beting 24 numbers........

[macduff]

hi there, have posted a few times in here and love all the suggestions on systems.
i would like to ask if anyone could help with stop loss on betting on 24 numbers at the third part of progression.
is it possible to recoupe or take a loss on the third bet that would not completely wipe out all bets that have gone before.
i do realise that it is not possible to recoupe all previous bets,but what could be the best loss(if you know what i mean)betting 1,3,9 and having the stop loss on 9.
system is based on 24 numbers on 37 spins and losses are expected,but the amount of wins out weigh losses so a stop loss would allow me to make a fortune and spend the rest of my life on a golf course(well apart from 2 hours a day).
i would appreciate any help, the progression has only went to step 4 once in 20 sessions.   

[Proofreaders2000]

How about a progression 1,2,1,2 (continuously)  Reason: the first number would be the profit and the 2nd leg of the progression would bring your bankroll back to your original balance. (recovery bet)

[macduff]

How about a progression 1,2,1,2 (continuously)  Reason: the first number would be the profit and the 2nd leg of the progression would bring your bankroll back to your original balance. (recovery bet)

thanks for the reply proof,the problem is that most wins are 1st or 2nd bet so i want to maximise wins,but would be willing to take a loss on 3rd as this could go to 4 or 5 losses in a row.
i would like to bet on 3rd bet,but progression is to steep.hence the reason for stop/loss.
     

[macduff]

that was another session,waiting for 13 unique numbers. bet on all other 24 numbers for a total of 36 to 37 spins.
15 wins and 5 losses,only once did it go to a win on 3rd bet.
if using base bet of 1 unit then its a profit of 180.
so a stop loss on 3rd bet would lessen profits but not eat bank role as it is possible that losses could run and run.
to play 3rd bet would cost 312, i would rather be conservative and take a hit on 3rd bet but also recoupe.
is this posssible,as maths was never my strong point and i can only see heavy losses with my sums. 

[Rheti]

Why not doing James Bond...lol

                  
   first 18   18   200   400   -380   20
   last 12   12   140   420   -380   40
   street   3   40   480   -380   100
                  
      33   380         
      37            
      89%            
                  
                  
                  
   first   18   3600   7200   -6960   240
   last   12   2380   7140   -6960   180
   street   3   600   7200   -6960   240
                  
      33   6580         
      37            
   second               
   time   99%            

[macduff]

Why not doing James Bond...lol

                  
   first 18   18   200   400   -380   20
   last 12   12   140   420   -380   40
   street   3   40   480   -380   100
                  
      33   380         
      37            
      89%            
                  
                  
                  
   first   18   3600   7200   -6960   240
   last   12   2380   7140   -6960   180
   street   3   600   7200   -6960   240
                  
      33   6580         
      37            
   second               
   time   99%            

i have no idea what that means, you scare me with -6960.
is it possible to simplify this.
it could be the answer. 

[macduff]

-