I can see everyday at least 30 members online anytime I check...so....

[Psolaras]

. . . So why aren t there a lot of posts and Topics ?

[Zindrod]

. . . So why aren t there a lot of posts and Topics ?

Because all systems have been covered. If a new system comes up it is just a variance of an old system. Most people know deep inside of them that no system can beat roulette. As long as there are new guys coming in, the same ideas (allbeit structured slightly different) will surface again. Someone said a while back that 'so-what if GF is just that, GF. It is still a betting method for him. Does anyone see the irony in this?

It's similar to this example.

Steven Hawkins doing a mathematical calculation about blackholes. On page 2 of the calculation he realizes a flaw in the calculation yet continues with the remainder of the 70 page calculation saying, "oh well, I know that on page 2 there was a huge flaw but F*ck it! Let's continue with it! Who cares if it's wrong? It works for me!" This never happened just a comparison with the GF guy. 

[Zindrod]

  You might think it's working. In the longterm it won't. There are nothing new in playing repeats and cold numbers. Either by themselves or combined. It has been done in every way possible.

[Zindrod]

Very nice results.

The thing is that for the next 600k spins you could be down $700 000

[Zindrod]

  I know roulette can be beaten. Just not with systems. 

[Psolaras]

There were some systems here (one of them was the "Perfect balance system") that was also about combination of Cold and hot numbers of 37 spins cycle.   
This system particularly was a BIG winner in about 12.   000 spins !
After 12.   000 more spins It was way DOWN !

Look at the Topic of this system and you will see that those nice days in VLC ppl thought that this would be the HG of Roulette.   .   .   .   
In the end like all systems .   .   .   it was only LUCK!

I hope your system will hold on mate.   .   .   .   But Maths say that it will lose on the LR.   

[money13]

Zindrod and shoeposter are one of the biggester loosters here i have ever seen. Nice to met them. It was funny. THere are enogh systems and brains who can win a little.

[Zindrod]

Zindrod and shoeposter are one of the biggester loosters here I have ever seen. Nice to met them. It was funny. THere are enogh systems and brains who can win a little.

Whatever makes you sleep at night bunny... I mean Money. 

[Psolaras]

the point is you will never play 1 million spins in a casino, you play a couple of hundred or what ever.   

This is irrelevant !
Because you do not know when the bad fluxuation will come!

So even if you will just play 300 spins.  .  .  you can hit the bad RUN of your system and lose big time. 

In time you will understand that and you will remember my words. 

Zindrod BTW is a man that knows a lot about roulette.   It can be easily understood from his posts. 

[Psolaras]

1.   600 units is a very risky loss.   .   .   if you ask me.   

My friend I  am just giving you my point of view based on my expirience.   .   .   
I don t  have anything againts you!

After all we are all here for the same goal  

[Zindrod]

if you know what the bigest loss can be then you know what to expect.

I know it can reach 12 losses in arow and I know thats 1600 units, the fact is it makes more then it losses but what ever.

you dont get it.

The thing is that you can have successive '12 losses in a row' Quite a hole.

[Zindrod]

1600 units, not if the size of the units is .10 or .01

I dont think we are here for the same thing, im here to win, you are here to guess.

on the test yes that was the progression of a 4 steps.


I dont play like that I use 1,1,2,4 (something like that), I switch between repeats and new numbers. the test was done for a simple version on 600 thousand spins with profits of 700,000k. that tells me it has potential.

anyway believe what you want. to me you are just another maui

That is usually one of the first steps...
reducing the chip size.

If your system worked and truly was unbeatable you wouldn't care about playing 0,1 or 0,01 chips. Just play $100 chips. Why F*ck around? If a system cannot come out ahead in the longrun flatbetting, it sure as hell won't come out ahead using a progression. Progressions are for fools and really it's just an eyeblind.

It doesn't matter whether you skip around between new numbers and repeaters and back again. It does not change a thing.

Your +/- 18 numbers you play are no different from playing any 18 numbers and using a LW strategy.

[Psolaras]

1st of all MAUI is a clever member that he speaks the Truth!
2nd Its shame on you speaking like this. . . because I didn t attack you and i ll not do it either now.

Go to the PERFECT BALLANCE Topic and you will see that this system is superior than yours snd it still lost.

Live your fantasy my friend. . . all the expirienced members passed through this period  when they were newbies. . . . it was great period I must admit!  

[Zindrod]

1st of all MAUI is a clever member that he speaks the Truth!
2nd Its shame on you speaking like this. . . because I didn t attack you and I ll not do it either now.

Go to the PERFECT BALLANCE Topic and you will see that this system is superior than yours snd it still lost.

Live your fantasy my friend. . . all the expirienced members passed through this period  when they were newbies. . . . it was great period I must admit!  

Wasn't it just that? A great period and a fantasy at that. 

[Psolaras]

Yes man!
To tell you the truth I am a little jeleus of his passion and hopes....

But after some years he will come to the hard truth as we know it!

Its glad to see that there are expirienced and logical members here mate! I don t feel alone anymore..hehhe

[Psolaras]

-