I think i have found win3million BET!

[viper5]

I have found a patern that is on the table.

i did 30 tests of 100 spins

all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips

is this meen that i have found the winning bet?

charles if u want sent me email

[Boo_Ray]

there is no win3million bet, that bet never existed

but it is good if you found someting that may bring you profit

[Marven]

Another HG viper?

I have found a patern that is on the table.

What do you mean by "pattern"?
It's very obvious there are patterns in the way the table layout is designed. The question is whether or not it can be taken advantage of.

Also, did you use flat betting?
Did you bet on every spin?
How many units per bet on average?

I did 30 tests of 100 spins

all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips

is this meen that I have found the winning bet?

Not necessarily. It only means your bet is probably worth conducting a real test on (an extensive one). I have once tested the G.U.T. mechanically over 5000 spins and came up with more profit than that. It doesn't mean the system won in the long run (at least when played mechanically).

Be scientific and don't rush to conclusions.

Your friend,
Marven

[RPro75]

I have found a patern that is on the table.

I did 30 tests of 100 spins

all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips

is this meen that I have found the winning bet?

charles if u want sent me email

Ok, I'll say to you what I say to everyone that claims this.  If you have it, post it or PM it to someone you trust and have them post a simple YES or NO.  Viper, please don't be offended, I respect you and the systems you have created and I think you are a great roulette player.  You can see why I am skeptical, though.

Best Regards,

Chris

[viper5]

it is not based on a patern on the table lay out(like reds and colums anomalies)
I bet on every spin and 0 is a loss

I did the tests from dbet and wesbian spins

Charles was right....anly with real spins u can win(rng isnt the right one)

the system is based on  nums sequence

Rpro THANK U soooo much!

[Ka2]

I'm getting tired of peopele finding stuff and telling everyone about it, but dont share....

Their answer: "Why should we?"

My answer: Then please don't tell. For what its worth, you're only upsetting other forum members, and for what cause?

[Jakkalsdraai]

hehehehe @ Ka2,

agreed! Come on Viper spit it out mate! ......or did it fail

Cheers
Jakk

[bombus]

Another HG viper?

What do you mean by "pattern"?
It's very obvious there are patterns in the way the table layout is designed. The question is whether or not it can be taken advantage of.

Also, did you use flat betting?
Did you bet on every spin?
How many units per bet on average?

Not necessarily. It only means your bet is probably worth conducting a real test on (an extensive one). I have once tested the G.U.T. mechanically over 5000 spins and came up with more profit than that. It doesn't mean the system won in the long run (at least when played mechanically).

Be scientific and don't rush to conclusions.

Your friend,
Marven

Here, here.

I vote for Marven......... what, we're not voting?......... Doesn't matter, I still vote for Marven!

[bombus]

-