Signum system EC B&R

[bene126]

Hi Richard.Can you give me some numbers?I will try it.


regards
Thomas

[Mr Chips]

Hi all!

I've made a little tracker.
It can download Wiesbaden Spins, select spins, and fill the 4th column => you just have to fill the P/M column.
The only bug I found is when we have two consecutive "0" in selected spins.
Please repport bugs, . . .
Modifications are welcome.

Hope you'll enjoy it ;-)

I have sent you a PM

Richard

[Lohnro]

Hey Mr Chips,

Just a quick question mate.

In you sample sessions on you website, Session A3. In row 4 you have M-2, aren't we suppose to leave it blank because the result before was 0?

[Mr Chips]

Hey Mr Chips,

Just a quick question mate.

In you sample sessions on you website, Session A3. In row 4 you have M-2, aren't we suppose to leave it blank because the result before was 0?

I was wondering when you were going to find it

Joking aside thanks for pointing it out, I will amend it today. I am gradually eliminating the errors

[droidman]

I guess I need more practice!

Wiesbaden, 1-17-07  t.4

1   20    b
2   1      r    -1
3   7      r     0    m-1
4   27    r    +1
5   23    r    +2    000
6   17    b    +1    m-1
7   19    r      0    m-2   -1
8   26    b    -1    m-1   -2
9   32    r    -2    000   -3
10  24   b    -3    p+1
11  17   b    -2    000   -4
12  21   r    -3     p+1
13  3     r    -2     p+2   -5
14  3     r    -1     p+1   -6
15  9     r     0     p+2   -7
16  9     r    +1    p+3   -8
17  20   b     0     p+2   -9
18  33   b    +1    p+3   -8
19  20   b    +2    p+2   -7
20  2     b    +3    p+3   -6
21  2     b    +4    p+4   -7
22  19   r    +3    p+3   -6  ch
23  25   r    +4    p+4   -5
24  35   b    +3    p+5   -6
25  3     r    +2    p+4   -5  ch
26  21   r    +3    p+3


Question: if black had shown on row 26, would that
have made P+5?

Thanks
droidman

[Mr Chips]

I guess I need more practice!

Wiesbaden, 1-17-07  t.4

1   20    b
2   1      r    -1
3   7      r     0    m-1
4   27    r    +1
5   23    r    +2    000
6   17    b    +1    m-1
7   19    r      0    m-2   -1
8   26    b    -1    m-1   -2
9   32    r    -2    000   -3
10  24   b    -3    p+1
11  17   b    -2    000   -4
12  21   r    -3     p+1
13  3     r    -2     p+2   -5
14  3     r    -1     p+1   -6
15  9     r     0     p+2   -7
16  9     r    +1    p+3   -8
17  20   b     0     p+2   -9
18  33   b    +1    p+3   -8
19  20   b    +2    p+2   -7
20  2     b    +3    p+3   -6
21  2     b    +4    p+4   -7
22  19   r    +3    p+3   -6  ch
23  25   r    +4    p+4   -5
24  35   b    +3    p+5   -6
25  3     r    +2    p+4   -5  ch
26  21   r    +3    p+3


Question: if black had shown on row 26, would that
have made P+5?

Thanks
droidman

I nearly choked on my cup of tea when I saw -9

Can I ask, do you always use lower case? Just so used to upper case, easy on the eyes.

Unfortunately the session is wrong, but you are still a learner so no problem.

Please check row 8 col 5. This is quite a difficult C session and of course I will help you further,
but try first of all to think about the patterns that are associated with a C Formation.

[bene126]

Hi Richard.This is my session for real money with minimum stake 0.003 euro cents .Is it correct?


B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6

[Only1Word]

B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6

This is all correct until the final row. There is a +4 in the second last row. The previous +4 in that column resulted in a +3. As the symbol is M in the second last row, it doesnt want a repeat of that, for M to increase.
Red comes in the final row making the second column +5, which isnt a repeat so M increases to M-2.

[MAX]

Only1Word

B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  P+2 +1( ok I see I made a mistake from here ) it must be ooo


Thanks
MAX

[droidman]

Hi Richard,

Thanks for being patient with us learners.

I was studying the patterns in C formations, and I noticed
in session C2 a blank in row 11 where a P/M symbol might be.
Maybe there's a reason for it, or another error.

And, in the future I'll use caps to save you from eyestrain!

droidman

[bene126]

This is all correct until the final row. There is a +4 in the second last row. The previous +4 in that column resulted in a +3. As the symbol is M in the second last row, it doesn't want a repeat of that, for M to increase.
Red comes in the final row making the second column +5, which isnt a repeat so M increases to M-2.

Oh.Yes you are right...i must bad see...yes i know we must assume +3...so ok i am happy that i understand it...

[Mr Chips]

Hi Richard,

Thanks for being patient with us learners.

I was studying the patterns in C formations, and I noticed
in session C2 a blank in row 11 where a P/M symbol might be.
Maybe there's a reason for it, or another error.

And, in the future I'll use caps to save you from eyestrain!

droidman

Hi droidman,

Unfortunately it's an error, sorry if it mislead you. It's no excuse, but the other version of this system
treats the -1, 0 differently. The website will eventually be 100% accurate and thanks for pointing it
out. I will correct it soon.

If you are not able to make any headway with the 1-17-07 session, I will provide you with some
explanations.

Regards

Richard

[droidman]

1-17-07 session:

1   20    B  
2   1      R   -1
3   7      R    0    M-1
4   27    R   +1
5   23    R   +2   000
6   17    B   +1   M-1
7   19    R    0    M-2   -1
8   26    B   -1    M-3    0
9   32    R   -2    M-4   +1
10  24   B   -3    M-3    0
11  17   B   -2    M-4   -1
12  21   R   -3    M-3    0   ch
13  3     R   -2    M-2   -1   ch
14  3     R   -1    M-3   -2
15  9     R    0    M-4   -3
16  9     R   +1   M-5   -2
17  20   B    0    M-6   -1   ch
18  33   B   +1   M-5   -2   ch
19  20   B   +2   M-6   -1
20  2     B   +3   M-7   -2

Does this look a little better?
Please tell me if I made a mistake somewhere.
droidman

[Werdna]

Hi Richard,

I feel the need to ask you a question before I read through the link to your system and the post's from these good people and that question is why does your system win?

You see it's not that I am lazy, it's just that I haven't actually come across a system which beats the numbers on this wonderful puzzle which we call Roulette within this forum!?

I believe your answer would give more incentive for people to look at your system than incentive would give for the people to look at your system. If you get my meaning, which I'm sure you do.

Looking forward to your help,

Kind regards

Werdna

[Mr Chips]

Hi Richard.This is my session for real money with minimum stake 0.003 euro cents .Is it correct?


B
B  +1
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +1
R  +4  P+1
B  +3  000  +2
R  +2  M-1
R  +3  000  +3
B  +2  P+1
R  +1  000  +4
R  +2  P+1
R  +3  000  +5
R  +4  M-1
R  +5  000  +6

A good session and thanks to Only1Word for the correction.

As the bets are so cheap, yes it makes for good practice sessions. If you get any really difficult sessions
then post them here and we can examine it.

[Mr Chips]

-