My holy grail challenge for all

[Spike!]

Give people credit for some intelligence>>>

Thats a tall order. It sure is in short supply around here. You have no idea..

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

Roulette is unbeatable: FACT. 
It's my belief that anyone who claims to win consistently (whether they are openly trying to sell it or not) are running a scam. If they're not deliberately misleading people then they're merely ignorant.

In the past Bayes would have been saying
"Don't listen to them, they're only saying the Earth is round so they can sell you a boat"!!

There are no 'subtleties' to be employed. Every new spin is independent of the last. 

SOME of the 'subtleties' are the ability to vary the amounts bet & choose when to bet or not!! 

As for "Every new spin is independent of the last", that is correct,
but as I'm looking at betting on a "run' of R, R, R, R, or the Black equivalent or R, B, R, B, etc
AND these ALWAYS come up in each 200 spin 'game'

I tried to put Spike straight on the Gambler's fallacy, unfortunately he didn't seem to understand. 

Spike tried to put You straight on the Gambler's fallacy, unfortunately You didn't seem to understand.   


Glenn.

[albalaha]

Dear KA2,

I totally agree. If you have the holy grail, there would be NO REASON at all to sell it, cause you have access to unlimited money stream already. So ergo selling holy grail equals SCAM.

please do not comment like this, where did you see me selling this holy grail?
Dear Spike,

If you MathBoyz put all your favorite writings in one place, you would have a Bible for your cute little religion.

you are very sarcastic and humorous. I do not believe mathematics can help winning roulette otherwise Albert Einstein would not have surrendered to it.
Dear Bayes,

Roulette is unbeatable: FACT.  But there are plenty of people who try to take advantage of the gullible by touting their systems in the hope that they will make a few $. albalaha has already posted on Victor's forum that he will be selling his system for $10,000. But if you contact him privately he may let you have it for the knock-down price of $100!

Firstly, my wish to sell it for money has been removed from that post upon my request, go and see again. Secondly do not ever allege anybody without knowing a fact, who the hell I offered my holy grail to sell for $100, your stepfather?

[Ka2]

Dear KA2,please do not comment like this, where did you see me selling this holy grail?

No? I thought you were selling your system for 10.000...

[Bayes]

Dear Bayes, Firstly, my wish to sell it for money has been removed from that post upon my request, go and see again.

Glad to hear it.

Secondly do not ever allege anybody without knowing a fact, who the hell I offered my holy grail to sell for $100, your stepfather?

I said you may sell it for $100. The point being, that once you have made it known that it's on the market, you're likely to get offers.

My stepfather? I suppose that's supposed to be some kind of insult in your culture. I don't have one, but knock yourself out.

[Bayes]

G'day,

SOME of the 'subtleties' are the ability to vary the amounts bet & choose when to bet or not!! 

As for "Every new spin is independent of the last", that is correct,
but as I'm looking at betting on a "run' of R, R, R, R, or the Black equivalent or R, B, R, B, etc
AND these ALWAYS come up in each 200 spin 'game'

Glenn.

Is your system 100% mechanical?

[albalaha]

Dear Bayes,

I said you may sell it for $100. The point being, that once you have made it known that it's on the market, you're likely to get offers.

Do not try to be a clairvoyant and make silly and insultive predictions. I do not tolerate nonsense and always fight liers.

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

Is your system 100% mechanical?

Yes!

Glenn.

[bombus]

G'day,

Yes!

Glenn.

Go Glenn!

[Bayes]

Dear Bayes,  Do not try to be a clairvoyant and make silly and insultive predictions. I do not tolerate nonsense and always fight liers.

I don't tolerate nonsense either, which is why I posted in this thread in the first place. What's really insulting is you assuming we're all idiots here and can't see a sales pitch thinly disguised as a laughable challenge to 'disprove' your system. What scammers will never never never do is tell you why they need to sell their system if it works so great. Or if they do it's something like 'I'm dying of an incurable disease and wish to pass on my hard-earned knowledge so that others may benefit and hurt the evil casinos'. Right, that's plausible. 

If you want to prove your system to us  then why don't you take up Steve's $100,000 challenge? If it passes you'll have plenty of people eager to buy, but then why would you need them? 

[albalaha]

Dear Bayes,

I don't tolerate nonsense either, which is why I posted in this thread in the first place. What's really insulting is you assuming we're all idiots here and can't see a sales pitch thinly disguised as a laughable challenge to 'disprove' your system. What scammers will never never never do is tell you why they need to sell their system if it works so great. Or if they do it's something like 'I'm dying of an incurable disease and wish to pass on my hard-earned knowledge so that others may benefit and hurt the evil casinos'. Right, that's plausible. 

If you want to prove your system to us  then why don't you take up Steve's $100,000 challenge? If it passes you'll have plenty of people eager to buy, but then why would you need them?   

why are you so scared of my system. If you do not want to contribute to my challenge, you better stay away and don't tell me by your superman like vision. Go to rouletteforum.cc and see my posted result of a spin session provided by thomasgrant, a veteran player which he himself admitted to be very difficult. Use your superman vision there and stop calling names. see result in  attached word file.

[Bayes]

albalaha,

The reason why your challenge is meaningless is because we don't know how your system works, so you could make up the results and nobody would know any better. On the other hand, if we knew how it worked, there wouldn't be any point in us posting spins because we could do all the testing ourselves.

see my posted result of a spin session provided by thomasgrant, a veteran player which he himself admitted to be very difficult.

More gibberish. There is no such thing as a 'difficult' session. A session is only difficult with regard to a particular system. That session may in fact turn out quite easy for your system, and another 'easy' session sent in by someone else may be difficult for it.

I'd like to know why you even considered selling your system? (but I don't expect an answer).

[albalaha]

Dear Bayes,
                   Empty words doesn't have any value. If you or anybody doubts that I have manipulated the results in thomas grant challenge and it is not as per any system come ahead to challenge me. I do not need a session to be easy or hard, you are righttherethat thereis no tough or easy session. My holy grail can win all sessions be it RNG or Live roulette, European or American wheel that is why it is holy grail. I will handle every session by a single method and tremendous wins everytime- upto 50% of your bankroll. Anybody else wish to give a challenging session of live roulette?

[Spike!]

which he himself admitted to be very difficult.>>

I just looked at them, they look like a set of average spins to me. Point out where they differ from what yu are used to seeing.

[Bayes]

Empty words doesn't have any value. If you or anybody doubts that I have manipulated the results in thomas grant challenge and it is not as per any system come ahead to challenge me.

Yes, empty words have no value, and that's all you have. A real challenge is where you don't know what's coming next, just like in a casino. Anyone can curve-fit the results like Mr Chips did with his systems.

[Bayes]

-