Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Question regarding DS

Started by Mr J, July 01, 2010, 05:04:07 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mr J

This is half a rip and the other half, a serious question. I do know that at some casinos around the world or the US (whatever) that 'no more bets' is called before the ball is spun. I would bet my nuts, the percentage of these casinos is SMALL. Question being.....if DS was this great way to play (you could make millions!  :thumbsup:) why not have this rule at every casino?

It would save the casino ALOT of money, no? So many people (cough) have this skill of watching the dealers release point, rotor speed etc., it would make more sense to wave of betting EARLY. Also, how would the hidden computers be used if such a rule was enforced? >> Everyone gets 15-20 seconds to lay bets, no more bets is called. Then the ball is spun. Why does the casino NOT take more counter measures against such an EASY way to win? (cough) Ken

I have cookies


What is a dealer signature ?

O_o


Noble Savage

First of all, whether they work or not, DS methods don't usually require betting after the ball is spun. You must be talking about VB.

Secondly, VB is not "easy", your lame system is (but I assume you were just being sarcastic as usual). Modern VB is rocket science to system players and those who have no clue.

Last but not least, are you serious? You really think the casinos will prohibit betting after the ball is spun just because 1 out of each 1000 (or so) roulette players is trying to play VB? Do you realize how that would slow down the action, especially on busy tables?

A decent percentage of bettors place their bets (or continue placing their bets) after the ball is spun, the casino would have 2 choices: Either increase the time for placing bets to allow all players to place their bets, slowing down an already slow game therefore decreasing daily return; OR keep the same betting time but accept that there will be less bets placed (since the late bettors won't be able to place/finish their bets), therefore decreasing daily return.

It's not worth it.

Jakkalsdraai

Good question.

Is dealer sig a pattern that a specific dealer achieves because of constant spinning? What does that mean? Does it mean that the same sectors are hit? Does it means that every spin might be 12 pockets CW from the last? Does dealer signature mean a certain distance from the number that the ball is released with certain dealers? If any of the previous mentioned scenarios then surely rotor speed must be a constant. So for a dealer  to constantly spin a certain pattern the rotor speed must be 100% the same.'

Just my 2,5 cents


Davey-Jones

This is half a rip and half a serious answer. Someone as smart as ken should have been able to figure this answer out if he just took a couple minutes and thought about it.

Are the majority of roulette players DS players? Or impulsive gamblers? Are you telling me that it is in the casino's best interest to call nmb's prior or at the spin to thwart the half dozen DS players the casino might see in a couple months and lose all that extra revenue caused by impulse last minute betting by all the 100's and even 1000's of other patrons? It's the same reason they don't ban progressions. Progressions and impulsive late betting make the casino money. Use your head next time.

Mr J

The question is somewhat rhetorical. You can correct me all you want but the MAIN question still remains. If watching the dealer, how he spins/release point etc. (call it HOWEVER you want)  could be an ADVANTAGE to you....why would they NOT call 'no more bets' before the ball is spun? It would NOT slow down the game.  Ken

Mr J

"Are you telling me that it is in the casino's best interest to call nmb's prior or at the spin to thwart the half dozen DS players the casino might see in a couple months and lose all that extra revenue" >>> Yes. You mentioned a half dozen but I see no MATH from you (Davey-Jones) in regards to OVERALL loss from the casino. Soooo DS/VB (whatever) is a HUGE advantage for the player (cough)......how much (net) are these 'half dozen' guys taking in compared to the other moron bettors?  Think about it a little better next time Davey-Jones, I thought you were a bit brighter than that?  Ken

Noble Savage

I love how he asks a question, you answer him, and then he acts as if YOU didn't understand the question, and rephrases/alters it.

Quote from: Mr J on July 01, 2010, 06:17:56 PM
It would NOT slow down the game.  Ken

Okay, you know better.

Mr J

"and rephrases/alters it" >>> Can you give me an example? I THINK what you mean is......you won't answer me based on not understanding my point/question. So to be POLITE, I try and ask it in a different manner BUT the SAME question. I'm still looking for an answer. This big bad DS/VB could wipe out casinos (lol), why not call no more bets, then spin? It would eliminate 'you guys' from making millions!  :thumbsup: Ken

Mr J

"It's the same reason they don't ban progressions" >>> Sure they do, kind of. Its called max payout.  Ken

Davey-Jones

Tell us again how much YOU win ken? hahahahahahahahaha!

Mr J

More than you (in terms of roulette). So for the RECORD, Davey-Jones, I can jot down for NOT answering. Cool, makes me look better.  Ken

Noble Savage

I gave you a pretty clear answer, but you pretend like I haven't. It's not the first time you do it.

Your sole purpose from such threads is not to receive an answer about something, but to merely try to look smart and discredit AP.

Why discuss with a person like you? Like Kelly says, there are much better things to do. You want to believe whatever pleases you and makes you feel better about yourself. :haha:

So here it is: AP doesn't work, never have, never will. There, that should sustain you for a few days (before the need comes back and you start another AP bashing thread disguised in a stupid question).

Mr J

"I gave you a pretty clear answer, but you pretend like I haven't" >>> Instead of posting other NON-related items, could you PLEASE post your answer, again if needed? Short and to the POINT please. This is NOT your answer (you are trying to be funny) >> "So here it is: AP doesn't work, never have, never will." << Ken

Mr J

"and discredit AP" >>> 100% true. No s**t, really? Ken  :yahoo:

Mr J

-