Are the encyclopedias and mathematicians correct?

[Steve]

Wheel bias was a problem but it is no longer an issue.

Every wheel has a bias to some degree, and it varies under specific conditions. It is far more common than you think.

Gizmo what you described about "randomness" is the wrong way of looking at it. Believe me you want to be looking at waves within waves within waves etc etc. The universe is dynamic, and roulette is part of it.

[gizmotron]

Every wheel has a bias to some degree, and it varies under specific conditions. It is far more common than you think.

Gizmo what you described about "randomness" is the wrong way of looking at it. Believe me you want to be looking at waves within waves within waves etc etc. The universe is dynamic, and roulette is part of it.

You can use any symbolism, correlation, or parallel cognition process you want to. In the end you are telling me to look at the changes that occur, that you can speculate on in a favorable way. You are just telling me to learn how to make a bet selection based on some spectral formation that is familiar to you. I wonder if you can refer to all this as reading wave forms?

Get this. And please try to be open minded for a moment. I suspect that you understand these wave principles. That you know how to use them to make bet selections and because of them. Now. Can these bet selections have times when using them works very well? If that's true then do these bet selection methods also have times when the bets lose very badly? And last, are there times when the bet selections just don't produce effective results or great losses? I was just wondering.

[bombus]

...and the next number is?     

[Steve]

Can these bet selections have times when using them works very well? If that's true then do these bet selection methods also have times when the bets lose very badly? And last, are there times when the bet selections just don't produce effective results or great losses? I was just wondering.

Anything can happen in the short term. Analysis takes a lot of spins but conditions are always changing, and so are patterns. Sure there are varied results over say 10 spins or so, but this is very short term and you cant look at that. If you look at say 10,000 spins and the results, the results you can expect over another 10,000 spins are roughly the same.

PS- Bombus, it's #32.

[Spike!]

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.>>>

Right now I'm at the being ridiculed stage..

[Spike!]

let's see if anyone here has guts to prove they can win on the ECs.>>>

I prove it to the casino every time I play. They seem to have no interest in reverse engineering it, either. Works for me..

Herb is the nerd in the middle:

[bombus]

PS- Bombus, it's #32.

C R A P!...how did you do that? Damned 32 took my $200 off the table!

[bombus]

-