Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Signum system EC B&R

Started by Mr Chips, October 24, 2009, 03:56:24 AM

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

bene126

1    R
29  B  -1
4    B   0  M-1
16  R  -1
35  B  -2  M-2
18  R  -3  M-1 -1
3    R  -2  M-2 -2
9    R  -1  M-3 -1
15  B  -2  M-2 -2
1    R  -3  M-3 -3


I played this for real money at casino in my betting account.I stoped it here.What you think it`s correct or no?

bene126

4      B
7      R    -1
12    R     0    M-1
27    R   +1
18    R   +2    000
17    B   +1    P+1
35    B   +2    P+2    +1
12    R   +1    P+3    +2
33    B      0    P+2   +1
20    B    +1    P+3     0
36    R      0    P+4    +1
36    R    +1    P+5    +2
6      B       0    P+6    +3
23    R     -1     P+5    +2
11    B     -2     P+6    +1
22    B     -1     P+5    +2
16    R     -2    P+6     +3
17    B     -3     P+5    +4
8      B     -2     P+4    +3
17    B     -1     P+3    +4
19    R     -2     P+4    +3
14    R     -1      P+5   +4

Mr Chips

Quote from: bene126 on November 08, 2009, 02:25:35 PM
1    R
29  B  -1
4    B   0  M-1
16  R  -1
35  B  -2  M-2
18  R  -3  M-1 -1
3    R  -2  M-2 -2
9    R  -1  M-3 -1
15  B  -2  M-2 -2
1    R  -3  M-3 -3


I played this for real money at casino in my betting account.I stoped it here.What you think it`s correct or no?

I have said on the website do not play this complex system for real at a casino until you have practiced
many, many sessions.

The above is correct so far and is likely to be a C session the most difficult to handle and therefore requires a
a number practice sessions.

I do not recommend playing this system at a  casino until you are proficient in it's use.

Richard

Nherisson

Hi Richard,

good to see you here again with your new complex system  :laugh: But so great!

I think I understand most of the system but the most complicated thing is how to bet I think. I undersood the example in your website but I need more examples with an explanation bet by bet. So if someone can explain step by step how to bet, it would be nice not only for me but also for those who want to get the system.

Thanks all

bene126

Quote from: Mr Chips on November 08, 2009, 04:38:28 PM
I have said on the website do not play this complex system for real at a casino until you have practiced
many, many sessions.

The above is correct so far and is likely to be a C session the most difficult to handle and therefore requires a
a number practice sessions.

I do not recommend playing this system at a  casino until you are proficient in it's use.

Richard

Yes i know what you said..I lost only 3 units and i will be play again.I am only want if was be correct because i understnad this system now.

Natural9

Quote from: bene126 on November 08, 2009, 02:25:35 PM
1    R
29  B  -1
4    B   0  M-1
16  R  -1
35  B  -2  M-2
18  R  -3  M-1 -1
3    R  -2  M-2 -2
9    R  -1  M-3 -1
15  B  -2  M-2 -2
1    R  -3  M-3 -3


I played this for real money at casino in my betting account.I stoped it here.What you think it`s correct or no?
Bene you need post the rem aining  numbers I not sure if this session should be abandoned

Mr Chips

Quote from: Only1Word on November 08, 2009, 12:54:22 PM


Wiesbaden  4/8/06  Tb3

Row   #    BorR     +/-/0    PorM   Unit +/-
1      34     R
2      32     R          +1
3       8      B            0        M-1
4       8      B          +1
5      18     R            0        000
6      23     R          +1        P+1
7       6      B            0        P+2       +1
8      26     B          +1        P+3       +2
9      34     R            0        P+4       +3
10     18     R          +1        P+5       +4
11     11     B            0        P+6       +5
12     36     R           -1        P+5       +4
13     27     R            0        P+4       +5
14     30     R          +1        P+3       +6
15      5      R          +2        P+2       +7
16     18     R          +3        P+3       +6
17      7      R          +4        P+4       +7
18      4      B          +3        P+3       +6    ch
19     12     R          +2        P+2       +7    ch
20     36     R          +3        P+3       +6

Hi Nherisson,

So 4Selecta is not enough for you ;D

I will use the session produce by Only1Word.

In row 6 column 4 there is +1 and in column 5  P+1. The expectation is that, as P is new
it will increase to +2, therefore in order for that to happen there has to be duplication, as
then P will be in ascent. At row 4 there is +1, 0, so we want a repeat +1 0.

In row 7 in order to achieve a 0 in column 4 the bet has to be on Black and this was the
correct decision.

Signum will often identify the correct colour in quite a complex colour series and for this
reason it has to make a profit in the long term.

Regards

Richard

To Everyone,

I have said on the website that if Signum is thoroughly understood it can make
roulette into a skilled game, but unless effort is made to fully understand the system
then it will be useless and remains a game of chance.


Nherisson

Ok Mr Chips, thanks!

But can you tell me general rules to explain how to bet? or more examples because it's quite unclear for me for the moment...

For example, what would be the bets for this session:

20      
13   +1   
  2   +2   P+1
19   +1   0O0
  1   +2   P+1
19   +3   0O0
  1   +4   P+1
30   +5   P+2
  7   +6   P+3
22   +5   P+2
  9   +4   P+1
  7   +5   P+2
11   +4   P+3
17   +5   P+4
25   +4   P+5
26   +3   P+4
18   +2   P+3
18   +3   P+4
27   +4   P+3
32   +5   P+2


Many thanks


Nherisson

droidman

Hi Richard!

I know these are generalizations, but are they correct?

after the 1st zero, don't make a P or M symbol
after any 000 make a P or M symbol, but don't bet
after 1st +/- number, make a P or M symbol
after 3rd P or M symbol (except 000), make 1st bet

Thanks
droidman

Mr Chips

Quote from: Nherisson on November 09, 2009, 05:54:12 PM
Ok Mr Chips, thanks!

But can you tell me general rules to explain how to bet? or more examples because it's quite unclear for me for the moment...

For example, what would be the bets for this session:

20      
13   +1   
  2   +2   P+1
19   +1   0O0
  1   +2   P+1
19   +3   0O0
  1   +4   P+1
30   +5   P+2
  7   +6   P+3
22   +5   P+2
  9   +4   P+1
  7   +5   P+2
11   +4   P+3
17   +5   P+4
25   +4   P+5
26   +3   P+4
18   +2   P+3
18   +3   P+4
27   +4   P+3
32   +5   P+2


Many thanks


Nherisson


[table=,]
Row,#,B or R,+/-/0,P or M,Units
1,20,B,,,
2,13,B,+1,,
3,2,B,+2,P+1,
4,19,R,+1,OOO,
5,1,R,+2,P+1,
6,19,R*,+3,OOO,+1
7,1,R,+4,P+1,
8,30,R,+5,P+2,0
9,7,R*,+6,P+3,+1
10,22,B,+5,P+2,0
11,9,R*,+4,P+1,+1,check
12,7,R*,+5,P+2,+2
13,11,B*,+4,P+3,+3
14,17,B*,+5,P+4,+4
15,25,R*,+4,P+5,+5
16,26,B,+3,P+4,+4
17,18,R*,+2,P+3,+5
18,18,R,+3,P+4,+4,check
[/table]
* correct bets

P ended in row 4 and in row 5 a new P+1 emerged. The expectation is for this also to end
and therefore to achieve that result in row 6 column 3 you would want a Red to come in,
which would increase column 4 to +3 and so end P, as there would be no duplication.

In row 8 the bet on B was incorrect, as P did not end as happened previously, so the
expectation is for P to ascend in row 9. You would want an increase from +5 to +6 and
therefore the bet would be on another Red coming in.

In row 10 P is in decline showing P+2, the expectation is for this to continue to P+1.
You would not want duplication, +5,+6,+5,+6, as this would result in a P+3 and the
B+5 in row 10 would increase to B+6 in row 11. The bet has to be on Red for P to decline
to P+1 in row 11.

Row 12 is tricky, as a decision has to be made as to whether P will end here or not. There
are the previous results, where P has ended and if this was to end at row 12, then this
session is likely to be a D Formation. If the P ascent had reached say +5 instead of +3,
I would have expected P to end, but as the ascent was short, I am inclined to favour a
continuance of P. If this was shown to be incorrect, then that would be further evidence
of a D Formation and future decisions would be guided by this assumption.

Hopefully you will be able to understand how the rest of the B or R are selected.

I would have ended the session at row 18 where there is a check at +4. A +5 has appeared
twice, and the gamble was that row 18 would produce a +6 and as this did not happen I
would be content with a +4 profit.

Regards

Richard

Mr Chips

Quote from: droidman on November 10, 2009, 01:23:55 AM
Hi Richard!

I know these are generalizations, but are they correct?

after the 1st zero, don't make a P or M symbol
after any 000 make a P or M symbol, but don't bet
after 1st +/- number, make a P or M symbol
after 3rd P or M symbol (except 000), make 1st bet

Thanks
droidman


Hi droidman,

At first I misunderstood 'after the first zero' and have corrected it. What you mean is in the +/-/0
column after the first zero it is not possible to make a P or M. True.

The next two appear to be correct.

There is a problem with your last generalisation.

There are the following :

P+1
OOO
P+1
OOO +1


M-1
M-2
M-3 +1

P+1
000
P+1
P+2 -1

Regards

Richard


Only1Word

Thanks, Your reasoning for your decision at row 12 in the previous example clears things up.  After practicing a few sessions, i have come across those situations a few times now and at times it was difficult to decide which way to go.

I do have a question though. .
If we came to a tricky situation where a case could be made to bet either way, then could it be plausible just to not bet next and see which way the symbol goes, and then continue after?

Mr Chips

Quote from: Only1Word on November 10, 2009, 07:51:39 AM
Thanks, Your reasoning for your decision at row 12 in the previous example clears things up.  After practicing a few sessions, I have come across those situations a few times now and at times it was difficult to decide which way to go.

I do have a question though. .
If we came to a tricky situation where a case could be made to bet either way, then could it be plausible just to not bet next and see which way the symbol goes, and then continue after?

Yes of course you can always not bet. When your at a Table at the casino and you happen to have noted
a number of Lower group numbers, which will mean continuous spins, it may make sense to take a break
from betting especially if it's on a check line.

As your getting more experienced playing through various sessions and you come across a tricky situation
try and get some information from the session. What I mean by that is for example if your at entry 12 and
there has been no increase above P+3 and it has developed into a C session, always expect it to decline
to P+2. Also take account of any patterns in B & R, there are occasions when they can be useful in confirming
an expectation. You will even find a pattern in the units sometimes helps, which seems at first ridiculous, but
I have been helped out this way in a difficult C session and made a good profit.

The unlikeliest  piece of info could well help in the most difficult session and such experience will increase the
profitability of many sessions.

Regards

Richard

Only1Word

Continuing on from your last post. .  about using other trends other than the symbols to decide which way to go when a  possible tricky decision has to be made.

This came up in a session from Wiesbaden 7/8/06. .

Row   #    BorR    +/-/0    PorM      Unit+/-
1       8       B
2      30      R        -1
3      36      R         0         M-1
4      17      B        -1
5      11      B         0         000
6      35      B       +1         M-1
7       4       B       +2         000        +1
8      16      R       +1         M-1
9      21      R       +2         000        +2
10      9       R       +3         M-1
11     18      R       +4         000        +3
12     24      B       +3         M-1
13     35      B       +4         000        +4
14     21      R       +3         P+1
15     14      R       +4         P+2        +3
16     20      B       +3         P+3        +4
17     18      R       +2         P+2        +3 ch

The session started off well with a strong D formation up until row 15. 
Previously the symbol collapsed straight away. .  This time a symbol has reached 2 for the first time, so do i expect it to collapse or continue to increase?

The reason i went for the increase is because i noticed a recent good trend happening in column4.  From row 10 to 15 column4 has gone +3,+4,+3,+4,+3,+4, so on the basis of this i opted for the P to increase expecting the run to continue in column4, which proved to be correct.

For the next bet it was straight forward enough with the  P symbol on the increase, and a stong trend in column4, black was the obvious selection, but unfortunatly it was a losing bet,, and decided to end here with the 3rd +3 units in the final column.

How was this session played Mr Chips. .  Anygood? or no?


bene126

Quote from: Only1Word on November 10, 2009, 04:45:30 PM
Continuing on from your last post. .  about using other trends other than the symbols to decide which way to go when a  possible tricky decision has to be made.

This came up in a session from Wiesbaden 7/8/06. .

Row   #    BorR    +/-/0    PorM      Unit+/-
1       8       B
2      30      R        -1
3      36      R         0         M-1
4      17      B        -1
5      11      B         0         000
6      35      B       +1         M-1
7       4       B       +2         000        +1
8      16      R       +1         M-1
9      21      R       +2         000        +2
10      9       R       +3         M-1
11     18      R       +4         000        +3
12     24      B       +3         M-1
13     35      B       +4         000        +4
14     21      R       +3         P+1
15     14      R       +4         P+2        +3
16     20      B       +3         P+3        +4
17     18      R       +2         P+2        +3 ch

The session started off well with a strong D formation up until row 15. 
Previously the symbol collapsed straight away. .  This time a symbol has reached 2 for the first time, so do I expect it to collapse or continue to increase?

The reason I went for the increase is because I noticed a recent good trend happening in column4.  From row 10 to 15 column4 has gone +3,+4,+3,+4,+3,+4, so on the basis of this I opted for the P to increase expecting the run to continue in column4, which proved to be correct.

For the next bet it was straight forward enough with the  P symbol on the increase, and a stong trend in column4, black was the obvious selection, but unfortunatly it was a losing bet,, and decided to end here with the 3rd +3 units in the final column.

How was this session played Mr Chips. .  Anygood? or no?



Hi onlyworld.I think this session is good.This numbers are from live roulette or RNG.Because when i play on RNG most sessions are C and E formation.I think on RNG can be use this system but on live roulette is the best.

bene126

-