Some promissing system

[Nathan Detroit]

If anyone  wants to play the following  AFTER   4 REDS  bet  Black that`s  the  bettors prerogative. It`s  his money at stake.

Therefore  someone acting like a smart alek and calling it a  gamblers  fallcay is  just like a PARROT repeating an old cliche.

The calculated odds  that RED would appear at the  5th bet are 31 :1. Good  enough for me to  go on BLACK !( With a certain  method)

But nothing is ever certain  and that is  a fact but not a fallacy.


Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS.......... YOUR WAY.

[iggiv]

Danger Man, i was talking to some experienced gambler with lots of knowledge and he told me that u r absolutely right. No point to argue with "math guys" he told me. When we bet he said "we are not trying to change the odds, but we try to to catch or "tune-up" into the game rythm".

[Noble Savage]

but we try to to catch or "tune-up" into the game rythm

And what is that exactly? Is it deterministic?

Not it's not. 

Sure the random process produces "cycles".   It's easy to see.   But there is no way, method, or algorithm that can predict a cycle's length (I.  e.   how long it will last and when it will break). 

The calculated odds  that RED would appear at the  5th bet are 31 :1.   Good  enough for me to  go on BLACK !

The odds that you'd see a series of 5 reds are 1 of 32. 

More specifically, 5 Reds in a row is one of 32 equally likely 5 spin combinations. 

16 of these possible combinations end with a Red, and the other 16 end with a black. 

Therefore the odds that a Red would appear after 4 blacks are always 50% (minus house edge). 

The same applies for combinations with different lengths (e.  g.   6 spins, 7 spins, 30 spins, etc.  ).   No matter what happened in x number of past spins, the odds for an even chance bet winning are always 50% - house edge. 

Period. 

Don't let system sellers and gambling forums posters fool you guys.   This whole "bet selection on random events" thing is an illusion motivated by the desire to win money.   You are better off focusing on other things.   

[MATTJONO]

Danger Man, I was talking to some experienced gambler with lots of knowledge and he told me that u r absolutely right. No point to argue with "math guys" he told me. When we bet he said "we are not trying to change the odds, but we try to to catch or "tune-up" into the game rythm".

''to catch or "tune-up" into the game rythm".    easier said that done but i totally agree...

question= doesn't random/maths (roulette) naturally produce patterns....its full of patterns waves to jump on its just having the experience in when to jump in and jump out with more more chips in your pocket...........but like iv said before its easier said than done.

mattjono

[iggiv]

''to catch or "tune-up" into the game rythm".    easier said that done but I totally agree...

question= doesn't random/maths (roulette) naturally produce patterns....its full of patterns waves to jump on its just having the experience in when to jump in and jump out with more more chips in your pocket...........but like iv said before its easier said than done.

mattjono

yes Matt buddy, it is very hard. otherwise everybody would beat roulette and casinos would not operate. But if
we had a wheel with "straight" numbers, i  think it would not be that hard. that's the reason they mixed up the numbers. Imagine u could put one unit on a hot sector of 12 and work out a long progression. Mr J would probably  buy not just one reastaurant, but  a big net of a restaurants 

[iggiv]

-