VLS’ Cheating D’Alembert

[admin]

Hello guys, today I want to share my variation on D'alembert for the even chances: The CHEATING one.

Rules are this:

-      On a lose we only move the unit up by +1 unit at a time, as in the standard D'alembert..
-      We always reset to base unit when we tie or reach a new bankroll high.
-      On a win, we can lower MORE than -1 unit at a time using the following criterion:

We compare both, the amount if we take -1 from the last winning bet (as in the standard D'alembert) and the amount of units we are below from the bankroll.

Example:

We start with 200 units.
We place 1 unit and lose.

We have this:
-      D'alembert says: 1 + 1 = 2 as next bet.
-      We are -1 unit below: 1 as next bet.

We chose 1 as our next bet since it is the lower.

-------

Another example:

We were up at 230.
We are currently at 220.

In our stream of bets at this given sample time we are placing 4 units.
We lose -4 and are now at 216.

-      D'alembert says: 4 + 1 = 5 as next bet.
-      We do the math (High bankroll – Current): 230 – 216 = 14 units as next bet.

We always pick the lower, so in this case we pick what D'alembert says: 5 units as next bet.

-------

The third possible example is: at times it will be the same value on both, the D'almbert and the loss units. No brainer. Just use that value.

I.e: You start with 200.
Place 1 unit. Loss.
199
You determine 1 unit as next bet and lose.
198
Now D'alembert is 1+1 = 2 as next bet AND you are -2 units below = 2 as next bet.

Same amount, you use it.

===============

Of course, as with everything, you need to back up winners somewhat consistently for this to make a profit. But by the +1 rising only I like this one. Better than the cancellations or martingales which rise quite a lot more.

An even change selection I like to be along with the "Cheating D'alembert" is my DBL2 bet selection. Yes. It stands for "Decision Before Last 2"... but that 2 has a special meaning

Please feel free to ask questions about the Cheating D'alembert below.

Thanks for your time.
Victor

[cps10]

Nice explanation Victor. Would this work in choosing 6 streets? After all that is even-money.

[admin]

Certainly keith, any form of "even chance" can fit.



Cheating D'alembert and DBL2 is what I call a "beautiful grinder".
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1197590520

[cps10]

I will have to try those out. The problem I will have is recognizing the RRBB or BBRR. I see it alot in a long string, but don't see it very independently.

[admin]

Yo Keith, as usual, I like to go virtual if I see I'm taking a beating. There is a  b***hy sequence to DBL2, but all in all, you win on chops, on streaks and also on long concatenations of series of 2, good to my taste.

[cps10]

Thanks Victor! So basically, you are not looking for ANY RRBB or BBRR

So, would RBRRBRRRRRBBRBRRBB

work?

[admin]

Thanks Victor! So basically, you are not looking for ANY RRBB or BBRR

Two "pure" series of 2 = yes.

I don't care what is behind them, it can be a series of 1, or a record-breaking 30+.

If you want the raw set to make "pure" series of 2, it is:
BRRBB

RBBRR

Hope it helps  8-)

[cps10]

Okay, so that series that I demonstrated is what you would want to see?

[Toothpaste]

Hi. I used this system on blackjack about a year ago, and it worked good. made me 1000 units profit in few days. then i quit cuz of losing streak that ate almost whole profit.

[admin]

Hi Toothpaste!

Do you mean Regular D'alembert or the CHEATING version I posted above?

Thanks.

[Toothpaste]

The cheating version. It came up to me that in normal version odds are against you, and that at one point in progression you are in profit, so my conclusion was that its better to go down to 1st level and improve your chances of winning, because when u hit losing streak on 25 units bet, its not very nice watching ur bankroll go down.
In my experience, u shud have atleast bank to reach 50 units bet, but best shud be till lvl 100, which is bankroll of 5050 units, if i remember exactly.

P.S.: it was rng blackjack, forgot to mention. and i still thought it was good system

[Toothpaste]

-