anybody succes with CashBuilderX Strategy

[Buck]

Ginger, Thank you mate, I want you to have the CBX strategy for free so you can play,test and win . . .
PM your email to me . . .

This is not about money, I just want people to win and win because of my idea

[Mr J]

This entire thread should be deleted, just my opinion.

Ken

[Steve]

Ken, yes I'm with you on that. It shouldnt even be here. The merry trio of what are likely the same person have one chance to prove the system works as he states.

[bombus]

Ok,
I've received a copy of the cbx system - thanks buck, mike, steveg, davo, unclebuck, cashbuilderx...  have I missed anyone?...probably.

I have read over the system and given it a quick test with these 15 numbers.

Buck, can you post the result for betting these 15 numbers so I can see if I'm doing it right? Just the final profit/loss please.

23
1
25
4
16
17
19
0
15
17
15
3
12
29
24

My first impression is that the system is an effective randomizer of both bet selection and staking, which without the benefit of extensive testing I would have to say is a break even proposition.

It also requires a ball's out type of progression that would not be in everyone's comfort zone. Having said that, the system does have a stop loss of sorts.

Buck, have I got this right - the first bet for any new session is always 6 units?

I will give it a good test over the next week or so and report back. Maybe the real Mike will already have it coded and tested before I finish.  

[bombus]

@ Ginger,

Take it easy mate. I deleted your last post, keep it civil. 

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Ok it took me a little while to fully understand, practice and get the hang of it.  I completed several sessions and my results are looking pretty close to what the author is claiming.  I won about 6 out of 10.  I will do more testing to see how well it holds up.

[Ginger]

Dear Sirs,

I am a member of this forum for a couple of months now but the way you tried people is not my cup of tea.
A simple question is turning in a bad way.

The reason I be a member is to learn from each other ...but this is terrible.

So I finish my membership by this forum and wish you all the luck in the world, it is a pity because I just wanted to give you a hell of a system for free.

Peace roulette brothers.

John            The Netherlands

[Mr J]

It is a bit funny though. One guy, multiple user names........having conversations with oneself. The BEST (not the only) members to get advice/results on methods are the guys (not AP) that have been around for quite a while. Sorry but its true. ((There is a 'new' guy at GG, I know exactly who it is))

Ken

[Mr J]

FUTURE REFERENCE for NEWER members here>> The best way to give away a system for FREE.......post it and ALL the rules of how to play. My opinion, do NOT post results and do NOT post even if you think the method is great. Leave all that out.


Ken

[Steve]

Ginger, understand what Buck/Mike/SteveG have done here (all same person): spammed, and given self-reviews for a product. The actual product is complete nonsense. The seller contradicts himself about whether the system actually wins.

You wonder why he is attacked. Because people dont like scammers. The attacks against him are mostly justified. We are all tired of system sellers coming along promising a system that wins more than it loses, deceptively advertising, and providing nothing. People dont like it.

And ginger you said "it is a pity because I just wanted to give you a hell of a system for free."

Nevermind though, we have buck's other great system.

Buck/Mike, it is not a personal thing.

As for your actual system, you dont need to code it in RX. I just did this myself: use MS excel to creat random RB's. Then use the countif function to determine where the sequence occurs. Then use it again to determine how many times R or B occurs in the sequence. Then we count the number of times R or B occur. The result? No edge.

In other words, your sequence and system is complete nonsense as expected. Test it for yourself.

Now you kind of scoffed at my mention of LONG TERM, as if to say "well nobody plays a million spins". True, but let's put it into context. You have a million people that each play one round with your system. How many win, and how many lose? I mean they are all playing short term, right? The end result is the combined bankroll is a clear loss. that is the long term, in context.

Any system can beat roulette short term. That doesn't mean it is a legitimate winning system.

In the end, you got away with murder on this and other forums. You spammed, gave self-reviews before being caught out, contradicted yourself, and did it all over the internet as I can now see. The way it is being advertised alone makes it a scam. But if the system itself was worth something, it may be forgiveable. But the system itself is nonsense. I suggest whip up a quick excel chart and see it for yourself. Use the countif function.

You come across as someone who may have thought he had something, although he never significantly tested it. But he tried to sell it anyway. Then he created fictional characters to spam and self-review it. Your ebay reviews are no doubt much the same - very easy to buy ebay reviews.

Again dont take it personally. Understand why people dont approve of you, and they have every right to feel this way.

[iggiv]

folks, i suggest let's forget what happened except the test results....that's most important

[ADulay]

Buck, have I got this right - the first bet for any new session is always 6 units?

That's the way I see it here, too.

AD

[Buck]

Hey Bombus
Well yes youre right 6 units, the first bet is counted but isnt as such. You know what i mean.
On those numbers you would have had 8 completions (16 units)
and one side is still in progress (not the best example)

AND for the record, GINGER is not me . . GEEZ . . hes from netherlands, but im sure you guys still will think that!

[Buck]

I really feel like people are searching for the impossible. NOTHING will work ALL THE TIME, but this works so bloody effectively every time you go and play. Thats my whole point. . . . Stick to the rules and you will come out ahead. Be prepared to have the losing sessions, top up and start again.

We know it works! theres at least 3 people on this thread, Tic TAC, I I I I I I, A.D who have all tried it with great results.

I play this way EVERY DAY, tried to share it and been just nailed . . .

Everyone is just missing the point . . .

Not one person has TESTED and come back and shown a negative RESULT . .NOT ONE . . . .

Strange huh? After this many posts . . .you would  think someone would have wanted me to be shown the door . .

WHY??? Cause it works . . . it WINS MONEY! Effortlessly

Happy gambling CBX users

[bombus]

To be fair I haven't posted any results yet because I got slam dunked on my first session - down $330 = 66 units (take away the 130 I was up and it's down $460). It might have been that I made mistakes, so it is a bit premature for conclusions. I will replay the session.

I stopped as per instructions because I could not afford the next bet. I have not topped up and continued yet, so perhaps things will turn around.

I did not want to post any details until I gave it a fair run. So don't expect to hear anything from me for a while.

[bombus]

-