Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

good design cool

Started by Landis, November 14, 2009, 06:22:38 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Landis

lynx lij27 insulated jacket this forum has got good design keep it up.

Marven

I think the Signum system is not properly tested. By that I mean no statistical significance has been established and published and therefore the system cannot be described as a long-term winner that would work for anyone properly using it.

If the system is truly mechanical it should be possible to have it coded by a professional and real tests conducted. If the published results are statistically significant, you would get famous Richard. Why isn't this happening and why do you chose to rely on insignificant hand-testing? I've seen systems win for a surprisingly long time before they end up losing. Positive fluctuations are a reality.

One more thing I disagree with is Richard's opinion that winning methods are necessarily complex. In my opinion this is not true. Simple approaches are the best (notice that I did not say "easy" but simple).

Marv

Mr Chips

Quote from: Landis on November 14, 2009, 06:22:38 PM
I think I need to point something out here:

Just because we have P +4 or M-3, or whatever value, the odds of red or black hitting on the next spin haven't changed.  Not even a little bit.  The odds remain 18/37! 

Mr. Chips, you've chosen to use the name Signum.   You imply that you're a math guy with your Ps and Ms, until you are confronted with some very basic questions about your system, like what's the edge? How many units does it make per spin? etc.  What gives?

-Landis
(By the way, I'm a real math guy, not a pretend one.)

First of all I am not a Maths guy implied or otherwise. I do however know a couple of mathematicians and
they certainly don't have your attitude. If they come across  a problem like Signum they will examine it
in some detail and then ask pertinent questions.

I have no interest in this thread as I consider it a waste of time. If you don't like the Signum system
that's ok, if you don't have the intellectual capability to understand the system that's ok

You seem the type of guy who would be more at home on a maths forum.

winkel

Hi Mr. Chips,

he couldn´t get me, now he is trying to get you.

What is that a mathematician who stops learning after he found 1+1=2?
and refuses to think further

br
winkel

xman1970

Hey Guys,

Landis has been polite, asked fair questions & posted a separate thread to state that he didn't think certain systems worked.


Like him or not, like his questions or not, it's all above board

Let's keep it that way pls  :good:


Thanking everyone in advance  8)

Landis

Since Winkel has locked his thread so that I can't post there, I guess I'm stuck posting here.  

Winkel,

You're English is fine.  As a matter of fact, it's good enough that you've managed to post more than 75 pages written in English.

Here's what I've decided to do, since my posts here are censored.  I've decided that we'll post both systems: The GUT, and Mr. Chips systems on nolinks://nolinks.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=70  I should have the thread posted by tomorrow.    I'll also post it on Gambler's Glen.

Let's see what the rest of the world thinks about both SYSTEMS.  


-Landis
(A real math guy.  Not one of the pretend ones.)

winkel

Quote from: Landis on November 14, 2009, 08:11:31 PM
Since Winkel has locked his thread so that I can't post there, I guess I'm stuck posting here.  

Winkel,

You're English is fine.  As a matter of fact, it's good enough that you've managed to post more than 75 pages written in English.

Here's what I've decided to do, since my posts here are censored.  I've decided that we'll post both systems: The GUT, and Mr. Chips systems on nolinks://nolinks.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=70  I should have the thread posted by tomorrow.    I'll also post it on Gambler's Glen.

Let's see what the rest of the world thinks about both SYSTEMS.  


-Landis
(A real math guy.  Not one of the pretend ones.)

Hi Landis,

I didn´t close the topic.
But I have unlocked it again, don´t know what happened, or how this happened. It was not meant to censor you.

br
winkel

I don´t like that you will post my strategy on Gamblers Glen.
I just don´t like that Forum and I will not become a member there nor discuss anything.

br
winkel

elmo

Landis,

I am not really a maths person, but what would this strategy or indeed any strategy have to accomplish to be deemed a long term winner?

It would be appreciated if you can help me.

Mr Chips

Quote from: Winkel on November 14, 2009, 07:47:47 PM
Hi Mr. Chips,

he couldn´t get me, now he is trying to get you.

What is that a mathematician who stops learning after he found 1+1=2?
and refuses to think further

br
winkel

Hi Winkel,

If you look through the posts of this character Landis you will discover a similarity to a certain
nuisance, that used to post here and waste everyone's time with his monotonous "gamblers
fallacy"

I hope he is aware of copyright.

Regards

Richard

Lohnro


Landis

Regarding copyright.  You can't copyright a gambling system.  So I'm not worried about posting it.

simon

Quote from: Landis on November 14, 2009, 08:11:31 PM
Here's what I've decided to do, since my posts here are censored.  I've decided that we'll post both systems: The GUT, and Mr. Chips systems on nolinks://nolinks.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=70  I should have the thread posted by tomorrow.    I'll also post it on Gambler's Glen.

Let's see what the rest of the world thinks about both SYSTEMS.  


-Landis
(A real math guy.  Not one of the pretend ones.)
........ what is that supposed to accomplish?  I'm sure a physics forum would have no interest in the system or even roulette for that matter, and it is an insult to Mr. Chips to post his system at gg which is ridiculous, do you really need opinions from people at gg to help you decide if Mr. Chips system has any merit or not?  Why don't you just decide for yourself if it's worth spending any time with or not and if you think it's worthless and other people want to spend time with it that's their problem.  I'm sure we could find plenty of people, at your physics forum, math forum and/or anywhere, that would say gambling and roulette and anything you have to offer as well are a waste of time too.  Mr. Chips decided to post his system and advise people about it here, not at gg.  It is not your business to post it at gg.  that is a rather obnoxious thing to do and will accomplish nothing,  maybe you should just hang out there and keep having the same conversation over and over again that they've had there for years:  1) post anything; 2) get bashed for being a system seller; 3) repeat, ad nauseum.

Landis


simon

I believe Mr. Chips system works for him, but it probably wouldn't work for me.  Perhaps sometimes you cannot prove or disprove something, perhaps sometimes things work, for certain people, "for reasons unknown."  That being said, I think this thread could serve a good purpose, as I for one would certainly be interested in hearing from people who have actually studied the system if they find that it has merit and works, or not.

Landis

Actually it's very simple to prove that it can't work.

Landis

-