comments please?
Cheers, Phil

Wow Phil, that is REALLY bad!  What were you doing?

[ozshabs]

Posted on: Yesterday at 10:39:28 PMPosted by: Philc 
Insert Quote
Hi Lohnro,
The bet is described here:
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/bet-selection/finding-a-consistent-winning-roulette-bet/msg44924/#msg44924

Tested with an excel spreadsheet provided by Ozshabs, only thing is the results are so bad that I'm beginning to wonder if the excel formulas are 100%, just waiting for Ozshabs to get back to me.
I'll let you know when he does, hopefully to confirm its rubbish
Cheers,
phil

Hi Philc

I have retested the excel sheet and the formulas are working as per the rules mentioned in your post. Have you been using the updated one? The first one had issues dealing with 0, however, the second one is free of that issue.

Regards

[hoper35]

The only consistently losing bets that I can think of is to bet 37 or 38 different numbers on the same spin.  I guess betting all 3 dozens, R/B, O/E, L/H, etc, might also qualify (over a longer period of spins).

[Moccoman]

Originally, I thought to capture the "runs and changes (but not all), the bet might be -

Last spin is 22, so bet Black, Even and High (for the run to continue) with (for the change) Column 3, with 8 Reds/4 Blacks and Dozen 1, being the change from High (well 12/18). If any 3 won then I was in profit, but it failed miserably!

Mocco

[Lohnro]

The only consistently losing bets that I can think of is to bet 37 or 38 different numbers on the same spin.  I guess betting all 3 dozens, R/B, O/E, L/H, etc, might also qualify (over a longer period of spins).

Hi hopper35,

For sure they are all losing bets, but how do they lose less than expected?

[bombus]

Here's one I sometimes walk around the casino and play for fun...not.
I've never given it a proper test, but I swear I have been able to lose for hours on end doing this.

Watch the dozens 1-2-3 & the columns A-B-C.
You are waiting to see any dozen hit once, followed by either of the two remaining dozens to hit twice in a row. You then focus on the remaining dozen.
You do this with the columns at the same time.
You only bet when an overlap occurs with the remaining dozen/column, so that there will be 4 numbers to bet on.
Ignore the zero when tracking.
Example:
Spin results> 1,17,20
1 is dozen 1 column A.
17 is dozen 2 column B.
20 is dozen 2 column B.
Now dozen 3 column C becomes the intersected target zone, numbers 27,30,33,36.
Bet only once, splits or straight up or eventually both.
Track as above continuously for betting opportunities betting only once on each occasion, and play a suitably daft progression for 4 numbers.
I call it, "The Old 123".
It really sucks...good luck. 

[bombus]

-