4 Number betting system

[bloomone2002]

cps10, it would be excellent to get your test feedback on this one. I'm thinking there will be a lot of long progression swings and a few too long to chase. Please let us know what you find out.

Bloom

[Camel]

With win on the 22th spin, u are in minus 122, Yes it happen sometimes. Sometimes I recover it already in same session when I play 3 numbers or I recover it with next session(s). It doesent happen often that I need to play with 10 bet. It should be winning system, Its more like ability to play. Its always combination but it base on sleeping running number areas and progression.

Lets paly more mates

Camel

[Camel]

Hmm and one thing more. Dont play this system on 27 roulette whell. Its much more risky.

Camel

[Camel]

Sorry 37 I mean

[bloomone2002]

Sorry 37 I mean

Huh? So the system is good for American wheel 38 but not for European wheel 37 ?

Please complete the testing of the 235 spin database. You only did the first 57 spins.

[theneophyte]

Cheers Camel [smiley=dankk2.gif]  

tried this for the last two days - made 50 units yesterday and 100 today playing the live european wheel at 32vegas. I changed the progression to 11111122223332255 but I never went past the fifth bet.

Hope it holds out....[smiley=grin.gif]

[Camel]

Nice if people have nice results
No I mean single zero wheel. With double zero there are more numbers and change are less but it should work even on double zero wheel. Had some positive tests but not many. Anyway better is single zero.
Yes I will end this database. Sorry I have been really busy.
Any another results?

Camel

[Camel]

Oki second game from database. Start from 58th number. There wasnt any 4 areas so I played 3 areas until 1 was left. I started to play on 94th spin and bet on 8:9:10. First spin(number 10) was winner, so 33 profit with 1 spin.
I will do next tests but havent time atm. Be pacient plese guys.

Camel

[mystidark]

Cheers Camel [smiley=dankk2.gif]  

tried this for the last two days - made 50 units yesterday and 100 today playing the live european wheel at 32vegas. I changed the progression to 11111122223332255 but I never went past the fifth bet.

Hope it holds out....[smiley=grin.gif]

Hi Theneophyte, ur progression looks interesting but i don't think i quite understand how u'd apply it to this method...could u please give an example, i would much appreciate it...thanks!

Mystidark

[vandijkerwin]

great system,

I will put this to the test!

thanks for sharing!

gr erwin

[theneophyte]

Cheers Camel [smiley=dankk2.gif]  

tried this for the last two days - made 50 units yesterday and 100 today playing the live european wheel at 32vegas. I changed the progression to 11111122223332255 but I never went past the fifth bet.

Hope it holds out....[smiley=grin.gif]

Hi Theneophyte, ur progression looks interesting but i don't think i quite understand how u'd apply it to this method...could u please give an example, i would much appreciate it...thanks!

Mystidark

i bet one unit on each number for six spins then 2 units for 3 spins etc.

i won 76 units yesterday - maximum progression 6 steps.
[smiley=thumbsup.gif]

[studyolic]

I  kept a note of numbers hit while I was playing a 6-sector system.   I got to 36 spins,  and there was one block of four unhit numbers  (36, 0, 1, 2)  and oneblock of three unhit numbers  (25, 26,27) remaining;   I  was nervous about getting into a long progression,  and as I dithered about starting betting,  I noticed that 25,26,27  is a street  (I think that's the correct term),  and so I  could put just one unit on that street for a lower risk / or a longer progression.  While I was working this out,  the block of four numbers was hit by a Zero  and then a 2  a couple of spins later.  So  there's nothing left to look at but this block of three.  I decide to wait to  42 spins before I start betting.  Then I feel it's safe enough to put one unit on each number.   It hit on the very next spin.  So I logged out and checked my numbers again!   I  was playing a live wheel at jebet online.  Took about 1 hour 15 mins,  but I had a few hits with the 6-sector system in that time too.
I'm  a bit nervous about playing the 4 numbers if they appear after only 20 spins or so.  I  feel safer (perhaps erroneously) waiting for 3 unhit numbers alone,  and minimum 36 spins to have gone by. Then I can use a progression of 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 2,2,2,2,2,2.   That's  eight spins at one unit per number and six spins at two units per number,  giving a 14 - step progression.  And waiting until around 40 spins before starting to bet should give more room for a hit.  I think I would quit after the 14th step,  and start a new session.  For sure,  it takes time use this method,  but it's excellent if you are using another system too,  and building a session over an hour or so.  Two methods in parallel  could work well,  IMHO.
Thanks Camel  

Richard.

[theneophyte]

I  kept a note of numbers hit while I was playing a 6-sector system.   I got to 36 spins,  and there was one block of four unhit numbers  (36, 0, 1, 2)  and oneblock of three unhit numbers  (25, 26,27) remaining;   I  was nervous about getting into a long progression,  and as I dithered about starting betting,  I noticed that 25,26,27  is a street  (I think that's the correct term),  and so I  could put just one unit on that street for a lower risk / or a longer progression.  While I was working this out,  the block of four numbers was hit by a Zero  and then a 2  a couple of spins later.  So  there's nothing left to look at but this block of three.  I decide to wait to  42 spins before I start betting.  Then I feel it's safe enough to put one unit on each number.   It hit on the very next spin.  So I logged out and checked my numbers again!   I  was playing a live wheel at jebet online.  Took about 1 hour 15 mins,  but I had a few hits with the 6-sector system in that time too.
I'm  a bit nervous about playing the 4 numbers if they appear after only 20 spins or so.  I  feel safer (perhaps erroneously) waiting for 3 unhit numbers alone,  and minimum 36 spins to have gone by. Then I can use a progression of 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 2,2,2,2,2,2.   That's  eight spins at one unit per number and six spins at two units per number,  giving a 14 - step progression.  And waiting until around 40 spins before starting to bet should give more room for a hit.  I think I would quit after the 14th step,  and start a new session.  For sure,  it takes time use this method,  but it's excellent if you are using another system too,  and building a session over an hour or so.  Two methods in parallel  could work well,  IMHO.
Thanks Camel  

Richard.

does this mean you are waiting for sleepers to hit?

i didn't play that way. as soon as four unhit numbers in a row showed i bet on them. i also carried on marking off numbers and if another set or four came up i bet on that too.

[studyolic]

I'm confused.  

I  thought  "sleepers"   and  "unhit numbers"  were the same thing.  What I have been doing is recording every number that hits over a 36 spin session.  At that point,  I look and see if there are any unhit groups  (ie  consecutive numbers,  such as 7,8,9,10) Usually there is one group of four numbers that has not been hit in the last 36 spins,  and sometimes also two or three groups of three consecutive numbers.  Because I'm a chicken and a crap gambler,  I watch until the group of four is hit,  then I start to bet on the groups of 3  being hit soon.    Have I misunderstood Camel's system?

[cps10]

I'm confused.  

I  thought  "sleepers"   and  "unhit numbers"  were the same thing.  What I have been doing is recording every number that hits over a 36 spin session.  At that point,  I look and see if there are any unhit groups  (ie  consecutive numbers,  such as 7,8,9,10) Usually there is one group of four numbers that has not been hit in the last 36 spins,  and sometimes also two or three groups of three consecutive numbers.  Because I'm a chicken and a crap gambler,  I watch until the group of four is hit,  then I start to bet on the groups of 3  being hit soon.    Have I misunderstood Camel's system?

I like this approach. Do you have session that you can post describing this method of play?

[cps10]

-