Vote to ban members

[Steve]

This poll doesnt mean I'm going to ban someone - I'm just getting a better idea of general consensus. If you are listed, it means nothing more than someone has complained about you. If you are not listed and feel you should be, well you arsehole.

PS:

1. If everyone would just "lighten up" and have a sense of humor, things would be a lot better. Perhaps have fun here. Discussions dont always need to be "productive" - we are people of common interest. But if discussions arent about roulette then they should be kept to the general area.

2. It may be that some of the so-called "negative" people speak the truth. For example, you could say someone is "full of shit" (negative/offensive), or that they are "incorrect, and here is the proof....." (constructive). Speaking plainly though, we all know within reason that many people are "full of shit".

3. I get the feeling trying to reason with some members is a waste of time, and nothing will change. It's like in society in general. There are dickheads, and we'd all be better off if they were gone. But we dont need to kill anyone here - just remove them from the forum. So give me feedback on who you think shouldnt be here. Sure this thread may turn into another storm but it's necessary to solve the problem.

[Steve]

Stackbundles, I added Number Six to the poll. No, we are not sword-fighting.

PS - If anyone changes their mind, you can 'remove vote' and change it.

PPS - If anyone thinks someone else should be in the list, let me know. It is not a poll to just piss off your "enemy" by voting for them, but of course some people are inclined that way - actually it's that kind of person I dont want here.

[Number Six]

What rules have I broken?

You can't justify a banning without saying why. It's absurd.

[Mr J]

I'm giving a polite comment..... what is it with the polls? Yes, I did vote, for no one to be banned. Ken

[A3on47]

Sorry Steve but I don't understand this thread.

You put there members with no reason at all for being banned !

Gizmo is a member like everyone else. He just claims that can win by playing at trends, and we have to respect it (In my opinion I believe it is possible). And I don't saw any disrespectful behavior by him anywhere.

Spike just hates losing systems! ahah  But he just tries to protect some members to lose money. Sometimes he is aggressive in his words, but still not a big deal.

Fender1000 was always nice to everyone. I don't see a reason to ban him

StackBundles, well he have an aggressive behavior, but it's just his way to be. He can't see nobory saying it doesn't work xD  Still no way to ban him too I think.

Number Six, same as spike. Kinda negative in his words, but a very helpful and respectful member.


I think you should worry more with some multi accounts we have here in the forum, trying to sell stuff.

No hard feelings Steve.
Just saying my opinion

Best regards,
Afonso

[gizmotron]

I think fender1000 should be removed from the poll because he made a real contribution to playing Roulette. He discovered the idea of betting against the very rare pattern/sequence from occurring very often. This idea of attacking a very rare sequence is very interesting. I don't think we have seen the end of this idea.

Just my 2 cents...

[Mr J]

Whats his method called?  Ken

[Number Six]

theres defo something going on with you and number six am I right?

How exactly?

[Number Six]

you tell me

Is that supposed to be an answer? You said it, there must be a reason, so what are you talking about?

[Steve]

What rules have I broken?

You can't justify a banning without saying why. It's absurd.

Like I said:

1. if your name is up there, it means people have complained about you. It has nothing to do with me.

2. It is not a poll to actually ban someone. As I explained it's more for me to get a general idea of what the members think.

More than one of the listed people are aggressive - too aggressive. Yes, this IS a problem. It is often offensive beyond mere opinions. Sure aggressive or not, the people may often be correct with what they say. But how they go about it is usually the problem - it pushes people away from contributing, and reduces forum integrity.

So to keep the forum productive and friendly,

a. ban members that stifle productivity, in whatever way

b. let the offensive and/or aggressive behavior continue... because these people dont clearly break the rules, but their behavior does ultimately contribute to an unfriendly and less productive place?

To be perfectly blunt: I dont at all like the way some of you speak to other members. But some of you are good contributors too. Someone like Wendel just posts bullshit and goes in circles - sure he can type, but that's not contributing. I need to figure out which members are ultimately either good or bad for the forum, and realistically I dont have time to make informed decisions so I need to rely on feedback from members, hence the poll.

PS - I dont even know why you people are arguing 99% of the time. Do you really affect each others lives that much? Are the issues really that important?

[Steve]

Number Six, please dont expose our secret love affair. I wont let you be on top next time.
(in other words, why does everything need to be a struggle, always some kind of argument like some people live for it, always something needing to be going on? Just get on with it)

[Number Six]

Number Six, please dont expose our secret love affair. I wont let you be on top next time.
(in other words, why does everything need to be a struggle, always some kind of argument like some people live for it, always something needing to be going on? Just get on with it)

Why should I idly stand around while stackbundles makes up nonsense?

[Spike!]

I voted that nobody be banned. This isn't a democracy, where the members decide who goes and who stays. Its up to the mods and the ower to do that. If somebody posts a system that has no chance of winning and you say so, you are labeled a 'hater'. Its like people don't want to be warned a truck is about to hit them. Gamblers ar extremely competitive and it shows on gambling forums. Go and look at a sports betting forum, if your're a newbie they eat you for breakfast. To be interesting , every forum needs balance. Herb and Six balance out Fender and Stack. Why would you want any of them gone, it makes no sense.

[Steve]

Rather than bite back, report poor behavior. In this case, it's not exactly large enough to be called "poor behavior". It was just a stupid comment, and it wasnt even worth responding to.

[Steve]

Spike, yes there needs to be balance. But there is a line as to what's acceptable from any member. It is good to speak the truth, but bad to do it in an aggressive and condescending tone. With all the egos around, it's bound to erupt. Who's penis really is biggest? We may never know.

[Steve]

-