Offer to anyone who claims they can win in the long run

[curious]

curious,

BTW, what exactly do you expect to achieve through this exersize?

To bankroll advantage play and make a profit.

[curious]

curious

Why do you have to actually be at a wheel when Dublin is a real wheel broadcast worldwide? (Don't go ballistic on me--just asking!  I know it's not your challenge.)

Sam

Oh gee, I don't know.  Perhaps I don't like the idea of handing a large bankroll to someone I don't know and hope that they are nice enough to give it back to me along with my share of the winnings.

[TwoCatSam]

curious, I'm serious!

Not being catty (ahem), but what if a bloke used his own money and deposited at Dublin?  If he could double his bankroll, would you believe he has a winning system?  Is there one person on this forum you think would NOT lie about it?  He could have access to the account and testify that no more money than the original was deposited, so if there is an increase it is due to money being won.  People will say it's easy to double your bankroll.  Yes, using # it is!  You just get some more and play until you win and then testify.  But if they put in $1,000 of their own money........

You see, if you're really wanting to test people it can be done. 

You'd really hand Spike $5,000 to play on?  What if Spike takes a hike?

TwoCatSam

[curious]

curious, I'm serious!

Not being catty (ahem), but what if a bloke used his own money and deposited at Dublin?  If he could double his bankroll, would you believe he has a winning system?  Is there one person on this forum you think would NOT lie about it?  He could have access to the account and testify that no more money than the original was deposited, so if there is an increase it is due to money being won.  People will say it's easy to double your bankroll.  Yes, using # it is!  You just get some more and play until you win and then testify.  But if they put in $1,000 of their own money........

You see, if you're really wanting to test people it can be done. 

This has nothing to do with my offer.  I am not "wanting to test people".  I want to bankroll advantage play and profit on the winnings, it is that simple.

You'd really hand Spike $5,000 to play on?  What if Spike takes a hike?
TwoCatSam

Where in the world did you get that idea?  I wouldn't give Spike 5 cents.  I wouldn't "hand" anyone any amount of money.  What I will do is meet someone at the casino of their choice (in the United States) and bankroll their play and split the winnings with them.  I thought this was pretty clear in my offer.  Not sure why everyone wants to throw in all this complication.

[curious]

  Is there one person on this forum you think would NOT lie about it? 

Obviously, or I would not have set up an offer that started with "several people in this forum have claimed to be long term winners".  Obviously I believe some of them or I wouldn't be wanting to bankroll their play.

As for Spike, because you seem to have a crush on him or something, I know him from another forum and I don't believe anything he says.  its that simple.

[bombus]

[quote author=curious link=topic=12102.msg77127#msg77127 date=1252528059

As for Spike, because you seem to have a crush on him or something, I know him from another forum and I don't believe anything he says.  its that simple.
[/quote]

Yes, I'm starting to think that Spike might even be Wendel (winwithmath).

Stranger things have happened...

[bombus]

@ curious,

One thing is for sure, any advantage player into the "long run" with consistent profits certainly doesn't need your $5000 bankroll, so it's a no brainer...  there will be no takers, sorry.

Mate, I don't even need your $5000... but good luck, and a gold star for you for trying.

[TwoCatSam]

Me?  A crush on Spike!  Well, there's a new one, for ya!  He calls me a scammer and a shill.  Well, in a 'round about way, he does. 

curious

Let me see if I got it?  You find someone who can win at will and you bankroll them.  You split the profits.  That's like saying to the guy with the goose laying golden eggs, "Hey, mate!  Let me bring you some Purina Golden Goose Mash and we'll split the eggs."

I, too, wish you good luck!

Sam

[Mr J]

"Yes, I'm starting to think that Spike might even be Wendel (winwithmath)." >>> This is a subject I have been curious about for YEARS. I'm usually quite good at connecting "certain pieces" and have been told so by a few. I think Spike IS someone else (or more than one) but I wont lose sleep over it. Maybe not WWM but maybe yes. I have it narrowed down but dont want to start a civil war. lol Narrowed down to 3 and one of them would floor everyone but HEY, I could be wrong.  Ken

[curious]

@ curious,

One thing is for sure, any advantage player into the "long run" with consistent profits certainly doesn't need your $5000 bankroll, so it's a no brainer...  there will be no takers, sorry.

Mate, I don't even need your $5000... but good luck, and a gold star for you for trying.

I never said the bankroll was $5,000.  Again, where did you get that idea?  I didn't say what the bankroll would be.   But, it would be much larger than $5,000.

[curious]

Me?  A crush on Spike!  Well, there's a new one, for ya!  He calls me a scammer and a shill.  Well, in a 'round about way, he does. 

curious

Let me see if I got it?  You find someone who can win at will and you bankroll them.  You split the profits.  That's like saying to the guy with the goose laying golden eggs, "Hey, mate!  Let me bring you some Purina Golden Goose Mash and we'll split the eggs."

I, too, wish you good luck!

Sam

No one can win "at will".  I'm assuming that someone who is a long term winner has a 1%-3% advantage.  With standard deviation this doesn't even equate to "winnings" until you get far enough into the long run. 

Since roulette is a game where one player can back another player's  play and the advantage player will be playing anyway, how does it hurt him to put more money behind his play?  That is just smart business.

[curious]

"Yes, I'm starting to think that Spike might even be Wendel (winwithmath)." >>> This is a subject I have been curious about for YEARS. I'm usually quite good at connecting "certain pieces" and have been told so by a few. I think Spike IS someone else (or more than one) but I wont lose sleep over it. Maybe not WWM but maybe yes. I have it narrowed down but dont want to start a civil war. lol Narrowed down to 3 and one of them would floor everyone but HEY, I could be wrong.  Ken

winwithmath?   That lunatic is on here?  ayyayyay

[curious]

-