Shortened Sure Win parlay

[admin]

Transcription:

This is it:
1,2,2,3,4,5,7,9,12,16,22,29,39,53,70,95

This gem is only costing you 1 unit and from 3th bet on, every lose still nets you wins. [smiley=4/clap.gif] [smiley=4/clapping.gif]

[admin]

Forgot to mention: this is for any even chance 1:1 proposition... But payout must be in full for proper parlay, so avoid Banker bet on baccarat, which takes 5%.

[admin]

Suggestion for bet selection for this: DBL2
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1197590520

[kenwira]

Can anyone kindly expain in detail how the sure win parlay works??

[admin]

@Patrick/Scooby

Yes, it is [highlight]up as you win[/highlight] (positive progression); and no, I'm not implementing it at the moment. I'm not playing the even chances bet for real money right now, and this parlay is for even-money propositions.

@kenwira
The main idea on the sure win is to keep on with the progression scale up to the limit, and the "sure win" name comes because after 3rd step, even if you lose, you still keep a profit.

Best regards,
Victor

[Renopolis]

I'm not saying your progresion is Bad. In fact I know by looking at it its Pretty Good because I exclusively use PARLAY PROG's and have for years as they are flat out Superior to Flat Bet Progs. However, one major flaw in your Prog is you make no Plan for when you lose 16 or more in a row. If you play for a long time YOU-WILL on occasion lose that many. REMEMBER, that is not the same as 16 losses in a row, but rather 16 unsuccesful Parlays; quite a different thing which can include many single Win's, but not a double Win. When this happens you are down a-heck-of-alot of units, I didn't take the time to add it up, but when this series goes out (and it will at times) you are down many hundreds of times your average win.   There are some extra "safety nets" which you could add to this to prevent that scenario; then it would be extremely viable.  RENOPOLIS.

[Tangram]

klJRL2  <a href="hxxp: fukpkpblaecb. com/">fukpkpblaecb</a>, buenqyxrjzhs, [link=hxxp: mppmsjswmlae. com/]mppmsjswmlae[/link], hxxp: opkxvlvdelsu. com/

[admin]

There are some extra "safety nets" which you could add to this to prevent that scenario; then it would be extremely viable.

I'm all in for knowing more about it Renopolis. And hey! Welcome to the forum family!

[TwoCatSam]

Renopolis

I agree with Victor.  I'd like to know more about it.  I have yet to see a parlay that works.  I'm not saying there isn't one; just that I haven't seen it.

Would you show it to us?

TwoCatSam

[admin]

I agree with Victor.  I'd like to know more about it.  I have yet to see a parlay that works.

Samster, I have used the parlays and they worked for me (to a certain extent, as I didn't used them for what can be considered the "long run").

I can't complain, they (parlays) treated me fair. I did hit some juicy wins at times, but also it was the most desperating thing to be down plenty of units and don't have the required back-to-back hits for many spins.

I'm eager to know Renopolis' "safety nets" too 

[Renopolis]

Hi Guy's,
  Yeah well I'd like to give you more information, but I just can't do it in a forum like this. The browsing through I've done just shows so much negativity and especially "closed-mindedness". I can just imagine if like this Rob567 guy had been around when the Wright Brothers were inovating in Aviation, he'd be ....."no guys stop, you don't understand it will never work. It will never fly and theres nothing you can do. I don't see a way and that means THERE IS NO WAY. Look, here my (fuzzy) math shows it will never fly so just stop right now or were all going to die. Don't you see I'm using MATH and that means I know everything and I couldn't possibly be wrong on anything in the universe?!?....Stop, stop now....."    Heh, heh, I mean really with that kind of thing all over this forum, this just isn't a place where I'd be interested in putting out any coherent Mathematicaly sound and powerful information.   Now I'm actually afraid that Rob567 is going to sick the "HOUSE EDGE POLICE" on me when I win. Yeah, now I imagine I'll be walking away from the Cashiers Cage a winner again for the more-times-than-I-can-count time, and these big ROBO-COP type dudes will grab me and say...."excuse me Sir, we're the HOUSE-EDGE-POLICE and we must confiscate that cash you just made at the table because the house had an edge on every spin....and progresions don't work....and blah blah blibably blah....and since we're too CLOSE-MINDED to understand what you just did that means that you can't do it....so hand over those winnings...." Hah, Hah, I mean really, Now when I'm cashing out I'm turning my head right and left looking for the H.E.P.  Anyway, I'm looking for a partner in the RENO area who is sharp, open-minded, has a burning desire to learn and earn while growing into a true pro.....but I've been looking for a long time and am pretty much convinced now that he/she doesn't exist. CHEERS anyway....RENOPOLIS.

[TwoCatSam]

What a sack of t**ds!

[Renopolis]

     Oh and by the way Tangram; not trying to be negative here, but I really have a question. How can you possibly calculate the chances of winning one Parlay in 16 when not taking into account the BET-SELECTION techniques; or lack thereof?  Not all BET-SEL's are created equal, not even close.  I have BET-SELs that will consistently outperform "Just Guessing" or "Just Betting one side or other" or other such weakling-amateur modes of play, by 15 to 20% (I'd state even better figures which are true, but may make it seem like I'm embelishing too much)
  So Math is a powerful thing (the most powerful thing in the Universe in fact) IF USED CORRECTLY and in proper context of course. The most common mistakes and falicies I see on these types of Websites though;  is anyone using MATH automatically thinks they are completely right just by virtue of the fact that they ARE USING MATH. Not at all true, as MATH can be mis-used alot easier than used correctly and accurately.
     So ANYWAY, my legitimate and non-antaginizing question is: what type of BET-SEL (or lack thereof)  is your figure of 99% based on ?

[Renopolis]

 By the way, TWOCATSAM is following me around placing little-grade-school-boy-at-recess-TURD-replys after all my POSTS. Thats FINE as the village-idiot certainly couldn't find much to do with himself aside from blindly criticizing Shakespeare in a mentally undeveloped manner.
   However, I would really like to hear from the intelligent people out there as well.  If you can further any of my POSTS with a meaningful discusion that moves toward illuminating anything of value towards these games, THEN Please do so and we may both learn something........Thats why I come to a forum, YOU?     THANKS.......RENOPOLIS. 

[Tangram]

what type of BET-SEL (or lack thereof)  is your figure of 99% based on ?

No particular bet selection, it's based on the chances of winning 2 in a row in any even game.

Bet selection makes no difference, it doesn't change the maths. That's not being negative, it's being honest. ALL bet selections will have their good and bad runs, you're entitled to believe otherwise but none will do better than any other over more than a couple of thousand spins.

[Tangram]

-