Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

4 Number betting system

Started by Camel, May 18, 2008, 08:25:13 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

studyolic

@cps10
lemme see if I can dig out the sheets.....  off to  work now so it won't be until this evening.

Richard.

studyolic

@cps10

here's a session;   Gavin at jebet,   2.00pm on 26/5/08

26
21
3
8
1
36
22
10
19
22
16
16
21
12
28
30
26
8
1
4
2
4
35
34
3
3
19
21
36
13
13
22
35
22
2
22
6
30
23   at this point Gavin went away,  so I stopped recording;  He came back to the same table 40 minutes later,  so I went back to the sheet I had been using for him initially,  and just continued with it;
27
24
At this point the only contiguous three numbers remaining were 31,32 and 33,   a street.  So I started betting one unit on each number  (31,32,33); from spin number 42

4
11
8
3
4
17  
20
20   after 8 spins at one unit per number I increase to 2 units per number
15
14
1
36
32  HIT!      -24 and -30  +72= +18 units.      I  found this a rather long and stressful progression,  but the previous night I had won on the very first spin,  so I can't complain.

On the other hand,  I have also had a game where the last 3 contiguous numbers  (in this case 7,8,9)  did not show for the whole of my 15-step progression,  so I stopped at -64 units.     All-in-all I  am still in a negative profit situation with this system.    Dunno,  I may concentrate on Turbo's  first-dozen four-number  method as adapted by Hermes  etc.  I've had a few tests on that,  and the only problem is keeping your nerve long enough!


cps10

Looks good studyolic...I will take a look at the session and see what I can derive with numbers on my end.

hermes

Camel, where did you read that to have only 4 sleepers take 15 to 20 spins? It takes to 70 and more spins to see only 4 sleepers.
Hermes

bjb007

And also if they're the last three contiguous unhit
they're likely to be in the last 4 and they mightn't
hit for so many spins it's not funny.

About the least sensible unhit I believe is six, hence my
"Last 6" prog.

A strange thing too.  Doesn't seem to make any
difference (at least on an RNG) whether it gets
down to the last six in 50 spins or 80.  Seems that
one of those last six will hit in a reasonable time.

Is there an explanation for this?

walu

I have only tested the system on one session of 51 spins.  After 32 spins the only progression left was 29 30 31 32 33   5 nos in all, if 30-32 came up there would be no 4no progressions so i  tried it with the 5 nos.  From the 32nd to 51st spins the nos 29-33 were not struck , a run of 19 misses This is probably not a fair test but  the warning bells are there. Walu.

doms

thank for sharing ,i want test it :yahoo:

birdhands

What happened to this thread?  Did you guys test it more?  Did you junk the system?  I'm very curious.

birdhands

-