Live Testing of Roulette Systems/Methods

[rjeaton1]

Oh, and Victor, I just wanted to let you know that I added a link to your Forum on my "channel".  This way if somebody (by happenstance) comes across my channel that isn't from here, they'll know where to go!

[rjeaton1]

Alright, time change for next live session (something came up).  It will now be 4:00 pm Eastern Time (sorry about that).

Scratch the above...unfortunately my schedule has changed again (I'm really sorry about this guys, It's hectic for me here)  I will be doing it at 2:30 pm eastern time.  In the future before I post a time of a live test I will make absolutely sure that it will be done at that time.

[Boo_Ray]

Again, for anybody interested, I will be doing my next "live session" promptly at 2:00 PM Eastern Time. 

Anybody have any input on this method, or more importantly, has anybody else tried it?

I'm curious as to what the results acheived were by anybody that has tried this.  Thanks guys (and gals)!

Hey I will be on again I will first try to learn how you make your decisions about pateren breaks and continuing paterns..

[rjeaton1]

@ boo-ray - A portion of how I decide whether or not to bet on continuing/breaking patterns is this.  I read a lot about random recently, and when you have two variables (H AND T for Heads and Tails or 1 and 0 for binary code) a large portion of determining whether they're random or not is the following two things (at least from what I've read).

Number of Runs & Length of Runs.  (the following is from Random.Org

The concept of runs: number and length. A run is a repeated outcome. A run is defined as a sequence of repeating heads or tails. A new run occurs when a new symbol appears. For example, if 3 flips of a coin produce "HTT," there are two runs: one of length 1--the first H, and one of length 2 --the second and third "T." Many people mistakenly think that a random coin toss would produce alternating sequences of HTHTHTHT... Although a randomly flipped coin might produce this once in a while, it is highly unlikely.  For example:

sequence:   H H T T H T T H H H H T T T T T
run symbol:   ___ ___ _ ___ _______ _________

n of runs:    1   2  3  4     5       6

run length:    2   2  1  2     4       5

Things to Remember:
Number of runs is number of occurrences, not number of repeats.
Remember to reset the length of the run to 1 everytime a new run begins.
Did you consider the number of times either a head repeated OR a tail? You've got to look at both. There were 4 heads in run #5, but run #6 was a longer run of tails.


Failures in randomness could produce too many runs (more than 60) or too few (less than 40) in a given sequence, and their length could be either too short (less than 4) or too long (more than 10)

So basically, patterns do form and then those patterns have to break.  I know this isn't exactly an "apples to apples" comparison, but to get a good idea where this new method of mine originated, I suggest you look at the following two sites:

The first is a "Virtual Coin Flipper" (imagine that heads is 1 and tails is 2)  Notice the number of runs that Random has to produce?

nolinks://nlvm.usu.edu/en/nav/frames_asid_305_g_3_t_5.html

This is a much more detailed explanation about random and it's patterns (or lack thereof)

nolinks://faculty.rhodes.edu/wetzel/random/mainbody.html#imagine

[Boo_Ray]

Interesting, will check that out

[rjeaton1]

If you go to link number two in the post above, take note of number 3 on that page.  It reads as follows (in regards to determining whether a string of coin flips, numbers, etc. is random)

3. Serial dependencies or autocorrelations: One randomness requirement is that there are few patterns and they don't repeat very often.

[rjeaton1]

Make sure you take notice to the fact that it DOES NOT read "one randomness requirement is that there are NO PATTERNS"  it says "few patterns"...meaning there are patterns (in the short run) and they are almost a requirement.

[rjeaton1]

I've got a couple of minutes free'd up, so I wanted to let you guys know I will be doing another live broadcast in 10 minutes.  It will be at 4:00 pm.

The only change you're going to see is that I am going to wait until spin 37 before I start trying to bet on patterns, I've been testing it out and it seems to be working out just a tad bit better for me.

So the first 5 minutes of broadcasting will just be me spinning to get to spin 37.

My win goal is 60 units.  If I hit that the session ends.

[rjeaton1]

For anybody that would like to watch me lose a whole bunch of money... Go ahead and watch the 7th test in the On-Demand section of my "channel"....very sad...very sad

As I said to the viewers who watched me lose, I've really got to get a hold of my emotions.  I always get this feeling that I have to beat the casino's into submission...  Bad quality...even worse quality for a gambler...lol

[Mr J]

@Rpro >>> Dont be mad with my question. lol I dont remember ALL your posts. This HG you have, can it be played on a 00 wheel at a B&M casino? Just curious. I try out many posted methods (free to you of course if it tanks) and might give yours a spin, pardon the punn.  Ken

[Homeito]

Hello,

RJ...

I watched one of your sessions. It is a great way to show your game.

And may your latest loss be your last.


I saw that you make a Black + Red bet to get free spins. And I started to wonder...

If you bet both Black and Red you will lose nothing and win nothing in 36 spins.
And when the Zero wins you will lose two chips.

If you bet only one side you will win 18 bets and lose 18 bets so you win nothing and lose nothing in 36 spins.
And when the zero wins you will only lose ONE chip.

I do not know much math and maybe I am wrong...

But my math also says that you will lose at -5.4% instead of the usual -2.7%.
A many-spins test will confirm that of course because it "always" ends at -2.7%.

BUT!
I also understand that if you do it your way you are secured against losing because of a wrong choise.
I suppose that is what you pay the extra chip for. So maybe it is a good thing after all...
As long as you are comfortable it is good for you.

Just thought I should mention it.


Best regards,
Homeito Bemek

[Boo_Ray]

For anybody that would like to watch me lose a whole bunch of money... Go ahead and watch the 7th test in the On-Demand section of my "channel"....very sad...very sad

As I said to the viewers who watched me lose, I've really got to get a hold of my emotions.  I always get this feeling that I have to beat the casino's into submission...  Bad quality...even worse quality for a gambler...lol

That can happen to everyone, well specialy the last zero was realy unlucky, you romoved it, then bam - here it is.. I think that you should change that progression, it is too agressive.. overall it was rly nice watching you, hope to see you again

[rjeaton1]

Oh, and in case you're a newcomer to this thread, you can watch the live feed here: nolinks://nolinks.livestream.com/liveroulettefeed 

[rjeaton1]

Alright guys, here I am again going to play a "system" of mine live at an RNG casino.  I've only got $131 left in there after my last withdrawal, and even if I lose it all I'll still have made a profit from this particular casino.

It's a very simple system, only involving betting on Red or Black, and it does involve a Martingale progression.

It is not however, the regular "bet on black or red until it wins" martingale system.

It is something different.  If you like to solve puzzles, I'm sure you can figure out the system while watching me play.  I will tell you guys all the details of the system after I'm finished playing.

My win goal is $50.  If I win that, I stop playing.

My stop-loss is...well...me losing all $131, haha.

If you'd like to watch, I will go live at 2:10 AM Eastern Time and you can watch it at nolinks.livestream.com/liveroulettefeed

[rjeaton1]

Just got this up and running.  It should be live now.

[rjeaton1]

-