Kens idea

[Mr J]

"would start deleting basically every post that disagrees with them" >>> I have no issue with that and dont forget, this rule also benefits YOU, your threads.

"which means an even more retarded forum" >>> Well now hang on, a retarded forum *OR* a forum without arguing (or very little).  You mean to tell me, between those two options, you PREFER how it is now? Just asking. 

Let James start his goofy threads. That does not mean the SAME thread 40 times per day. lol This way, no one will post on his thread and if someone does, he'll most likely delete it. So what? It seems safe to me.  My question I asked in this thread is interesting, we'll see if anyone catches on.  Ken

[Mr J]

So what.....? How does that hurt you? What do you think about my question, any comment?  Ken

[I have cookies]

Mr J
There is imbalance in life it self - relations - there is imbalance in nature - forum and so on ...
Calling each other names and argue is just daily up and downs ...

There is does who know wish many would kill for and does who is lost at all times ...
Calibrate and find correlation is the melodi being a mod - same as being a parent ...

Share same space then apply to my all mighty rules or get lost is the tune of voice ... if ... some one use common sense and just lock post wish end up with garbage with does who can not behave ...
Remind and forget and move forward ...

I assume there is a easy task being a good mod for some and difficult task for others ...
One thing i am sure of that let a post starter pin point out who is who and wish stay or get deleted is a bad idea wish original comes from Victor ...

O_o

[mistarlupo]

It's been tried before. What happens is that thread starters (e.g. those that think they just got the grail and suddenly know everything) would start deleting basically every post that disagrees with them. What you get is threads with only people that agree with the thread starter (who is just misleading everybody), which means an even more retarded forum.

Agreed. It's been tried once already. Didn't work out well.

P.S. Marv, where the hell did your GILF-avatar go?! I really miss it.

[NS]

P.S. Marv, where the hell did your GILF-avatar go?! I really miss it.

hahahahah!

It wasn't a GILF, far from it.

[bombus]

It's been done before alright.

It failed quicker than bombus in a roulette challenge! lol!

Best way for people to clean up threads is to click on the *report to moderator* button at the bottom right of each post. Anyone can click that button, not just the thread starter. This at least makes mods aware of content that is bothering people. It may not get deleted, but it will get reviewed.

So click the button button clickers!

[Mr J]

"You must have intelligent people - that grasp basic probability- correcting the mistakes that are all too often made by the new system guys" >>> For the sake of NOT arguing, lets say I agree. It does not give a green light to attack someone. If someone posts they have a HG based on betting on red because its a pretty color, WHO CARES? Dont play it, let the poster THINK that betting on red is great. Why put the person down? You get nothing (as far as I know) out of ripping him OR leaving him alone. Post all day long that AP is great....I could careless.  Ken

[Boo_Ray]

Lets try the question again Boo Ray >> "I think quite a few here would NOT like this idea. Why? You'll have to dive into psychology to figure that out. Think about it......why would some NOT like this FAIR idea?  Its a very easy question."

Ask those who would NOT like that FAIR idea... For me it wouldn't be much diferent.. People with bad posting abilities will still spam the forum..

And bombus is right.. that idea is old.. it has been done before... But if you ask me it was still better than now

Best way for people to clean up threads is to click on the *report to moderator* button at the bottom right of each post.

Well that is a poor excuse... If every post reported would be deleted that would be even worse than self moderated threads... and the other problem is that moderators here don't have any idea how to be moderator and they should have taken some sort of school how to post first (specialy Mr J - who is unable to use "quote" and "modify" function and in other situations he is able to use "delete" function).. to have moderators like that it is just SAD.. very say .... So how would they be able to judge what should or what should not be deleted...

[bombus]

Well that is a poor excuse... If every post reported would be deleted that would be even worse than self moderated threads... and the other problem is that moderators here don't have any idea how to be moderator and they should have taken some sort of school how to post first (specialy Mr J - who is unable to use "quote" and "modify" function and in other situations he is able to use "delete" function).. to have moderators like that it is just SAD.. very say .... So how would they be able to judge what should or what should not be deleted...

The point is if you don't like what you see, report it.

If mods choose not to delete or modify the reported post, then you just have to get over it and move on... simple.

[Boo_Ray]

 

The point is if you don't like what you see, report it.

If mods choose not to delete or modify the reported post, then you just have to get over it and move on... simple.

so why are we talking about new ideas if you should just get over it that someone constantly spams the board and things like that.. Point is that I dont like to see double posts just because someone remembered to write something more that he forgot in answer before (but if I report it it would be wierd if second post would be deleted).. Even kids in kindergarden know how to post on forum but here we have a mod who doesnt.. Isnt that alarming that mod doesnt even know the basics .. It is like policeman who doesn't know how to drive a car..   

[Mr J]

"how to post on forum but here we have a mod who doesn't" >>> I have zero issues regarding posting. How to post, when to post, why to post, why to delete a post etc. Zero problems. If you dont agree with this statement, thats tough now isn't it?  Ken

[Mr J]

Back to my question (or opinion). I think 'certain' people here would not like my idea of self moderating because they would NOT be able to argue all that much. Thats my HONEST opinion. There are around 9 posters here that love to argue. Take this option away from them and they would be bored silly. Think about it..... If I had a thread that you posted on in a rotten manner, I delete your post and NO arguing.

If you had a thread regarding AP is great blah blah blah or Methods Suck etc., why would I post on that thread? It would only be deleted. Same result, no arguing. I find it odd that the people that are against my idea the MOST, just so happen to argue quite a bit. This is a coincidence? Hell no its not. They dont want that POWER of arguing taken away from them. Another question.....At Victors site, they self moderate and have little or no insulting. Another coincidence? Ken

[WannaWin]

they self moderate and have little or no insulting

But it gets more dumb each day.

There after number 27 hits it comes black. And I am not inventing it: nolinks://rouletteforum.cc/bet-selection/roulette-is-not-that-random/

Why these posts are not deleted? Lack of moderation I say.

[Mr J]

I agree its a goofy thread but dont respond to it. If I post a method that you think is STUPID and will never show a profit.......dont respond to it.  Ken

[mistarlupo]

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/thread-starter-to-be-able-to-delete-posts/

[mistarlupo]

-