Luck, logic, and white lies.

[lucky_strike]

Gambling Abstracts.
Statistics.

LS

[lucky_strike]

The following is statistical measurements and observations.

I wont make any reply or answer any questions to does who can't prove the opposite with statistical measurements.
Any argument or opinion that does not show the opposite using the same math, probability and statistics will i regard as useless and not valid.

There will be only one conclusion from this attempt and i will only make one statement based upon what i will show you.

LS

[lucky_strike]

Here you can read about Gamblers Fallacy.
nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

Now all the numbers i use with this simulations are from random.org and are based upon noise.
nolinks.random.org

This is no attempt to provide you with an roulette system or any kind of method.
This is observations.

I will give you an meaning about what the words below is all about regarding my observations.

Imbalance
Balance
Correction

Future state
Present state
Past state

Certain events can get stronger or weaker or hovering and we will observe this.

LS

[lucky_strike]

I find the comparison using the words like clouds and rain drops very amusing.

So you can observe every series that appears as an cloud and every singles event that appears as an rain drop.

Now if we have many clouds and one rain drop appears it eliminate one state from appear.
But it still remain that there is an 50/50 situation as there is two state left that can appear.

This is the first observation I would like to talk about.

Later we will observe if two state of appearance will be an part of correction - if it exist - as nothing is due to happen.

State of apperance.
Stronger.
Weaker.
Hovering.

LS

[Marven]

Hi LS

Good stuff.

By the way, what happened to your SD correction method which you were testing and promised to post statistical results? (I bumped that thread as I think it's related to this : nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/this-is-how-any-serios-attempt-beat-an-random-game-the-challange-at-gg/msg85916/#msg85916)

[lucky_strike]

I like to observe when the std grows and to see if there is any thing that has an significant change to it.

The significant change is an tricky thing as we have been told there is no limits.

Its tricky because it should not be any underlying force from the past state that will effect the future state.
That there exist some kind of connection of some kind.

As in any combination it can grow, get weaker or hovering at all times.
If this is the truth the the only thing that would matter is the present state that we can observe.

As i want this observation to apply to real conditions regarding observation in an casino the scenario is this.

The imbalance has to occur with in the first 100 trails and we observe the following 200 trails to see if there is any significant change.

Yes i understand that some of you find this useless as we could get series to chop for 300 trails.
The only thing i have to say about that is that it does not matter as there would be no attempt playing with or against it.

That makes me go a little further with this and mention that after we are done with the state it find it self with we are going to talk about the following.

The end of an state.
The present state as an true or false indication.
The future state as an observation.

It will be about if there is an existence of indications and tendency towards an future state.

LS

[lucky_strike]

-