I think we are all wasting our time...

[gizmotron]

A Markov process is useful for analyzing dependent random events - that is, events whose likelihood depends on what happened last. It would NOT be a good way to model a coin flip, for example, since every time you toss the coin, it has no memory of what happened before. The sequence of heads and tails are not inter-related. They are independent events.

nolinks://nolinks.doctornerve.org/nerve/pages/interact/markhelp.htm

But of course this doesn't apply to you, because you're on the cutting edge! Stone-age math is for math nazis!  

Yet those same independent events can belong to sequences of global effect statistics and produce exact calculations for each independent spin.  Just because you have a fellow in the mathematics field that thinks like you do it does not mean his or your conclusions are valid. You are using the opinion of a "Subjective" thinker. You might like to acknowledge the existence of "Objective" thought. Go fish.

[gizmotron]

Why our GOD Giz?

You are My Roulette GOD!
How will I live without you!!!

You need to look to your future, where your head will soon be. You are on a journey, You are looking up the south end of a north bound dog. Proceed.

[gizmotron]

Yes My Gizmo

Jordan27 = troll

[Herb6]

A Markov process is useful for analyzing dependent random events - that is, events whose likelihood depends on what happened last. It would NOT be a good way to model a coin flip, for example, since every time you toss the coin, it has no memory of what happened before. The sequence of heads and tails are not inter-related. They are independent events.

-Thanks Bayes

@Gizmotron, above, This is why it doesn't work for roulette.  It's because each spin of the roulette wheel is an independent trial.  There's not a chance in the world of you proving otherwise.

@Spike, the number of pockets on the roulette wheel doesn't change.

[Noble Savage]

You are using the opinion of a "Subjective" thinker. You might like to acknowledge the existence of "Objective" thought.

LOL!

[JHM]

I don't think the game is unbeatable. You will never play all spins of a table. You will always play a timeline, and you need to catch more winners than losers, or exit when in plus. I still haven't found a methot that fits a certain timeline. I probably will never too, because I don't have the patience and time.

[potatochips]

It's interesting to note that our two national bozos still debate whether or not Roulette is beatable. They have been doing it on all boards since Roulette exists. Don't know why these bozos are on a quest to argue about the fact that Roulette is a random device you can't beat by using subjective skill. Sometime, someone should tell them: snap out of it, get a life or give a reason why you can beat Roulette consistently with a sound proof you can repeat it at will.

RBBBBBBR what's next ?

[Spike!]

the number of pockets on the roulette wheel doesn't change.>>>

So what. Correct info on the next spin still skews the odds in your favor.

[Spike!]

get a life or give a reason why you can beat Roulette consistently >>>

The reason is, the more you practice understanding how random works, the better you get.

[gizmotron]

Nice going guys, you get to dominate the fantasy world of fixed odds. You need me, I don't need you. You need to post here and I don't. I'm going to let you think you have one. It's the very worst thing I can do to you. You will think you have served a greater purpose. Now gloat over your minuscule achievement. I'm flushing you t**ds down the toilette.

[Spike!]

you get to dominate the fantasy world of fixed odds.>>>

The fixed odds only remain fixed if nothing in the game changes. If you gather info on the next spin that wasn't included when they figured the fixed odds, the new info changes the odds. Whats so hard for them to understand about this?

[Steve]

You will think you have served a greater purpose. Now gloat over your minuscule achievement. I'm flushing you t**ds down the toilette.

Gizmo I dont care why you posted this, but I've banned you for another 3 days. The next time I'll remove you. I dont care if you contribute once in a while, if this is the kind of trash you say at all.

[Spike!]

The poll is closed? I was just going to change my vote to Herb, to keep things balanced. Dang..

[medo]

Nice going guys, you get to dominate the fantasy world of fixed odds. You need me, I don't need you. You need to post here and I don't. I'm going to let you think you have one. It's the very worst thing I can do to you. You will think you have served a greater purpose. Now gloat over your minuscule achievement. I'm flushing you t**ds down the toilette.

Who need you???
Man you are really delusionist.
Now that you on probation for 3 days,will you stay there for ever pl.
Don't come back an d prove to us that you don't need us.

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

With my mechanical, progression based system, each spin,
(Baccarat hand), changes the odds, either towards or away from
a 'particular run' and therefore this changes my betting amount.

It's funny how each spin is independant, yet has such an
effect on the previous as well as the subsequent decisions!

Glenn.

[MiniBaccarat]

-