If someone is a genuine player and doesn't profit, on my forum, provided they dont break forum rules, I will not ban them. If they have permission before posting and revealing they are a player, they will not be banned as a player. If they do it without permission, then yes they will be banned. I will not delete their posts. I will allow them to state their case and/or claims that I'm a scammer if that's what they believe, and in a logical process I will state my case. Then people can decide for themselves. but the problem is the people attacking me have 'other motives', and for them it is not a matter of truth. Take mark howe, bago and forester for example - can you see any of them saying anything even REMOTELY positive about me? Or am I Satan himself according to them?
As for my players, not all are successful - I have always said this. Advantage play is legitimate, but it's not for all people - it is not like betting red/black. What makes the difference between success and failure is the player - how frequently they seek support, their communication with me, their effort, and whether or not they have expectations of winning $1m blindfolded without effort. I care very much about the success of my players. I am an honest person. What usually gives me a bad name is when a player breaches the contracts, I ban them - I am very strict on this. And when they are banned, they tend to go all-out attacking me. There have been numerous different cases with unhappy players on the warpath, and when they are on that path, the truth is quite irrelevant to them.
