You have to see this!

[Boo_Ray]

If you take a look at this chevals I place on the red carpet then you can see the point why some selections has an relation on the wheel layout and the carpets layout.

It is a cross-over and we all know what the classical probability has to say about that and it covers 12 numbers with 6 placed bets

LS

Hey LS
I used that bet selection a while ago... It is good for positive progression
somethimes you get over 10hits in a row but it is the same for misses...
when raising value of chips I usualy covered 26 and 30..

But again.. Like every other things we tested... Exit point is very important... Actualy it is all about exit point

[lucky_strike]

Thanks.
I find it usefull that there exist an relation betwen the wheels layout whit the carpets layout.

Cheers LS

[roules]

Cheers for posting this stuff LS et al 

[Homeito]

Hello,

Has any one tried to use a combination of those sets with some kind of selection?
Like: "In this case you use this set but in an other case you use that other set."

There are "half-moons" and "opposites" showed here and several of each.
I think that maybe they can be used together and not only one like that system that TwoCatSam posted (Thank you!)


Best regards
Homeito Bemek

[lucky_strike]

Hello,

Has any one tried to use a combination of those sets with some kind of selection?
Like: "In this case you use this set but in an other case you use that other set."

There are "half-moons" and "opposites" showed here and several of each.
I think that maybe they can be used together and not only one like that system that TwoCatSam posted (Thank you!)


Best regards
Homeito Bemek

Hi Homeito and all.
Well i think this is a good post with nice replays and i am sure some one will come up with an brilliant idea how to use this.

Cheers LS

[TwoCatSam]

Guys

If you wanted to just bet straight-up numbers, KFS wrote a beautiful tracker program to do that.  You can set any amount of numbers from 2 on up and call it a sector.  You can have it hit a number of times and then alert you or you can have it sleep a number of times and then alert you.  It is called Alert-er or some such.

It works perfectly with the Gamlet "Fire and Ice" as it can track both.

Sam

[winkel]

There are a lot of systems to be played on these Chances:

1 ......

2.
Combination of Voisons and Tieres (my developement)
0 3 15 26 32 35
5 8 10 23 24 30

if one of these numbers appear rebet this 12 numbers
same procedure as first system

a) you can play them en Plein or
b) partly Plein partly split
0-3
5-8
23-24
32-35
10
15
26
30

br
winkel

see here nolinks://vlsroulette.com/gambling-and-roulette-related/tiers-orphelins-or-voisins/

[Homeito]

Hello,


Lucky Strike...

Maybe some one has just thought of it in theory but even that will be good.
I can see that learning all those sets of splits can not be easy.
And maybe it is also hard place chips all over a crowded table...

But just for a start.


Sam...

Thank you for that information!


I will search for it.
I think I read something like that but thought that it was about VB play. And that is way above me...


Best regards
Homeito Bemek

[Homeito]

Hello again,

Winkel...

Thank you for that.
I had a look but that was not quite what I mean...

I mean like that you have a selection that sometimes tells you to bet "my" set A and sometimes for example the "half-moon" that Sam posted.
And in a third situation a third set.

Something like that.

Also only for theory. I do not mind


Best regards
Homeito Bemek

[lucky_strike]

Qoute:
There are a lot of systems to be played on these Chances:

1 ......

2.
Combination of Voisons and Tieres (my developement)
0 3 15 26 32 35
5 8 10 23 24 30

if one of these numbers appear rebet this 12 numbers
same procedure as first system

a) you can play them en Plein or
b) partly Plein partly split
0-3
5-8
23-24
32-35
10
15
26
30

br
winkel

Combination of Voisons and Tieres is a littel fuzzy even for me and I know the wheel I have memorize it but I can't say I know Voisons / Tieres.
Thats why I post the combinations here.



Winkels combinations:

[disc]0,3,15,26,32,35,5,8,10,23,24,30,[/disc]

Quote:
a) you can play them en Plein or
b) partly Plein partly split
0-3
5-8
23-24
32-35
10
15
26
30




LS

[lucky_strike]

Well I can't see so much differens betwen this two except my cut it whit chevals only and more easy to memorize.



[disc]12,35,3,0,32,15,24,5,10,23,8,11,[/disc]


LS

[lucky_strike]

I wondering how you play one section only with one crossover, can it be done, like playing one dozen.

LS

[Homeito]

Hello,

Lucky Strike...

"One section only with one crossover" ... can you give example?



All...

I have investigated a bit about the split-sets in previous posts.

I noticed that the split-sets
#1: 0-3, 4-7, 9-12, 15-18, 19-22, 26-29, 28-31, 32-35 (8 splist)
#2: 1-2, 6-9, 14-17, 20-21, 22-25, 31-34 (6 splits)
#3: 5-8, 10-11, 13-16, 23-24, 27-30, 33-36 (6 splist)

(I make the disc-tag at the bottom of the post)

...cover the whole wheel and are over-lapping only three numbers: 9, 22 and 31 between groups 1 and 2.


(This was 15395 dealers from Wiesbaden with at least 15 spins. I have not so many in my own records.)


First I looked at when a dealer had a majority (4-10) of one group in his ten first spins: What will the next five spins show?

I found nothing of real interest...


Then I looked at it this way: Regardless how many times a group wins in the first tens spins: Bet the split-set until a win or maximum five times.

There was some interesting things here (well... maybe not because they all lost):

For group #3 the losses were just around 2.7%
For group #1 the losses were 3% or above(!)

For group #2 the losses were 1.7% or below(!) when there was a maximum of four wins in the first ten spins.
If there was more than four wins in the first ten spins the losses were around 3%


Then I looked on how long sequences each group had within each dealer.
This time when #9, 22 or 31 wins it goes to group #2 and NOT to group #1.
So group #1 is 13 numbers, groups #2 and 3 are 12 numbers each.

Again group #2 was a bit different: It had sequences up to 10 (24 sequences > 6) when group #1 had only up to length 9 (13 sequences > 6) and Group #3 had a maximum length of 7 (11 of them)

I can not see any reason for it to be so different.

Can you?


"Of course" all groups lost units in the end.
But maybe the 1.7% or less loss is an indication of something?

Any comments?


Best regards
Homeito Bemek


Here are the three split-sets in discs:

Split-set #1 (8 splits):
[disc]0,3,4,7,9,12,15,18,19,22,26,28,29,31,32,35[/disc]

Split-set #2 (6 splits):
[disc]1,2,6,9,14,17,20,21,22,25,31,34[/disc]

Split-set #3 (6 splits):
[disc]5,8,10,11,13,16,23,24,27,30,33,36[/disc]

[Homeito]

-