Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Signum system EC B&R

Started by Mr Chips, October 24, 2009, 03:56:24 AM

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

bene126

Hi Richard.Can you give me some numbers?I will try it.


regards
Thomas

Mr Chips

Quote from: beo on November 11, 2009, 04:04:40 PM
Hi all!

I've made a little tracker.
It can download Wiesbaden Spins, select spins, and fill the 4th column => you just have to fill the P/M column.
The only bug I found is when we have two consecutive "0" in selected spins.
Please repport bugs, . . .
Modifications are welcome.

Hope you'll enjoy it ;-)

I have sent you a PM

Richard

Lohnro

Hey Mr Chips,

Just a quick question mate.

In you sample sessions on you website, Session A3. In row 4 you have M-2, aren't we suppose to leave it blank because the result before was 0?

Mr Chips

Quote from: Lohnro on November 11, 2009, 10:01:03 PM
Hey Mr Chips,

Just a quick question mate.

In you sample sessions on you website, Session A3. In row 4 you have M-2, aren't we suppose to leave it blank because the result before was 0?

I was wondering when you were going to find it :biggrin:

Joking aside thanks for pointing it out, I will amend it today. I am gradually eliminating the errors :good:

droidman

I guess I need more practice!

Wiesbaden, 1-17-07  t.4

1   20    b
2   1      r    -1
3   7      r     0    m-1
4   27    r    +1
5   23    r    +2    000
6   17    b    +1    m-1
7   19    r      0    m-2   -1
8   26    b    -1    m-1   -2
9   32    r    -2    000   -3
10  24   b    -3    p+1
11  17   b    -2    000   -4
12  21   r    -3     p+1
13  3     r    -2     p+2   -5
14  3     r    -1     p+1   -6
15  9     r     0     p+2   -7
16  9     r    +1    p+3   -8
17  20   b     0     p+2   -9
18  33   b    +1    p+3   -8
19  20   b    +2    p+2   -7
20  2     b    +3    p+3   -6
21  2     b    +4    p+4   -7
22  19   r    +3    p+3   -6  ch
23  25   r    +4    p+4   -5
24  35   b    +3    p+5   -6
25  3     r    +2    p+4   -5  ch
26  21   r    +3    p+3


Question: if black had shown on row 26, would that
have made P+5?

Thanks
droidman

Mr Chips

Quote from: droidman on November 12, 2009, 12:36:23 PM
I guess I need more practice!

Wiesbaden, 1-17-07  t.4

1   20    b
2   1      r    -1
3   7      r     0    m-1
4   27    r    +1
5   23    r    +2    000
6   17    b    +1    m-1
7   19    r      0    m-2   -1
8   26    b    -1    m-1   -2
9   32    r    -2    000   -3
10  24   b    -3    p+1
11  17   b    -2    000   -4
12  21   r    -3     p+1
13  3     r    -2     p+2   -5
14  3     r    -1     p+1   -6
15  9     r     0     p+2   -7
16  9     r    +1    p+3   -8
17  20   b     0     p+2   -9
18  33   b    +1    p+3   -8
19  20   b    +2    p+2   -7
20  2     b    +3    p+3   -6
21  2     b    +4    p+4   -7
22  19   r    +3    p+3   -6  ch
23  25   r    +4    p+4   -5
24  35   b    +3    p+5   -6
25  3     r    +2    p+4   -5  ch
26  21   r    +3    p+3


Question: if black had shown on row 26, would that
have made P+5?

Thanks
droidman


I nearly choked on my cup of tea when I saw -9 :o :swoon:

Can I ask, do you always use lower case? Just so used to upper case, easy on the eyes.

Unfortunately the session is wrong, but you are still a learner so no problem.

Please check row 8 col 5. This is quite a difficult C session and of course I will help you further,
but try first of all to think about the patterns that are associated with a C Formation.

bene126

Hi Richard.This is my session for real money with minimum stake 0.003 euro cents .Is it correct?


B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6


Only1Word

Quote from: bene126 on November 12, 2009, 03:27:00 PM
B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6



This is all correct until the final row. There is a +4 in the second last row. The previous +4 in that column resulted in a +3. As the symbol is M in the second last row, it doesnt want a repeat of that, for M to increase.
Red comes in the final row making the second column +5, which isnt a repeat so M increases to M-2.

MAX

Only1Word

B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  P+2 +1( ok I see I made a mistake from here :-[) it must be ooo


Thanks
MAX

droidman

Hi Richard,

Thanks for being patient with us learners.

I was studying the patterns in C formations, and I noticed
in session C2 a blank in row 11 where a P/M symbol might be.
Maybe there's a reason for it, or another error.

And, in the future I'll use caps to save you from eyestrain!

droidman


bene126

Quote from: Only1Word on November 12, 2009, 03:56:16 PM
This is all correct until the final row. There is a +4 in the second last row. The previous +4 in that column resulted in a +3. As the symbol is M in the second last row, it doesn't want a repeat of that, for M to increase.
Red comes in the final row making the second column +5, which isnt a repeat so M increases to M-2.


Oh.Yes you are right...i must bad see...yes i know we must assume +3...so ok i am happy that i understand it...

Mr Chips

Quote from: droidman on November 12, 2009, 04:08:07 PM
Hi Richard,

Thanks for being patient with us learners.

I was studying the patterns in C formations, and I noticed
in session C2 a blank in row 11 where a P/M symbol might be.
Maybe there's a reason for it, or another error.

And, in the future I'll use caps to save you from eyestrain!

droidman

Hi droidman,

Unfortunately it's an error, sorry if it mislead you. It's no excuse, but the other version of this system
treats the -1, 0 differently. The website will eventually be 100% accurate and thanks for pointing it
out. I will correct it soon.

If you are not able to make any headway with the 1-17-07 session, I will provide you with some
explanations.

Regards

Richard


droidman

1-17-07 session:

1   20    B  
2   1      R   -1
3   7      R    0    M-1
4   27    R   +1
5   23    R   +2   000
6   17    B   +1   M-1
7   19    R    0    M-2   -1
8   26    B   -1    M-3    0
9   32    R   -2    M-4   +1
10  24   B   -3    M-3    0
11  17   B   -2    M-4   -1
12  21   R   -3    M-3    0   ch
13  3     R   -2    M-2   -1   ch
14  3     R   -1    M-3   -2
15  9     R    0    M-4   -3
16  9     R   +1   M-5   -2
17  20   B    0    M-6   -1   ch
18  33   B   +1   M-5   -2   ch
19  20   B   +2   M-6   -1
20  2     B   +3   M-7   -2

Does this look a little better?
Please tell me if I made a mistake somewhere.
droidman

Werdna

Hi Richard,

I feel the need to ask you a question before I read through the link to your system and the post's from these good people and that question is why does your system win?

You see it's not that I am lazy, it's just that I haven't actually come across a system which beats the numbers on this wonderful puzzle which we call Roulette within this forum!?

I believe your answer would give more incentive for people to look at your system than incentive would give for the people to look at your system. If you get my meaning, which I'm sure you do.

Looking forward to your help,

Kind regards

Werdna

Mr Chips

Quote from: bene126 on November 12, 2009, 03:27:00 PM
Hi Richard.This is my session for real money with minimum stake 0.003 euro cents .Is it correct?


B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6



A good session and thanks to Only1Word for the correction.

As the bets are so cheap, yes it makes for good practice sessions. If you get any really difficult sessions
then post them here and we can examine it.

Mr Chips

-