Gems From Gizmo

[Spike!]

Since Gizmo says he'll be leaving us shortly, here are some of his Gems from the Past. You know, some posts of his that put you to sleep and made you say "HUH?" and gave you a headache. Enjoy:

{Play globally. Now what do I mean by that? You play during optimal sections of your session when wins are grouped together in streaks of wins or dominances of wins. Your losses can group together too. You play the loss group with a minimum bet and you play the win group ten times that.)


{In randomness there are characteristics to different forms or states available to it, and that could easily be described as the alphabet of randomness. Randomness follows probability when it is at it's neutral state. In other words, what you see happening is right along the lines of distribution expectations for long term results, as a temporary state. So one aspect of randomness is to notice if it is above or below that trend line for the normal temporary state.}

{Just about all of you can't see this because you don't understand the use of it. The point is to search for what is working. If you enter a stretch of patterns, where most of the first moves to bet them loses, then don't do that. You have a dominance for when first moves lose. There is dominance in everything you attempt. They exist as above the base line, below the base line, on the base line, and forms of chop. Not only does it apply to pattern recognition and clustering analysis but it applies to the win loss, bet selection process too. There are base lines for successful stretches of the gambling session. It's everywhere if you teach yourself how to see it.}

{There is nothing expected. The flow of data will transition across the baseline while in motion. The data flow of randomness is a moving target. That's why you must change with the flow. The baseline is not a moving target. It's a reference to what is happening that is in motion. You can see motion if you contrast it against a stationary object. Hence the phrase "reading randomness." You can make a winning move while betting the correct side of the baseline, while it is in a state of dominance, either side. That's what is wrong with binomial distribution as a stationary object and applying it to moving targets.}

{Here is an invaluable hint: Don't bet the dozens unless the state of advantage is working in them while you bet. In other words don't bet 12 or 24 numbers per bet unless they are in a favorable state. That's why I track nine different dozens, that nine make up three sets. They still dominate as unfavorable most of the time. But when it's working it's like winning almost all bets. There must be a stand off bet or no bet method in order to wait to win. Of course those that think you can't wait for an advantage have probably not spent much time doing it. It makes no sense to bet the dozens when they are in a state of chaos.}

{All I can do is reflect what the global effect means to me. I see times when streaks run in packs. I see small streaks of reds running with small streaks of blacks. At the same time, when that happens, sometimes the other ECs do the same thing. So the global effect migrates across different tracked groups at the same times. You might say that the global effect has a strength percentage rate to it. A single isolated dominance does not reflect the simultaneous existence of a noticeable global effect. I use the global effect because when it is present it is like a fortune teller saying "go for it you fool."  I find that attacking roulette with the global effect working is like taking free money from an ATM machine.}

[gizmotron]

Wow, that's very interesting Spike. It never surprises me when my students begin to see this phenomenon of randomness. I'm betting you don't understand it either Spike. After all, you have been harping for three weeks that I don't have anything. It's clear to see. You don't really understand randomness. There is a difference in discovering all this on your own and having someone show you a road map. Spike must be a scammer. He's been piggy backing on my hard work all this time. That's actually plausible. What with his attempt to sell his baloney for $10,000 a pop. And now we see that he has no clue about randomness. He just says he can read randomness. Nice going Spike. You outed yourself. I wonder where all the posts by Spike are explaining randomness? There is a vacuum of them you know. What a laugh. Spike is a scammer and that's all. Yes, I did get sucked into his mean dream. He's been using me to set up his victims. No more.

[NS]

You know, some posts of his that put you to sleep and made you say "HUH?" and gave you a headache.

Thanks to both of you, we're quite familiar with such posts.

[Kelly]

Laurel and Hardy at it again.  Maybe gizmotronic could show us a string of EC`s that triggered a bet. I don`t even wanna know what the bet is.  Just the string that triggered the bet, but that day is not gonna come up. Ever.  Im not even sure the priest speaches is roulette related but who knows.  It seems like he is hypnosing himself into some sort of trauma or coma before he has finished typing.

[Nathan Detroit]

Kelly,

Better be prepared to fork over  $ 500.-- for this  particular   EC  trigger bet . 

Excerpt  from Gizmo`s  gems published by Spike:
n*****The data flow of randomness is a moving target. That's why you must change with the flow. The baseline is not a moving target******

Advice  from Nathan Detroit : With this  in mind   no alcoholic  beverages  before or  while   sitting at  the table .

[Spike!]

It seems like he is hypnosing himself into some sort of trauma or coma before he has finished typing>>>

I'm not poking him with a stick anymore, he's gone off the deep end. He mostly just rants now, like an inmate in Wendels asylum. When they get this far round the bend, its best to just ignore them..

[Kelly]

500, no problem. But i doubt he will sell it to me.  Only 7 others.   After finding 10.000 exactly similar streaks, i will of course expect a refund if there were no significan`t unbalance to either side after that. 

Damned, he will now elevate 5 inches above the ground and speak  down to me in a weird voice and tell me that the global effect and the global warming is going to turn me and my family into bright red light and dissapear as a small red streak.

[Spike!]

Do you think he actually pretends to talk to the 'Lucky Seven', like they really exist? Thats a scary thought.

[bombus]

...With this  in mind   no alcoholic  beverages  before or  while   sitting at  the table .

Well that's me gone then.

[bombus]

-