. . . So why aren t there a lot of posts and Topics ? :)
Quote from: Psolaras on March 16, 2011, 08:27:55 PM
. . . So why aren t there a lot of posts and Topics ? :)
Because all systems have been covered. If a new system comes up it is just a variance of an old system. Most people know deep inside of them that no system can beat roulette. As long as there are new guys coming in, the same ideas (allbeit structured slightly different) will surface again. Someone said a while back that 'so-what if GF is just that, GF. It is still a betting method for him. Does anyone see the irony in this?
It's similar to this example.
Steven Hawkins doing a mathematical calculation about blackholes. On page 2 of the calculation he realizes a flaw in the calculation yet continues with the remainder of the 70 page calculation saying, "oh well, I know that on page 2 there was a huge flaw but F*ck it! Let's continue with it! Who cares if it's wrong? It works for me!" This never happened just a comparison with the GF guy. ;D
:) You might think it's working. In the longterm it won't. There are nothing new in playing repeats and cold numbers. Either by themselves or combined. It has been done in every way possible.
Very nice results.
The thing is that for the next 600k spins you could be down $700 000
;D I know roulette can be beaten. Just not with systems. ::)
There were some systems here (one of them was the "Perfect balance system") that was also about combination of Cold and hot numbers of 37 spins cycle.
This system particularly was a BIG winner in about 12. 000 spins !
After 12. 000 more spins It was way DOWN !
Look at the Topic of this system and you will see that those nice days in VLC ppl thought that this would be the HG of Roulette. . . .
In the end like all systems . . . it was only LUCK!
I hope your system will hold on mate. . . . But Maths say that it will lose on the LR.
Zindrod and shoeposter are one of the biggester loosters here i have ever seen. Nice to met them. It was funny. THere are enogh systems and brains who can win a little.
Quote from: money13 on March 18, 2011, 07:21:31 AM
Zindrod and shoeposter are one of the biggester loosters here I have ever seen. Nice to met them. It was funny. THere are enogh systems and brains who can win a little.
;D Whatever makes you sleep at night bunny... I mean Money. :sarcastic:
the point is you will never play 1 million spins in a casino, you play a couple of hundred or what ever.
This is irrelevant !
Because you do not know when the bad fluxuation will come!
So even if you will just play 300 spins. . . you can hit the bad RUN of your system and lose big time.
In time you will understand that and you will remember my words.
Zindrod BTW is a man that knows a lot about roulette. It can be easily understood from his posts.
1. 600 units is a very risky loss. . . if you ask me.
My friend I am just giving you my point of view based on my expirience. . .
I don t have anything againts you!
After all we are all here for the same goal :give_heart:
Quote from: darrynf on March 18, 2011, 08:16:44 AM
if you know what the bigest loss can be then you know what to expect.
I know it can reach 12 losses in arow and I know thats 1600 units, the fact is it makes more then it losses but what ever.
you dont get it.
The thing is that you can have successive '12 losses in a row' Quite a hole.
Quote from: darrynf on March 18, 2011, 08:26:18 AM
1600 units, not if the size of the units is .10 or .01
I dont think we are here for the same thing, im here to win, you are here to guess.
on the test yes that was the progression of a 4 steps.
I dont play like that I use 1,1,2,4 (something like that), I switch between repeats and new numbers. the test was done for a simple version on 600 thousand spins with profits of 700,000k. that tells me it has potential.
anyway believe what you want. to me you are just another maui
That is usually one of the first steps...
reducing the chip size.
If your system worked and truly was unbeatable you wouldn't care about playing 0,1 or 0,01 chips. Just play $100 chips. Why F*ck around? If a system cannot come out ahead in the longrun flatbetting, it sure as hell won't come out ahead using a progression. Progressions are for fools and really it's just an eyeblind.
It doesn't matter whether you skip around between new numbers and repeaters and back again. It does not change a thing.
Your +/- 18 numbers you play are no different from playing any 18 numbers and using a LW strategy.
1st of all MAUI is a clever member that he speaks the Truth!
2nd Its shame on you speaking like this. . . because I didn t attack you and i ll not do it either now.
Go to the PERFECT BALLANCE Topic and you will see that this system is superior than yours snd it still lost.
Live your fantasy my friend. . . all the expirienced members passed through this period when they were newbies. . . . it was great period I must admit! :)
Quote from: Psolaras on March 18, 2011, 08:33:38 AM
1st of all MAUI is a clever member that he speaks the Truth!
2nd Its shame on you speaking like this. . . because I didn t attack you and I ll not do it either now.
Go to the PERFECT BALLANCE Topic and you will see that this system is superior than yours snd it still lost.
Live your fantasy my friend. . . all the expirienced members passed through this period when they were newbies. . . . it was great period I must admit! :)
Wasn't it just that? A great period and a fantasy at that.
Yes man!
To tell you the truth I am a little jeleus of his passion and hopes....
But after some years he will come to the hard truth as we know it!
Its glad to see that there are expirienced and logical members here mate! I don t feel alone anymore..hehhe
Darren. Take any 18 numbers Let's say every second street. Play those with LW strategy and jump between that and the other streets. There will be no difference.
Quote from: Psolaras on March 18, 2011, 08:38:29 AM
Yes man!
To tell you the truth I am a little jeleus of his passion and hopes....
But after some years he will come to the hard truth as we know it!
Its glad to see that there are expirienced and logical members here mate! I don t feel alone anymore..hehhe
Thank you. Yes. Darren will get to the levels where you realize that bet selection based on past numbers are absolutely useless. Only if you can have a superior bet selection (based on the physical aspect of the game) will you be able to negate the house edge. Yes though. You are right I miss those days of passionately searching for the HG. What I don't miss is the time wasted on it. :whistle:
Zindrod I admire ut passion to try and convince a newbie about roulette....
I suggest you not to spend ur time in that.....if you can rememeber even YOU when you were a newbie in this passion and great period you wouldn t beleave anyone if he would told that roulette can t been beaten.!
its like adolescence.....if the years will not pass...you can t get away from it!!!!! :-D :haha:
Quote from: Psolaras on March 18, 2011, 08:45:51 AM
Zindrod I admire ut passion to try and convince a newbie about roulette....
I suggest you not to spend ur time in that.....if you can rememeber even YOU when you were a newbie in this passion and great period you wouldn t beleave anyone if he would told that roulette can t been beaten.!
its like adolescence.....if the years will not pass...you can t get away from it!!!!! :-D :haha:
hahahahaha. Yes do I remember. Actually feel embarressed about it today but yes once you understand the math then Bob's your Uncle. ;D
Yes man.
I kinda feel embarassed too!
I was trying to convince the expirienced memebers that 1+1 = 3...... LOLOLOL :haha:
years bring winsdom ;)
Quote from: darrynf on March 18, 2011, 08:47:21 AM
@ zindrod
I ask you if it makes profit at flat betting then what ?
will you shut up
I dont know the system for perfect balance and dont care. im wasting my time here I think. by the way I never said it was the h.g, thats your words not mine.
I told you from the start you are wasting your time.
It has to win flatbetting it and it has to win in the long term. More than one system has won over hundreds of thousands of spins only to go bang eventually.
So you say, "I'm not going to play millions of spin blah blah blah." As rightly pointed out though. It might just all crash horribly the very day you play this for real money. And continue to fail for the next million spins.
Quote from: darrynf on March 18, 2011, 08:50:33 AM
I get it, you are trying to antaganise me.
I see.
well good luck guys, if I thought like you then I wouldnt be here. why talk about something you lose at all the time.
Darren, nobody is trying to antagonize you. Just pointing out the facts.
Live you fantacy man...Its ur best time now ! I really mean it.....just play with 0.1 chips....You don t have to expirience the ungly truth by losing a lot of ur hard earned job money......
I will not continue this converstation with you anymore,,,,time is the only thing that will show you all....then we will just be the voices that we were telling you the truth. When you will find out the truth through years,you don t have to ask for an appology to us...No need,we didn t ask appology either.
Best of luck to you!
One more thing Darren before I go have a couple of cold ones. You do not know whether Psolaras or myself or both of us are successful roulette players or not. "Look before you leap" :)
Cheers and good luck to you. ;)
Quote from: darrynf on March 18, 2011, 09:01:36 AM
you are just pissing me off now. I have no care for wannabies.
you know nothing about me but you throw accusations about me.
im finding it hard to hold my toung with this one.
I dont live in a fantasy world, its real. maybe you gotten beaten a long time ago and if you cant win no one can. full of bull shit.
I did like you zindrod but you decided to get personal, anyway I will be deleting my system of here. it works, I make room for it to lose. it dose but I make more.
Please point out to me where I became personal. Don't get your panties all tied up. :)
I will say goodbye again then. Those cold ones are still waiting.