Thread starter to be able to delete posts?

[mistarlupo]

Well, what's your opinion?
I'm just curious what do people think about that, nothing more...

Thank you.

Regards,
Lupo

[Diarmaid]

Completely disagree!!!


Thats not how a forum should work, so if someone disagrees with the thread starter then he can just delete the posts,LOL thats stupid.

[Natural9]

Because trhis forum earlier had a lot of disruptive elements it was decided to go that way which I kind of agree with until someone has huge wraps on himself or method he using like in another thread that is hot at the moment

The idea was if some naysayers were to start their own threads refuting claims on another

[Bo0Merang]

if someone disagree  with  other  opinion  it  is  just  about  him  how  he  will  decide  he can  stay on  tread orr FT   simple why  to  make  magic for  other  things  there  are  moderators

[kav]

I agree with the option to delete posts.
It keeps it constructive.
If you disagree with something just ignore it.

[Spike]

All it makes for is speeches and one sided conversations. Who needs that.

[Number Six]

I don't like using the word stupid, but stupid is what this rule is, clearly the vast majority agree. There are enough moderators of this forum now to invade a small country, it's them who should look after the threads not the thread starter. This is how the BS and scams are allowed to become overwhelming.

[TwoCatSam]

All it makes for is speeches and one sided conversations. Who needs that. >>>

I agree with Spike.  


Good Lord!  Spike ended a question with a period.  He's HUMAN!!

[Number Six]

This rule seriously needs to be reversed immediately....unless this form aspires to be scam central and a haven for cyberwhackjobs.

[Mr J]

"I agree with the option to delete posts.
It keeps it constructive.
If you disagree with something just ignore it." >>> I like the option as well. If anything, if you highly disagree with a poster, START your own thread against his/her idea.  Ken

[Lanky]

This rule seriously needs to be reversed immediately....unless this form aspires to be scam central and a haven for cyberwhackjobs.

Six.

This being looked at since Yesterday in the Mods Area where We discuss everything.
We will decide shortly.

I will do a Couple of Topics so that The posts from these two Guys can,t be deleted by Them.
Only the Mods will be able to removed.

Hang on 5 Mins Mate.

Lanky.

[Number Six]

All I think is that people should accept criticism as part of the forum experience, learn to take it on the chin and from there explain why the criticism is wrong or inaccurate, whatever - that is how you get production. Not one thread v another. People need to stop crying about negativity and all that. How are you supposed to get the respect of your peers if you start weeping when someone offers you a challenge? I posted a curt observation of why you can't beat roulette with probability in viper5's thread and he deleted it. It was on topic, it was true and it was removed. Spike is right, all you end up with is pointless threads in which people are glorifying themselves. Where is the discussion?

[Mr J]

"accept criticism" >>> I have no problem accepting it, its part of message boards BUT what about the posters starting trouble, calling people foul names etc.?  Ken

[Number Six]

It should be up to the mods to keep the threads in order and delete abusive posts. Isn't that what they are there for? People lose it sometimes, and that is part of life. You can't eradicate it. Here they get warned, then banned.

[Natural9]

All I think is that people should accept criticism as part of the forum experience, learn to take it on the chin and from there explain why the criticism is wrong or inaccurate, whatever - that is how you get production. Not one thread v another. People need to stop crying about negativity and all that. How are you supposed to get the respect of your peers if you start weeping when someone offers you a challenge? I posted a curt observation of why you can't beat roulette with probability in viper5's thread and he deleted it. It was on topic, it was true and it was removed. Spike is right, all you end up with is pointless threads in which people are glorifying themselves. Where is the discussion?

Sixer

I do agree with you to a point what annoys me about negativity someone will post a strategy and automatically weill get jumped on and the usual crap come out like it wont work nothing works  no explanation just nothing works same ole same ole we need constructive criticism or people will no longer post their ideas for the fear of getting shot down and abused just for the sake of putting ideas down but we not want go other way either

It a tight path the mods have but I would still leave it up to the mods judgement even they get critised for too much censorship as well in lots of cases no one wins

But also another thing is the outrageous claims people have with no evidence of type of bet selection i will give you clues all you need to do is decypher it it all there in coder lol one thread is already ove 8 pages long if you remember one went for over 30 pages of nothing and the we had winwithmath was another

[Natural9]

-