Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What is more Likely to come

Started by pcrom, November 02, 2010, 07:48:41 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What is more Likely to come

3 Dozens in a row like 1 2 3 in 30 Spins
10 (90.9%)
4 Dozens in a row like 1 2 3 4 in 50 Spins
1 (9.1%)

Total Members Voted: 11

pcrom

Please Vote and i will reveal my Roulette System that i have not found anywhere else.

ivan19061

One Question.  Is your system have the power to beat roulette?
I mean no progression.  Thanks.

pcrom

IMHO yes i allready make money with it. . . 

ivan19061

Good to hear that.   :) But I play on numbers only.  Inside only. 

birdhands


Bayes

Why guess when you can calculate?  :D

Chance of 3-in-a-row in 30 spins ~ 65%
Chance of 4-in-a-row in 50 spins ~ 43%


WARRIOR

Quote from: PHASE2 on February 01, 2011, 11:13:08 AM
I have a Strategy called back to back which deals with strings of repeaters for dozens and columns.  I bet this isn't  too dis-similar to  Yours. Repeaters on The 2-1 chances are one of the most overlooked areas in.  Roulette. But we've all seen the ball hit the same dozen 4,5,6,7,8 times in a row.  

I once saw the ball land on dozen 2 (13-24) 10 times in a row on a live wheel.
its fair to that i have seen no repeats on dozen20 spins in a row.

MauiSunset

Quote from: PHASE2 on February 01, 2011, 11:02:18 AM
Lets get something straight. . . THERE IS NO METHOD THAT CAN BEAT ROULETTE, WITHOUT CLEVER RAISING OF STAKES AT SOME POINT. . . This is why the maths lovers think the game is impossible to beat.  But who ever heard of a champion poker player who NEVER RAISES STAKES? The skill is working out the best time to do it.  Thats the only way you beat roulette LONGTERM, anyone tells you different they're lying. . .

I don't know about that - sounds good but...

If you bring a huge bankroll with you and play a Martingale then you will eventually run out of money - that's why the table limits to Roulette are so low; to kill any Martingale.  If the table limits were like other games, say $5,000 then there would be many folks killing the Roulette tables each day - all using Martingale.

I believe that any MM techniques must be 100% adhered to and the low table limits taken into account.  These MM techniques can't be that aggressive.

When I play Blackjack I start the night off very conservative until I win enough money and take my money out of play and become much more aggressive with the casino's money. So any winning night at the casino should have at least 2 MM techniques in play; 1) MM with your money and 2) MM with the casino's money.

Roulette, to me, is just a form of entertainment - something to do after hours at the BJ table.  I've never played Roulette to the point of switching MM techniques so I just use a mild form and ONLY use it on any winnings I should get playing Red/Black.  That is, I NEVER increase a bet based on a loss - it's a loser in my book.


WARRIOR

Quote from: PHASE2 on February 01, 2011, 11:13:08 AM
I have a Strategy called back to back which deals with strings of repeaters for dozens and columns.  I bet this isn't  too dis-similar to  Yours. Repeaters on The 2-1 chances are one of the most overlooked areas in.  Roulette. But we've all seen the ball hit the same dozen 4,5,6,7,8 times in a row.  

I once saw the ball land on dozen 2 (13-24) 10 times in a row on a live wheel.
on my 4000 live spin I had 180 doubles show  ,thats for each dozen.

col1879

op, where's the strategy? have you posted it yet?

col1879

-