Escape the Effects of the Long Term by Only Playing in the Short Term

[Spike]

Why do the sides "want" to become even?>>>

It doesn't 'want' anything. The nature of random is to seek balance, something it can never achieve.

[bombus]

Why do the sides "want" to become even?>>>

It doesn't 'want' anything. The nature of random is to seek balance, something it can never achieve.

I said this a while back in another thread.

Random is dischord or chaos seeking harmony or balance, and you said it was the other way around harmony seeking chaos.

Now it's back the way I said it.

I don't suppose it really matters which, but you keep moving the goal posts, Spike.

[Spike]

Wasn't me, I never use the word 'harmony'.

[TwoCatSam]

Guys

Suppose you are playing a system that relies on the following sector NOT to appear: 3, 26,0,32,15.  Let's say God has ordained that those numbers will hit like crazy at your casino on February 2, 2010 at 2 P.M.  Naturally, you do not know this.  How can you be sure you won't sit down on that date and time?

Those numbers ARE ordained to hit sometime at some casino like they were the only numbers on the wheel.  How do you know when?  You don't and that is why jumping in and jumping out will not work; you will---sooner or later---jump in at the worstest time.

This brings me back to my million wheel test.  You have a million and one wheels all exactly the same.  You spin one a million times and you spin a million once each.  Will your numbers be different?  How and why?  Would they not be the same distribution?

Now think about the original question.

Sam

[pins]

they would come out equally.say you had a wheel that the numbers did not move only the ball.  they would come out equally

[Spike]

Those numbers ARE ordained to hit sometime at some casino like they were the only numbers on the wheel.>>

I'm sorry, but thats not true. In random, nothing is ordained. Will they hit? Probably, but only because the math says they will.

[Mr Chips]

I haven't heard from rjeaton and I have to say it's a recurring theme from some members on this forum not to
reply to PM's and emails. Even if I can't help someone for whatever reason I still let them know.


Anyway I am assuming that 4Selecta, up to select spin 10 is proving very difficult to code and therefore it is
unlikely to be coded for the foreseeable future, unless I hear otherwise.

[TwoCatSam]

OK, then, may we say the zero is ordained to hit at some time today?  I really think it will!  If the zero can be ordained to hit, why not five numbers.  I used those five numbers because I once saw them almost fill a marquee.

Sam

[Bazeegar]

I haven't heard from rjeaton and I have to say it's a recurring theme from some members on this forum not to
reply to PM's and emails. Even if I can't help someone for whatever reason I still let them know.

I read on one of the forums that he had an accident and is in hospital (I do not know whether it's true)...Hope things are improving at his end.

[mistarlupo]

I noticed rjeaton1 has been very silent lately...

[TwoCatSam]

Someone answer me this:  Let's say your game plan is to simply avoid the zero in the short term.  Nothing else.  Would you bet three days in hell that the zero won't appear on the next spin.  One spin!  If that's not "short term" tell me what is!

Hit-and-run simply won't work as you will---sooner or later----hit an loose.  People at the Russian Roulette player's funeral know this!

Sam

[Bo0Merang]

Someone answer me this:  Let's say your game plan is to simply avoid the zero in the short term.  Nothing else.  Would you bet three days in hell that the zero won't appear on the next spin.  One spin!  If that's not "short term" tell me what is!

Hit-and-run simply won't work as you will---sooner or later----hit an lose.  People at the Russian Roulette player's funeral know this!

Sam

--- im sure that green a.....e will show up..what ever. only  excuse for that is...no..zero wheel  sorry mate i know im  cheeke))))))))

[TwoCatSam]

Bo0Merang

Which brings me to yet another question:  If the house has a 2.7% edge which keeps folks from winning, why can't they win at Bet Voyager where there is no house edge?  Trust me, the Martingale won't work there either!

Sam

[GogoCro]

Bet voyager has 10% on net winnings in "no house edge" games.

[Bo0Merang]

Bo0Merang

Which brings me to yet another question:  If the house has a 2.7% edge which keeps folks from winning, why can't they win at Bet Voyager where there is no house edge?  Trust me, the Martingale won't work there either!

Sam

Sam  look at  this at diferent point please if there is  no  zero  wheel  it  must be diference that one  missing pocket will bring diferent habiyng randomness i never  played  in there if is Rng  therefore  my interest  go  way  from  that i dont care anymore why i do need to  go  for loosing session with no  edge plus manipulate odds    the border where the random and software make game is gone specialy  at in  no  zero  wheel i just  checked  couple 100 numbers  at  random  org  without zero it is diferent for data  like that  you need may 200 000 numbers  and  got  it  thru  to  know what  is  goin  on  i know it sounds  crazy but  i do  not  have  real  deal  for this plus  whoo  know  how  they  set up random  generator or pecentage winnings i can  assure  you  that  this  not  wil be funny  if you  see why  they  make no  zero  wheel- im sure  they  make it  not for winnings not for winnings not for winnings not for winnings        it is the same story like mini roulette it can be seen  usefull but  just  for casino  unfortunatelly Sorry mate i  have strictly opinion about crooks  and  this not will  change    my  numbers  bank  call  it for self  explanation

[Bo0Merang]

-