I am back stronger!!!and brought u the PERFECT BALANCE SYSTEM!!!!!

[Trung]

RPro75, did u post wrong topic? I mean u post this one in this topic - Online RNG Crack.  How To Beat RNG Roulette 100% !! - right?
btw, I'm practicing your Dio sector Mod.  Thanks again for sharing your systems.
BR,
Trung.

[simon]

This system is not an original or copyrighted system.

...actually it would be, in the United States.  As of January 1, 1978, under U.S. copyright law, a work is automatically protected by copyright when it is created. Specifically, "A work is created when it is "fixed" in a copy or phonorecord for the first time."

So technically speaking anytime anyone writes anything original and for the first time, they have copyright protection in the U.S., just so you know.

But ofcourse there is blatant disregard of copyright protection all over the Net, to the point where some people have even put their names on other people's work and sold it as their own (I saw this happen to Dr. Lim who has authored some serious works on roulette and baccarat, and someone took his entire e-book on baccarat and put their own name on it and re-sold it on the Net.)

Bottom line is right or wrong, once anyone puts anything in an email, message board or on a web page they cannot expect it to remain private. 

[The Spiders Kiss]

Has anybody tested this system with flat betting over a period of time?  I've only gotten thru 200 spins and so far am still up +52 units with largest downfall @ -33u

Hi celiza
As far as I am aware no one has tested this, flat betting long term.
Im sure we will all be interested to see your outcome for that.
regards
TSK

[ironguy]

hi skrizy

first I'd like to congratulate you for your system seems to be very good (sorry for my bad english)
Is it possible to have one precision please:
when you select numbers in 8 precedent spins, do you continue to play them until hit or only for 8 spins
my second question is: do u always play 0 ?

regards

[RPro75]

...actually it would be, in the United States.  As of January 1, 1978, under U.S. copyright law, a work is automatically protected by copyright when it is created. Specifically, "A work is created when it is "fixed" in a copy or phonorecord for the first time."

So technically speaking anytime anyone writes anything original and for the first time, they have copyright protection in the U.S., just so you know.

But ofcourse there is blatant disregard of copyright protection all over the Net, to the point where some people have even put their names on other people's work and sold it as their own (I saw this happen to Dr. Lim who has authored some serious works on roulette and baccarat, and someone took his entire e-book on baccarat and put their own name on it and re-sold it on the Net.)

Bottom line is right or wrong, once anyone puts anything in an email, message board or on a web page they cannot expect it to remain private. 

The key word there being "original".  How can it be proved that is an original system?  It is obviously not as there is nothing about it that would make it "original".  Since roulette bets have been around since the game was invented, one could argue that there is indeed nothing "original" about any roulette system because all they are is a re-hash or variation of bets that have existed since the game itself.  I suppose one could argue that the manner in which the bets are placed is what deems the work "original", but then one would have to prove that they were indeed the creator of this method and that they were the first person to think of this.  The question is, how can that be proven?  How can it be proven that they did not "borrow" the work from someone else as well and that were the first to put this in writing?  Also, anyone who takes the work of another and puts their name on it and sells it is a scumbag, plain and simple.

[Kingpin]

REMEMBER. . . . . . ROULETTE HAS BEEN AROUND A VERY LONG TIME!  the things to remember.   PLAY WITH NO EMOTION, MONEY MANAGEMENT, PLAY WITH MONEY YOU CAN AFFORD TO lose, STICK TO THE PLAN OR SYSTEM TO THE END!, AND PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE!!!!!!!!!!

This is certainly wisdom.

IMO this should be the first line of any topic on this forum.
Or maybe just a permanent qoute in the corner of this site, like the qoutes from Gandhi or something like that.

Would be nice to be constantly reminded of this, everytime we visit this site.

BR
Kingpin

[Homeito]

Hello,

Rpro75 and Simon...

There is some misunderstanding here...

You can not copyright a system, method or process. You may apply for a patent for them.
What is copyrighted is the DESCRIPTION of it.

So if Rpro75 explain the system in his OWN words the copyright of the pdf is HIS.
But if he has simply copy-and-pasted text that is not written by him without permission he is violating international copyright laws.
Because you must not publish any one elses words without permission.
That is the principle of copyright.


Best regards,
Homeito Bemek

[Number Six]

REMEMBER. . . . . . ROULETTE HAS BEEN AROUND A VERY LONG TIME!  the things to remember.   PLAY WITH NO EMOTION, MONEY MANAGEMENT, PLAY WITH MONEY YOU CAN AFFORD TO lose, STICK TO THE PLAN OR SYSTEM TO THE END!, AND PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE!!!!!!!!!!

This is certainly wisdom.
IMO this should be the first line of any topic on this forum.
Or maybe just a permanent qoute in the corner of this site, like the qoutes from Gandhi or something like that.

Would be nice to be constantly reminded of this, everytime we visit this site.

BR
Kingpin

I don't agree with red. That's why most people end up losing and write their systems off as failures. You can't just roll over and let a bad sitution overcome you - you have to adapt.

[Kingpin]

I don't agree with red. That's why most people end up losing and write their systems off as failures. You can't just roll over and let an bid sitution overcome you - you have to adapt.

Well isn't that why we have the MONEY
MANAGEMENT?

[Kingspin]

First session i won on third spin , second session i won on fourth spin. Looks a good system to me.

[Number Six]

Well isn't that why we have the MONEY
MANAGEMENT?

Well, no. MM is important, however, most people's systems don't compensate for randomness, which is why they seem to fail. People design systems that pivot on one event, and if that event doesn't happen within the limits of your BR or stop-loss then it screws up the session. Randomness is randomness, but it produces visible sequences. Look at the martingale - it will work if the random sequences are choppy, that is if the e/cs are alternating a lot. But if you are betting red and the black begins to dominate over a long cycle, then it fails and you've lost your shirt. That's why the martingale is ridiculous...it can't cope with raw randomness. A system should have multiple bets built into it, one to capitalise on each different sequence the wheel throws out. When the outcomes turn hostile to one bet, they will by default suit another. All you have to do is identify when the shifts are happening and act accordingly. Surely you have seen one man at the table cleaning up while another is on the phone remortgaging his house? I'm not telling you you're wrong or anything like that, it's just the way it is.

[RPro75]

Well, no. MM is important, however, most people's systems don't compensate for randomness, which is why they seem to fail. People design systems that pivot on one event, and if that event doesn't happen within the limits of your BR or stop-loss then it screws up the session. Randomness is randomness, but it produces visible sequences. Look at the martingale - it will work if the random sequences are choppy, that is if the e/cs are alternating a lot. But if you are betting red and the black begins to dominate over a long cycle, then it fails and you've lost your shirt. That's why the martingale is ridiculous...it can't cope with raw randomness. A system should have multiple bets built into it, one to capitalise on each different sequence the wheel throws out. When the outcomes turn hostile to one bet, they will by default suit another. All you have to do is identify when the shifts are happening and act accordingly. Surely you have seen one man at the table cleaning up while another is on the phone remortgaging his house? I'm not telling you you're wrong or anything like that, it's just the way it is.

A mix, or "arsenal" of different systems is an excellent way to attack the table.  Many times, I have run two systems simultaneously and where one misses, the other will hit.

[ced82]

Is there another people who tested this system? I'm interested by the results

[ZigZag]

I have tested 15 sessions for no loss on DB.  I like to wait until about the 15th spin.  On a win i re-track from the last 10 numbers and start again. 

[ckb18]

THATS WHY I SAID PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE.  YOU DONT GO TO THE CASINO NOT BEING PREPAIRED!! STICK TO THE SYSTEM TO THE END DONT CHANGE THE PLAN THAT YOU PRACTICED! GET IT.

[ckb18]

-