It is progresson or flat betting ?

[aegil]

Let's say i have a system who use progression on numbers : I double up my bet each time i loose two in raw.  I play each of session of 36 spins.  Each session will end between a max loss of -100 unit and a max win of + 100 Unit.  No doubt the system in itself use progression.

But after some days of playing, let's say i now have played like 500 sessions (all between -100 and +100 so, with result being positif)

If we take all session together, and always keep the same unit /stop loss / stop win, can we consider that play is like a flat betting ? (Stat of winning are like expected : 50% on even chance, 33% on dozen. . . ).

[mistarlupo]

Yes, it is flat betting.

Welcome on board!

[TwoCatSam]

Geez, it's weird how close he got to me on this!

This is exactly what I'm doing with my November/December test!

Some say a million is not enough; some say 100 is too many.

ageil........what does your dispersion look like?  Therein lies the key.

Sam

[aegil]

I not really sure how to measure dispersion.  I have search on these board and think its (number of cycle without a win in a cycle).

I use a 33% winning / 66% losing bet selection.  I consider a cycle is 3 outcome, and so i think a dispersion is LLL.  I have record all the spin of 90 session, so after track it :

On 528 possible cycle, 134 was dispersion (25. 4%).
If i take deviation every ten session, its very constant (16 dispersion cycle on 64. . .  19/60, 18/64, 17/72, 20/65, 20/67, 11/67, 13/69).  This is on 1502 placed spins.

But maybe i'm wrong and dispersion can't measure by this way, i don't know. 

[TwoCatSam]

To me, dispersion is the predictability of your wins.  Say in a hundred trots, you never lost more than three in a row.  That would be a very low dispersion.

Sam

[VLSroulette]

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_dispersion

There is positive dispersion, but we refer to it as concentration.

[VLSroulette]

-