If someone would tell you...

[Jean-Claud]

If someone would tell you that he found a way to beat randomness on the ECs into his favour by a combination of probabilities would you believe him?

If he would tell you that every person has lost  trying to win with a way that is FLAT but he found a way that is ROUND and it is taking care of everything in order to win would you believe him?

If he would tell you that every outcome is independent but all togeather are making a combination in probability that it just can t escaspe from a CERTAIN BALANCE!!!!

If he would tell you that he knows when a bet is having grater chances/advantage to hit so he can bet it havier than an other bet that it is still in advantage but not so much so he would bet it but lighter.

If he would tell you that the way is so safe and sure that it needs only 50 chips to be covered would you believe him?

If he would tell you that there is chance NEVER to lose with this way but if you will lose it would be only because someone cheated on you or something happened that would happen 1 in 100 years would you believe him?
Please only sirious answers

Oh and I am not selling ANYTHING ,as I have never sold anything .

[elmo]

I could quite easily believe a lot of that except for just needing 50 chips. I would say that if he thinks this is true, then he needs to go back and do a lot more testing and he will find days when 200 chips are not enough. This is the reality of it. When a player gets lucky, he can win hundreds of chips from the house. So assuming someone had a really good winning system, it is still possible for the casino to get lucky and wipe out your trip bankroll. For anyone to suggest otherwise would be misleading.

[Jean-Claud]

Thank you for the sirious answer.
And this is why I told that 1 in 100 years maybe the loss will come....

The reason why a system is winning is because it takes care of 1 thing...but when the 2nd will happen,it will lose.
Now an other system is winning cause it is taking care of the 2md thing......but when the 1st will happen,it will lose.

if a system had taken care of both things...it can t lose!or it can but it will be reallyyyyyyyyyyyy rare

[elmo]

Any winning system needs to strike a balance. You can have systems that win hundreds of chips on a good day and then lose hundreds of chips on a bad day. Like you say, this would be because this type of method was capturing one particular element and taking advantage of it, but when that element was missing, then the losses are going to stack up. How can you combine the best of everything and at the same time have a rewarding bet. It is very difficult.
What would this kind of system look like? It would need to contain some very strong and dominant features that were present most of the time.  In fact I think you would need several of these that could all morph together which would give you a strong probability of getting some decent winning sequences. Finding all that is difficult enough, but then to put it all together into a playable package would probably be the neatest trick of the lot.

[GogoCro]

Its like question; what was first: chicken or egg?

[Jean-Claud]

Thanks ELMO for ur reply
No u don t need hundreds of spins because even if in the begining u will lose some bets because u didn t know what has happened befor u sit at the table u will lose very little because the bets will be VERY light(1-2-3 chips the most)
After these losses(if u will have any at all) the 2 things will start having bigger imbalance so eventually ur bets will be ACCURATE!

I can play by tracking this method easily with a pen and papper(u need a little practice over 30-40 spins) but after that  u do it like u were dojng it forever....

I would like to make a BOT according to it but I don t know anyone that can make BOTS and be trustfull at the same time...

Now as for a RX code to test it further I think it can t be done because the 1 of the 2 THINGS that it must calculate is very complicated for a Code.

I just tested the worst session ever and it ended with the desairable Winning target(of +15 chips) after 84 spins(the longest of all  I have tested)and the  DOWN inside the session was just -38 chips.(also the worst ever)
The avarage is making +15 chips  in about 30 spins...and the biggest down before the HELL SESSION was -18.

[snoowly]

why not but i saw and i read so much things about roulette, it is difficult for me believe this and like most persons, we can believe what we can see. u will not say me the contrary.

anyway, i can see u are searching very much one system, one strategy, some rules, one way to play the more easily that if it exists and if u find one , just u will merits.
u make effort for post some strategy, some system here and put on evidence some things and that's very great from you

what can i say more now

[Kyla Shooter]

i take everything i read with a grain of salt.

[Jakkalsdraai]

I take everything I read with a grain of salt.

Kyla ............... on this forum change the quantities of salt from a grain to a bucket!

In future take everything you read with a bucket full of salt!

Cheers
jakk

[bombus]

Kyla ............... on this forum change the quantities of salt from a grain to a bucket!

In future take everything you read with a bucket full of salt!

Cheers
jakk

I like salt. 

[nexus]

Hi Jean-Cluad,

if I would believe such a message would depend it I know the person well or not.  When not, I think  it would be hard for me to believe it.  Better is to see it at the table.  But, I think nothing is impossible in this world and people have only a small piece of  knowledge.

Regards
Nexus

[Davey-Jones]

I would believe him, but only after I wired him the 25K that he asked for along with my credit card and account numbers.

[Jakkalsdraai]

I would believe him, but only after I wired him the 25K that he asked for along with my credit card and account numbers.

Welcome back buddy!

[Jakkalsdraai]

-