Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

My holy grail challenge for all

Started by albalaha, July 09, 2010, 12:10:31 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

albalaha

 :yahoo: ;D Dear Friends,
                         Finally I could do what no one ever did. I am very serious. I have developed a very easy to understand system which is purely unbeatable. It gives slow but steady income. You can earn playing with live dealer online preferably beacause in that way you can earn money in the comfort of your home plus this purely winning system will remain unnoticed. I always hated the term "holy grail" but now after seeing its accuracy I can proudly call it one. Through this forum I openly challenge the entire roulette playing community to disprove me. I tell you a few things. Bankroll requirement: Minimum $1000 and maximum whatever you can have because it is safe and surefire. Table limit:1-500, it can be played on 1-100 also but when we are playing holy grail we should not take risk, I think skyvegas table having $1-$25000 would be best. Do not worry, normally you would not put more than $20 stake once. Earning: 15-50 units per hour, your unit may be $1 to $10 depending upon your capacity. Play more, earn more. Play bigger, earn bigger.
                                               I openly call upon all roulette experts including Steve and other system authors to disprove me. For this, you can send me any session you have ever witnessed(not manipulated one, you better send me verifiable sessions) of not less than 500 spins and my winnings shall not be less than $500 and my bankroll of $1000 will never be exhausted.I would play at table limit of $5-$500 by a single technique. If anybody wants to challenge and he is serious send me spin sessions of live roulette in this thread and I will mark my winning number and total winning units here. Best of luck

MiniBaccarat

G'day,

Congratulations on finding your HG!!

Now keep it to yourself like the rest of those
of us that also worked hard to develop one.

As the wise man said, 'never wise up the chumps'!!

Glenn.

mistarlupo


Bayes

Your challenge is meaningless. If no-one knows your system how can it be disproved? So if we send spins you will post what you would have won, do you realise how ridiculous that is and how it proves nothing?

Anyway, there is already a proof which says that NO system can win.

MiniBaccarat

G'day,
Quote from: Bayes on July 09, 2010, 11:08:09 AM
Anyway, there is already a proof which says that NO system can win.

Your comment is just one of the Gamblers Fallacies that Spike has tried to explain about!
Your lack of ability to grasp this notion goes hand in hand with a lack of knowledge of
what roulette is and the subtleties that can be employed in a 'system' to make it work!

Glenn

albalaha

Dear Mistarlupo,
                               yes this system would beat RNG too.
Dear Bayes,
                              Anything I post is bound to earn
and, Dear MrBaccarat,
                              you might not have seen a system earlier and it is time to see one.

Bayes


Bayes

Quote from: MiniBaccarat on July 09, 2010, 02:55:33 PM
G'day,
Your comment is just one of the Gamblers Fallacies that Spike has tried to explain about!
Your lack of ability to grasp this notion goes hand in hand with a lack of knowledge of
what roulette is and the subtleties that can be employed in a 'system' to make it work!
Glenn

There are no 'subtleties' to be employed. Every new spin is independent of the last.  :ok:

I tried to put Spike straight on the Gambler's fallacy, unfortunately he didn't seem to understand.  :'(

kav

Quote from: Bayes on July 09, 2010, 11:08:09 AM
Anyway, there is already a proof which says that NO system can win.

There is no such proof.
If you believe there is, please post it.




Please calm down and keep an open mind. Otherwise I really wonder what are you doing here? Why are you here? What are you trying to gain and what are you trying to offer by your participation to the forum?

Spike!

I tried to put Spike straight on the Gambler's fallacy, unfortunately he didn't seem to understand.>>>

Hey, just because I won't put blinders on and join your religion, doesn't mean I'm an idiot..

albalaha

The main problem with you guys, you just do not accept anything new an innovative and get frustrated. Bayes and Spike didn't you see anybody winning regularly in roulette? You explain gamblers fallacy and I explain my doctrine of uneven distribution which speaks the real and practical reason of a casino winning constantly against all players and how to exploit it for your gain. Bays if you are so frustrated with this game you do not need any forum. Go and sleep. You are a frustrated and pessimist gambler, a looser. :haha:

Bayes

Quote from: kav on July 09, 2010, 08:33:47 PM
There is no such proof.
If you believe there is, please post it.

Please calm down and keep an open mind. Otherwise I really wonder what are you doing here? Why are you here? What are you trying to gain and what are you trying to offer by your participation to the forum?

I do have an open mind, but it's not so open that my brain falls out.  ::)

Roulette is unbeatable: FACT.  But there are plenty of people who try to take advantage of the gullible by touting their systems in the hope that they will make a few $. albalaha has already posted on Victor's forum that he will be selling his system for $10,000. But if you contact him privately he may let you have it for the knock-down price of $100!

It's my belief that anyone who claims to win consistently (whether they are openly trying to sell it or not) are running a scam. If they're not deliberately misleading people then they're merely ignorant. Either way, the facts need to be given, and there are very few in evidence around here.

You'll find the mathematical proof in the wikipedia entry for 'roulette'.

Spike!

Roulette is unbeatable: FACT.>>

Wrong. Geez...

It's my belief that anyone who claims to win consistently (whether they are openly trying to sell it or not) are running a scam.>>

Wrong. Geez...

>>You'll find the mathematical proof in the wikipedia entry for 'roulette'.>>

If you MathBoyz put all your favorite writings in one place, you would have a Bible for your cute little religion.

Bayes

Spike, all you have is hot air. Give people credit for some intelligence, they can see through your bluster.

Ka2

I totally agree. If you have the holy grail, there would be NO REASON at all to sell it, cause you have access to unlimited money stream already. So ergo selling holy grail equals SCAM.

Ka2

-