Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Number Six - this post is for you ...

Started by I have cookies, August 23, 2010, 04:59:25 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

I have cookies


I fool around a littel and test a simple march with only four attempts wish has to overcome the gain of +1 unit.
Then you know advance betting strategy where you can use seven units as flat betting size and lower the bets and never lose once you gain +1 and in the same time get two to four free rides to gain a total of 8 or 11 units.

The rules are as follows.
The software capture STD at least 3.0 or above with minimum 16 events to 50 events.
Playing model is to track only one even money position every day and that the STD has to app er within the first 100.

The March that i fool around with wish is effective and simple.
Every attack is to bet twice.
There is a total of two attacks wish give us four attempts.
The math is simple that +1 unit has to overcome the amount of four attempts flat betting.


I have cookies


The March is to only play does sequence where the STD at 3.0 or above only have singel events present as underrepresented formation.
That means that among all does singels being overrepresented there is only allow to have singel series present as this is about singels contra series.

The first attack is made after two series chop RRR BB or if the distribution start to hovering RRR B RRR.
If first attack fails you attack after the first singel sere appears and play until +1 or -4 units.
In next post i will show you some samples.

I have cookies


This is the perfect sequence but not the perfect march wish is a littel different then the basic one i mention above.

O_o

I have cookies


Here is some short sampels.
R/B 20100731 R org



*****
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
B
R
B
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R <<< +1
*****
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
R
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B <<< +1


I have cookies


R org
20100730
R/B



*****
R
R
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
R
R
B
R
R
B
B <<< +1
*****
B
B
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
B
R
R <<< +1

*****
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
B
B
R
R
B
B <<< +1
*****
B
R
R
R
R
B
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
B
B
R
B
B
R
R <<< +1
*****
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
B
R
R
R
R
R
B
R -1
R +0
B
R -1
B -2
R
B
B
B
B
R
R -1
R
B
B +0
R
R <<< +1


I have cookies


If you run a quick test for 20 and you will find +20 or +12 enjoy and have fun.

O_o

I have cookies


0729 R org



*****
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
B
B
R
R
R
B
B <<< +1
*****

B
R
B
R
B
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
R
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
B
R
B
R
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
B -1
R -2
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
R -1
B
B +0
R
B -1
B +0
R
B -1
B +0
B
B
R
R <<< +1

*****
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
R
B
R
R
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
R
B
B
R
R <<< +1

*****

B
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series


*****
R
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B
R
B   <= 3 SD Singles vs Series
R
R
B
B
R
R <<< +1

*****


I have cookies

The fun part is Number Six that even I post this not many will know how this is any different towards all the stuff there is in this forum.

11/0 and so it keeps holding up 26/4 and so on.

You could test with 7 and after +7 lower for one more attack with 33 then if +3 attack once more with 11 ...
You will find the following results.

Units.
+1 +1 +8 +11 +8 +1 +11 +11 +11 +1 +1 +1 +8 +11 +8 +1 +1 +8 +8 +1 +11
Bankroll can be 28 units x 3 wish should put any one on the positive side of things.

O_o

mistarlupo

Quote from: I have cookies on August 23, 2010, 04:41:56 AM
My humble opinion is that apply math and probability based upon 37 or 38 degree of freedom is a waste of time as fluctuation come and go in various ways wish we can not predict or can we ...

O_o

You posted the above BEFORE you started this topic.

How is that you changed your mind in >15 minutes? ???

I have cookies


I have not change my opinion as i know corelation of correction exist not raw correction and i assume all does who use math and probability to play with or against events will allways fail.
End indication play wish give tendency towards change is present and real.

Series contra singels ... for does who enjoy this ...



*****
R
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
B
R
B <<< +1
*****

*****
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
R
B
B
R
B
R
B <<< +1

*****
B
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
R   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
B
R
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
R
B
R
R -1
R
B
R +0
R -1
R
R
B
R +0
R -1
B
B -2
R
R
R
R
B
B
R
B
R
R -3
B
R -2
R -3
R
B
R -2
R -3
R
B
R -2
B -1
R +0
B <<< +1
*****
R
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
R
R   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R <<< +1

*****
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
B
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B <<< +1

*****
B
R
R
R
R
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
B
B
R
B
B
R
R
R
R
B
B   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
B
R
B
B
R
B
R
B <<< +1

*****
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
R
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
R
R
R
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B   <= 3 SD Series vs Singles
R
R
R
R
B
R
B
R <<< +1

I have cookies


The difference with this post is that i can prove corelation of correction exist with significant statistics based upon math and probability and any one is free to prove me wrong.
It does not get much better then that.

It is not many who can measruing there knowledge with or against me.

O_o

mistarlupo

I've tested your theory (singles versus series), but I didn't get better than expected hit rate. Maybe I did something wrong, I dunno.

What do your statistics show? What is your edge according to it?

I have cookies

Quote from: mistarlupo on August 23, 2010, 08:03:21 AM
I've tested your theory (singles versus series), but I didn't get better than expected hit rate. Maybe I did something wrong, I dunno.

What do your statistics show? What is your edge according to it?

Well a test is simpel thing to do and if you did feel free to show us wish march you use.
Show us for how many attempts you attack with rules.
Then show us how the attmpts did overcome the amount of gain +1 or advance +1 +8 +11 ...

When you done that I will show you some real statistics.
The question is if you in the open let three even money position fluctation to be present or if you isolate the play.
The Perfect March is different then using basic methods.


I have cookies


I can also mention that we get STD of 2.5 and 3.0 with every sampel of 10 000 trails flat betting.

O_o

mistarlupo

Well, it was a while ago, but I think my test was based on one attack only after indication->indication->tendency.

mistarlupo

-