AI versus RNG

[superman]

Over the last year, after many hours of watching the marque spit out numbers I think I have now arrived at what I think is as close as you could possibly get to following the flow of RNG random. Over the last week I have added 2 extra event triggers to my script (it now has 6 in total) it plays on the EC's.

What I would like to ask fellow members is, if your method of attack gave you a return of, let's use todays session as an example, 417 attacks 3 losses (session started 8:20 am 3 hours ago) what progression would you use?

Currently I am using martingale 1,2,4,8,16,32 so each loss is 63 units, the reason I use marty is that the losses are few so the drawdown is not too bad, if anyone would like to look at todays output file as it may help to work out if I am using the correct progression, let me know. The file contains lines like this

TRIGGER OUTPUT W On 2 25

(W = WIN, On 2 means 2nd level of progression, 25 is running BR)

If you hate RNG or progression based methods, please don't bother posting, I hate playing live wheels as it takes toooo long. The script doesn't play roulette it plays the results of randoms flow.

[superman]

OK the session has ended for today, 973 attacks, 11 losses total units won 269, for those interested I have added the output file for you to see.

[Bayes]

So each "attack" is 6 spins right?  It depends on how many wins you're getting on average for each attack. If this is above expectation then you shouldn't have to use a progression at all, or only a very mild one.

[superman]

Hi Bayes

As I stated yesterday, 973 attacks (6 spins each) and only 11 times did it go over the 6 step progression, today so far 69 attacks no losses, yet, I think for the time being the progression will suffice, will post todays result file later on, this is all on real money, not play.

[Bayes]

superman,

Which RNG/casino are you using? how many spins have you tested the system on?

[superman]

OK today was a good one, 92 attacks NO losses, progression held fine, stopped early as I have other things to get on with.

Which RNG/casino are you using? how many spins have you tested the system on?

Will send you a pm about which casino & rng, how many spins, crickey, zillions, I have been developing this specific tool for about 4 months now, most of it's development was on play money, run it for a day on the laptop, work out where it tanked and fix, change, modify, repeat the normal testing methods, if at any stage it looked good I would run it against real money without placing actual bets just picking up triggers and letting it pretend to bet and see what the outcome was, to be totally honest with you, play money mode hasn't looked any different than real money mode, only snag is, in real mode as it communicates with their servers every spin I have had to back off the speed of the tool, the speed now looks like it's actually a human playing it which keeps it under the radar too.

[superman]

-