Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

It is just a matter of knowing what the wheel is throwing at the time.

Started by zippyplayer, March 21, 2011, 08:55:55 AM

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rocky


Hi TwoCatSam

As I explained these are examples of the alternating pattern: it could be 2, 20, 2 in that order for example, it could be something like 26, 8, 25, 26, I'm showing the type of alternating pattern.
Its the same number alternating either 1st and 3rd spin (i.e. 2, 20, 2) or the same number coming out 1st and 4th spin, (26,8,25,26) hope this clarifies the two e.g.'s above).

Its not guaranteed, as I explained, though it does seem to have a high strike rate from my observance over the years. You're right, this pattern doesn't happen all the time, that's why you would be constantly moving around the casino watching the display boards. I'm showing at the basic level a corelation between prior numbers and how I have seen them in a percentage of cases follow these patterns.
That's all my point was, as I don't believe in randomness, I believe roulette to be a highly ordered and also at the same time incredibly complex in its inter-relationships between numbers and complex patterns. That's why it looks totally unpredictable. Within it lies, I believe pattern upon pattern upon pattern infinitum, all waiting to be discovered. What I shared was a very tiny example of that.
 
My purpose was not to give a "system", but my observation. It may turn out that 8 to 9 successes out of 10 similiar examples over a huge sample study of "like results" will prove, not as high. So don't go out and wager on it, as I said look at your history of past spin results (do your own due diligence on the matter) and see if it rings true from your own observance. We all need to take responsibility for our own decisions and actions and question everything!

I hope I have answered your concerns TwoCatSam.

Rocky
 


crackers

Magical beliefs are the direct result of confirmation bias. It's  a prerequisite stage
that must be traversed. Randomness is usually not considered until after reaching
the conclusion that mechanical systems won't work in the long term. The first stage
of considering trend opportunities is in attributing meaning from circumstances. The
final stage is admitting that it's all coincidence. There is no meaningful cause. There
is no force that leads to a conclusion of expectation. Confirmation bias is a stage of
being stuck.

crackers

"It's just a coincidence. In trend play I make up a characteristic that best describes what I see in the randomness. In this case I see several "hot numbers." That doesn't mean that some unseen force has caused these numbers to get more active. It's just a coincidence of randomness. So targeting this syntactic coincidence with tag sets like "hot number" is only about executing a skill set. In no way is it ever a process of predicting. But talking about it drives math oriented readers nuts. It's just circumstance based on coincidence. There was never a reason to have a hissy fit."

TwoCatSam

Rocky

You've done a superb job of answering.  I would have wrote it "2, any number, 2".

Don't think I'll rush out and bet money today on it, but I'll be watching for it.

I waver on my beliefs, but I do think there are numerical patterns on the wheel--even an RNG--that can be exploited.

Thanks for your great post!

TwoCat

Rocky


Thanks TwoCat

Because of your kindness and respect, here's another stronger corelation of certain numbers in "Tracking Zero".

Once again from what I've observed; (again question and test everything I say, everyone has to make their own mind up about anything).

The numbers 7, 2, 20, 22, 34, 36, these six numbers in certain combinations, (of two and three mainly, not always), make their path back to zero. e.g. A combo of 7 and 2 is strong, also 20 and 2, even stronger is 7,2,20. Not so strong is 34 and 36 together. 7 and 22 and 2 together is strong, also 7,7,2 and start looking for zero big time. There are many combo's, look for yourself, I played for 5 hours once on the same wheel and in the last 15 minutes a combo of 5 of these numbers, it was something like 7,2,2,20,7 it was so strong IT WAS OBVIOUS, IT WASN'T LONG BEFORE ZERO CAME and I finished at that table.

Note: for some reason, when there are 4 numbers it seems to cancel this affect and zero doesn't come from what I've seen.

Check what I'm saying and see if there is not more than a thread of truth to what I've just revealed, this will help make you a winner more, with this knowledge!

My gift to all of you Roulette enthusiasts

From Rocky

Blessings and Shalom


TwoCatSam

Dublin, just now.........

27, 9, 7, 33, 27, 31,14,0

22,23,22,2,19,29,0

Hmmmmmmmmmm

Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry interesting!!

Sam


Rocky

I posted the above on the wrong thread earlier. 

Could I ask more questions on the forum, or should I PM you?  Or contact me @ TwoCatSam@cox.net.

Thanks

Sam

Rocky


Yes you can PM me Sam, most happy to hear from you.

Yes what you're showing there with 22, 23, 22, 2 (that's a Classic getting back to ZERO pattern) that's very Strong.
And it is in character to hit 1st or 3rd spin after a pattern like the one above, 22 and 2 together, I always get excited when I see them together, (as well as 7 and 2 together).

Cheers Rocky

P.S. If you're wondering from what I said last post, even though there is 4 numbers in the pattern, they are NOT all from the 6 numbers I listed earlier, i.e. (23 is between the repeat which is not one of the six) also you have a wonderful combo of 22   22  and 2, of the six listed numbers, that's a beauty! If you read this carefully and my previous Post it makes sense.

wardy03

Rocky, ''I always get excited when I see them together''

Rocky, What excites me, is your posts. The numbers you use in your examples are most important to me. 2  20  22? YES PLEASE !! And there's more. I see those numbers and they have a totally different meaning to me than they do to you. I will not reveal how or why they are important to me on this or any other forum, but would receive a PM from you with great excitement. Or perhaps I could PM you?

wardy03     

TwoCatSam

Rocky

When you use the word "together", what are you meaning?  Is there a distance, like within the last five or six spins or the last ten spins. 

Must your directing numbers--2 23 22--be a certain distance from each other?  Example

2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
22

Is that a pattern?  Or do you need

2
x
x
22

I personally use the last ten numbers that came as my guide.  If I see so many within 10, I'm good to go.

Sam

mcmonaco

What a lot of black magic,when all know here it is all evenly balanced at the end.
You should look elsewhere to find a winner.

TwoCatSam

mcmonoco

For years I have theorized that certain numbers cause other numbers to hit.  I called it "voodoo" roulette.

Now comes Ulysses and Rocky with the same theory.

Just because you have not seen a UFO is not conclusive proof there is no such thing.

Take two north pole magnets and push them together.  Now, tell me exactly and with specificity why they repel  Science cannot answer this simple question.

Let's not burn witches at the stake anymore, please!

Sam

VLS

Quote from: TwoCatSam on April 27, 2012, 05:33:39 PM
Take two north pole magnets and push them together.  Now, tell me exactly and with specificity why they repel  Science cannot answer this simple question.

Quite a curious thing our understanding of magnets, eh:

nolinks://nolinks.lifeslittlemysteries.com/588-how-do-magnets-work.html

TwoCatSam

Victor

When you push the two north poles together, there is an invisible spring you are compressing.  The closer they get, the harder they are to make touch.  To my knowledge, there is not one human on the planet who can tell you why this phenomenon occurs.  But they will bloviate and obfuscate a lot.

Yes, gang, I'm off topic.  I merely state that we don't understand every phenomenon in the universe.  Maybe there is something about numbers we don't know.

Sam



Nickmsi

Hi Rocky . .  Two Cat . .

I too love "voodoo roulette", patterns, trends et al, and of course I love to test systems, theories etc.

I have attached a Tracking Zero Tracker for you all to enjoy. 

Every time a Zero is spun, it records the 10 previous numbers and then adds them up so you can see at a glance which of the 36 numbers appear most frequently.

Simply press Function Key F9 for another set of 1000 spins.

The numbers were generated via an internal RNG, however, if you wish to verify the results with live spins, simply cut and paste them into the program.

Cheers . . . Nick

















Rocky


Hi TwoCatSam and Forum

What I mean together when I said 7 and 2,.... is exactly that, 7 is spun first and straight after that is 2 spun.

I went through one of my old books with roulette card 2 Table AR02 date 18/9/10 and saw this, (this example help you understand what is actually going on here I believe.

okay first is 34, then 27, then 6, you might say "so what" look closer at their position on the wheel.
number 27 is only two positions from 34, number 6 is one away from 34, Thirty-four happens to be one of the six numbers I mentioned earlier in tracking zero's.

Can you see that for the sake of purposes you could "almost" say that 34 hit three times in row (even though it didn't literally) BECAUSE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE NEXT NUMBER OUT, ITS 26 which is one position off Zero! So we have at this stage 34, 27, 6, 26.

Looking at the next seven numbers spun after that, is 17, 28, 20, 20, 23, 29, 0.
Once again, the 28 is one position from the 7 on the wheel, (if we say 7, 20, 20 instead for the sake of argument) that is a very Strong pattern indeed and the following result of "Zero" proves it to me.

Are you beginning to see, its the relationship of the position of where the ball lands associated with prior spins or "landings of the ball", that predict where the ball has a high probability of landing in the next 12 spins on average.

Cheers Rocky

TwoCatSam 2,23, 22 that I Wouldn't consider a pattern BECAUSE THERE'S NOT a repeat of a same number, if it was 2,23,2  or 22, 23, 22 I would. Your other example is different 2 x x 22, if one of the x positions was any number from the list of six numbers i.e. 2, 20, 7, 34, 36, 22 that's a definite strong pattern (e.g. 2, 7, x 22) or (2, x 20,22). As I said in a previuos post four of these numbers together seems to cancel this affect.

In an earlier post I gave a basic example that ALSO can track zero but was not related to the list of six specific outlined but can track Zero also and I gave an e.g. of 16 8 16 (an alternate repeat number pattern), hope this clarifies this for you TwoCatSam. All the Best Mate!


Rocky

-