Super Roulette Software

[Kingpin]

Ok,
Thanks for the replies.
Guess we'll find out one way or the other.

I hope people will be posting about their experiences regarding this matter.

Best Regards
Kingpin

[VLSroulette]

Since this is a quite active thread and I didn't want to start a new one to say this, I'll say it here:

Victor,

Love that "go up" "go down" feature!!  Geez, the colors are in color!! 

Sam

Sam, I'm very glad you liked it.

We have PREV and NEXT links to enjoy an easier topic reading (Enabled for section index also)

You gotta love those too

Regards,
Victor

[Kingpin]

We have PREV and NEXT links to enjoy an easier topic reading  (Enabled for section index also)

You gotta love those too

I love them, have been wondering why we didn't have them before.
It's nice to see that improvements are made all the time. Good work Victor 

Best Regards
Kingpin

[thomasgrant]

Umm, not sure about the last two posts in this topic.
Makes no sense to me what so ever.

I will be posting an update as soon as I reach the target that I am going for.

[VLSroulette]

Some replies splitted to the pit: HERE.

[roules]

Hi Kingpin,

Thanks for your comments regarding the use of the BOT and issues that may arise concerning the casino catching on.

This can be counteracted in a few ways:
- only release a certain number of units.This is being strongly considered and will help prevent detection as well as protect current users.
- adding a random delay pause to the bot to further simulate human behaviour. This will make it appear more human driven rather than software driven
- supporting more casinos (live dealer most likely). This will give user's more options and 'spread the load' so to speak.

Thousands of people play online everyday and at the moment the number of users playing with this BOT would not be a drop in the ocean, so I would think right now detection is not an issue.

Cheers
Matt

Hey Matt,
Thanks for the info etc you've posted so far, this thread (the on-topics posts anyway) have made for some interesting reading.
With the random delay, would you consider adding longer delays to emulate a few breaks of say 5-10 mins?
Also have you/anyone tried to withdraw money from BV yet to check if this is a problem? This wouldn't be worthwhile obviously if the bot made a heap of money you couldn't touch.
Cheers,

Roules

[super-roulette]

Hey Matt,
Thanks for the info etc you've posted so far, this thread (the on-topics posts anyway) have made for some interesting reading.
With the random delay, would you consider adding longer delays to emulate a few breaks of say 5-10 mins?
Also have you/anyone tried to withdraw money from BV yet to check if this is a problem? This wouldn't be worthwhile obviously if the bot made a heap of money you couldn't touch.
Cheers,

Roules

Hi Roules, thanks for your interest in Super Roulette.

We released an updated version on Sunday just gone. With this version (amongst other added features) you can specify how long you want the BOT to wait for minimum and maximum counts (measured in 1000s of a second).The BOT will randomly wait between these values before spinning the wheel and placing a bet. It is simplistic at the moment but it does add random pauses at random times and makes the whole process seem less mechanical.

I have been playing at Bet Voyager for close to 6 months and had no problems depositing or withdrawing money - I use Money Bookers so cannot comment on other methods.

Kind Regards
Matt

[super-roulette]

-