Try it!!

[pablos]

Ok Thanks for respond so there is still some problem with this xls file. When saving in Open Office some file as a xls file there is a warning that it may cause some problems but it is weird that problem is only with this file.

[simongae]

pablo

those two sheets work with  open office 3.1

nolinks://uploading.com/files/b9bm15m4/buju_lanky_sf3.xls/ 


nolinks://uploading.com/files/a79497e9/buju_lanky_dozens_12_6_dc2sf3%25282%2529.ods/

Thanks Breeze....

but it does not work to me 
equal errors...    

[sarif]

how do i reset when your ahead

[pablos]

You just have to delete all numbers and start again.

[sarif]

one last thing im still not sure im just playing how is told on the post,do i make bet for example 1st dozen came and then if the chart showing bet 2nd and 3rd dozen do i start my bettings then please clarify.cheers

[pablos]

You just insert first number and then start betting. The first bet is always on the different dozens than the dozen which number came from. When you are in profit then you start from begining. Buju just posted some other calcualtor in new thread maybe he changed some rules I don't know but this is a play according to rules in this thread.

[sarif]

which excel calculator has got the safety break can someone please attach it for me.thanks

[pablos]

As I saw many people had some problem to work these files properly. I made them in some older version of Open Office 2.2.0. You can download it from here:

nolinks://nolinks.oldapps.com/openoffice.php?old_openoffice=5#Download

I don't use english version but I think that it should be ok as well. If the problem still exist I can upload my version of software. I don't know why it is incompatible with newer version of Open Office or excel.

[egames]

can we use this system on no zero table ?  thx

[pablos]

Yes you can use this system on the zero table roulette if you want. I just prefer live roulette than RNG and I assume you think about RNG telling about no zero roulette.

I created some new version where you can change safety break divisor. It is in the cell S7 in the main tab. Safety break divisor should be between 1 and 6 but sheet do the calculations with higher one as well. Safety break between 6 and 12 has some sense although it was intended to be lower or equal 6. Safety break above 12 has no sense at all because then it would be higher then target. Lower safety break means higher profit but higher risk that we will be broke. Safety break 1 means no safety break at all. Higher safety break means lower risk but lower profit also. I like 4, 5 or even higher like 6 or 7 but you can use your own. Previous version had safety break 3 so you have some comparison if you used it.

You can download it from here:

nolinks://uploading.com/files/471bc3ec/buju_lanky_sf3ab.xls/

[Twister43]

Yes you can use this system on the zero table roulette if you want. I just prefer live roulette than RNG and I assume you think about RNG telling about no zero roulette.

I created some new version where you can change safety break divisor. It is in the cell S7 in the main tab. Safety break divisor should be between 1 and 6 but sheet do the calculations with higher one as well. Safety break between 6 and 12 has some sense although it was intended to be lower or equal 6. Safety break above 12 has no sense at all because then it would be higher then target. Lower safety break means higher profit but higher risk that we will be broke. Safety break 1 means no safety break at all. Higher safety break means lower risk but lower profit also. I like 4, 5 or even higher like 6 or 7 but you can use your own. Previous version had safety break 3 so you have some comparison if you used it.

You can download it from here:

nolinks://uploading.com/files/e4ed85cf/buju_lanky_sf3ab.xls/

I would try it but that website doesn't want to play nice haa

[pablos]

another link

nolinks://nolinks.sendspace.com/file/np2u52

[hermes]

This is not an insidebet system you should understand it. I will bet all 3 and win most of the time. Clever progression is the key. The negative side of it if too many zeros come in short period of time! Covering zero all the time is costly.
Hermes

[pablos]

I played for some time with these new safety breaks. I thought that 4 or 5 is really good to use but with these safety breaks there is still possibility that we will be broke. These safety breaks are applied just more often than 2 or 3 and bets are kept lower but in a bad series we need more time to be in plus. I thought about two ways of playing with this system. First method is safety break 1 which means no safety break at all. In this method we don't use reset but we use stop loss and reset when we reach profit or loss which is for example 100 chips. In other words we dont use safety break (we use 1) and we don't stop playing (we don't remove numbers) until we reach profit or loss for example 100 or 200 chips or whatever you want. I think 100 is ok but you can use your own and you just have to stick with it. When you reach this profit or loss then you reset and start new progression. In this method we need at least 50% progressions in plus to be in plus overall. I did some tests and it was hard to say if it was more or less 50% progressions in plus. It was just small sample. You just have to try it yourself but I think that it can be a good method.
The second method is playing with some higher safety break like for example 7. Although there is still a chance to be broke with every safety break there are some better and worse safety breaks. I think that 7 is one of the best for long term playing which means that in the begining we can be very often in minus and we need many bets to be in plus but bets are kept quite low. Earlier I wrote that safety break should be lower or equal 6. Safety break 7 (and everyone between 7 and 12) acts similar like divisor 7 (or any other between 7 and 12) with no safety break. In other words safety break between 7 and 12 in some way replaces divisor. The bad thing about this method is that quite often we meet minus profit in the begining and we need many bets to be in plus that is why it is very hard to use it in live roulette (very long time needed) but not everyone has trust in RNG that is why you have to decide yourself if you want to play this way. In this method you can use some higher stop profit or stop loss like 300, 500 chips or even higher or you can use 100 or 200 from first method or you can play in standard mode and reset whenever you are in profit.

These are just my ideas maybe you have yours. Just try it if you want.

[darrynf]

bet all of them at the Same Time using Lanky 6 point Divisor Plan! reset All of the Bet when you get any profit.  

dozen1 and dozen 2
dozen 2 and dozen 3
dozen 1 and dozen 3

Never lost for 6 weeks!!

I understand what you are saying, i have seen this theory before else where, you use a progression on the losing dozen, system a(1d2d) system b (2d3d) system c (1d3d)
for an example if dozen 2 hits ( system a and b wins) even though you dont gain from the first spin it when you use a progression, thats when you start to gain money.  use a progression on system c and keep the other bets the same.  i tested this theory out over a thousand spins and won all the time but you can still lose and if you do its high.

[darrynf]

-