good design cool

[gizmotron]

OK, so let's get to the bottom of something else while we wait for one informed practitioner of the system to come forward and fill out my form on how to look back a few spins.

Has there been one regular poster that has learned this system yet. All we have are new posters that can do it. Is that true? I didn't bother to do a forensic study of those that claim to know how this works yet.  That should be the next investigation. Now if there is a credible poster here that knows how to do this then that person should go to the dummies thread and fill in the form. Why can't the usual posters figure this out?

[Mr Chips]

OK, so let's get to the bottom of something else while we wait for one informed practitioner of the system to come forward and fill out my form on how to look back a few spins.

Has there been one regular poster that has learned this system yet. All we have are new posters that can do it. Is that true? I didn't bother to do a forensic study of those that claim to know how this works yet.  That should be the next investigation. Now if there is a credible poster here that knows how to do this then that person should go to the dummies thread and fill in the form. Why can't the usual posters figure this out?

I am only guessing, but perhaps some members here are not that keen on people like you posting
unpleasant remarks about this forum over at GG, surely you remember the remarks you made there.
Then there are the remarks made against me and Signum.

Do you think in the circumstances the members here should be queueing up to answer your questions.

No doubt you will then return to GG and post how stupid we all have been to answer your questions.

[Landis]

Mr. Chips,

Numerous people are emailing me this and asking if this is your patent.  Well?


nolinks://nolinks.wikipatents.com/4077631.html-2

[gizmotron]

Mr Chips, imagine how wonderful for you it will be to have me proven wrong. Where's that missing link? If a majority of the people here are newbies to Roulette and gambling then they must go through the period of discovery where they discover that systems don't work and why they don't work. It's easy to pull the wool over some people's eye's. You might be a fraud. The general consensus is still out.

[gizmotron]

Let's come at this from another angle. Suppose that MR Chips has really built a system that works the way that is being published at this forum says it does. Several of us are going to have mud on our faces. Mr Chips is going to be seen on all the academic magazine covers. He will be interviewed on Oprah. Of course he will have to explain his free system on TV to millions of listeners. That will be worth watching just as one of the most unbelievable displays of entertainment seen anywhere in years. And the casinos. This must apply to all even chance betting methods that apply to all table games that have them. So thousands of people are going to be unemployed during a global recession. Yeah, everyone is going to love and respect Mr Chips.

[Landis]

It's legal to cut and paste parts of his system for discussion on the messageboards.  Don't let ignorance get in the way.  We can legally do so and discuss the system with others as we see fit.

[gizmotron]

It's also legal to scam suckers by pretending to have something revolutionary that works. To present it as free. To sell advise to anyone that comes begging. It's covered under buyer beware common sense.

[gizmotron]

"there is no speciufic rule how far to look back .."

There was one example of looking back. Can someone show an example of a 20 spin sample where the distance looking back is shown & explained?

Anyone's opinion or set of facts is welcome.

Could a numerical value for this table's last item (...) be filled in for each row? To fill it out, just use quote in your post. It will show the table already formatted properly.

[table=,]
Row,G or R,+/-/0,P or M,Units +/-,(looked back# spins)
1,G,,,,(...)
2,R,-1,,,(...)
3,G,-2,P+1,,(...)
4,G,-1,OOO,,(...)
5,R,-2,P+1,,(...)
6,R,-1,P+2,-1,(...)
7,R,0,P+1,-2,(...)
8,R,+1,,,(...)
9,G,0,OOO,-3,(...)
10,R,-1,M-1,,(...)
11,G,-2,M-2,-2,(...)
12,G,-1,M-1,-3,(...)
13,G,0,M-2,-2,(...)
14,R,-1,M-1,-1,(...)
15,R,0,OOO,-2,(...)
16,G,-1,P+1,,(...)
17,G,0,P+2,-1,(...)
18,R,-1,P+3,0,(...)
19,R,0,P+4,+1,(...)
20,R,+1,P+3,0,(...)
21,G,0,P+4,+1,(...)
22,G,+1,P+5,0,(...)
23,R,O,P+6,+1,(...)
24,R,+1,P+7,+2,(...)
[/table]

[Mr Chips]

Mr Chips, imagine how wonderful for you it will be to have me proven wrong. Where's that missing link? If a majority of the people here are newbies to Roulette and gambling then they must go through the period of discovery where they discover that systems don't work and why they don't work. It's easy to pull the wool over some people's eye's. You might be a fraud. The general consensus is still out.

I expected people like you and your buddy spike and the usual GG crowd to ridicule Signum it's par for
the course. There is one interesting aspect of Signum that you and your buddies continually overlook
in your eagerness to condemn it as nonsense. I explained this in the "constructive criticism" thread
a little while back. You all say it can't work. OK then obviously it has to lose. What you have to consider
is how will it lose, bearing in mind the explanation I gave in the "cc" thread.

[gizmotron]

It's not usual that anyone gets to interview such a distinguished luminary of the gambling world in our own home arena. So why is that you can write sensibly in this discussion and that your pathetic attempt to make sense with your grand achievement is so embarrassing an example to common sense? The difference is staggering. Perhaps it's just your well practiced complaint about GG. I wonder when someone with credibility will come forward to back your claims. You must realize that proof leads directly to Oprah.

[Mr Chips]

It's not usual that anyone gets to interview such a distinguished luminary of the gambling world in our own home arena. So why is that you can write sensibly in this discussion and that your pathetic attempt to make sense with your grand achievement is so embarrassing an example to common sense? The difference is staggering. Perhaps it's just your well practiced complaint about GG. I wonder when someone with credibility will come forward to back your claims. You must realize that proof leads directly to Oprah.

Now don't forget, you will have to consider, how is Signum going to lose?

[simon]

ok I'm not going to keep jumping in to defend Mr. Chips, it's his problem and he can deal with it himself, I only want to make 2 points in regards to the above comments and that's it, and they are:  1)  I don't know why you guys keep accusing him of "scamming" people when his system is offered for free, take it or leave it; and 2) let's say his system actually works (on some level or other), no he is not going to be on TV and no the casinos are not going to have any worries concerning his system because I'm sure it would be such a tiny percentage of the millions of people who lose their money daily at the casinos that would actually want to study, practice, believe in and play this system that the effect would be negligible to say the least.  come on, even people who are obsessed with this game (like me/us) don't want to deal with his system (like me/and others), and we represent just a tiny percentage of all the serious and/or recreational and/or tourist gamblers who walk in and out of casinos every day.  if I were a casino owner and had a look at this system and accompanying threads, answers and questions I would say "yeah, good luck, keep dreaming, bring it on, this looks like quite a bit of nonsense."  I mean really, most people are too busy and/or lazy to want to begin to try and fathom this system (like me) and do not want to waste time on (perceived to be) useless gambling systems.  which is why the casinos have nothing to worry about and Mr. Chips will not be putting Oprah and the veiwing audience to sleep with his explanation of the system, and the gambling world is not going to change, even if his system works.

[TwoCatSam]

simon

If you have $100,000 and a system that works, Vegas will give you two things:  A plane ticket and a room!

I totally agree with your position.

Sam

[simon]

I look forward to your un-biased assessment of the system, Sam.

[gizmotron]

This is getting funny now. Where is that missing link? Where is there anyone that can answer questions or that can rewrite this so that normal people can understand it?

BTW, I'll get you that booking on Oprah Mr Chips. Never before in the history of the world has something with these level of results, that has come so far, been reveled. Ever heard of Edward Thorp? He so changed the world over night that the game changed. This applies to all even chance games, not just Blackjack. There will be a math book taught at MIT. This might change celestial mechanics. This is a best selling book at least.

[gizmotron]

-