N0vocanes Holy Grail - True working system

[N0vocane]

.

[col1879]

Unfortunately I am on the ps3 and cannot view any attachments.

I take it the triggers do not always have to be high/low but could be red/black or odd/even?

[col1879]

Okay I have a couple of systems that I like. I'll pick one and start looking for the triggers you mentioned and see how it goes.

edit:

Test 1: +4

My ps3 keeps crashing it's not good for testing online roulette. Why do I not have a PC!

[GogoCro]

Maybe you can include that as systim runing after x spins you set trigger to 50% on reverse bets based on prvius H/L. Will that help to get smaller downtrend?

[GogoCro]

Learn to code in delphi, its really easy. Here our member tiago code bots in delphi.

[bene126]

I know coding in pascal and delphi as it is almost the same. I am very suprised with your post because last few days I am working on the same princip with graphs and now you maybe assure me that I am on the good way. But I dont undestand one thing. You are selling your system for 500 000 $ and now you want to develop new system based on graphs of your original system. Are you still selling your system or you gave it up and know working with each other ?

[bene126]

I have a working system already which I'm not posting. But I'm giving the principals behind the system here to see if we all could come up with something better. Yeah obviously the system is still for sale, but if we could somehow find a way to improve this system it would be beneficial to everyone.

Okey.Thank you for your answer. Hope we will get some good results.

[col1879]

****Typical scammer jargon. Only  jerks would ever buy a system. Graphs mean  nothing, zero , nada,**************

To continue.... blank, diddlysquat, gooseegg, insignificancy, naught, nil, nobody, nonentity, nought, nullity, squat, zilch, zip, zippo, zot!!!!

[Tiago2]

Ignoring the last few comments as it seems it's just a lot of testosterone going back and forth...

Interesting ideas N0vocanes, I've dappled with a similar approach in the past, coded a test module for it and learnt a lot. Not trying to bash your idea but rather give you something more to think about.  There are potential dangers to your approach that you don't seem to have seen.

Refer to the image attached.


What do you mean by "resistance" at bottom left of the image? Cheers.

-Tiago

[GogoCro]

Nathan, that kind of discusion is not polite. You can not acuse novocaine of being scammer juc cos he wants to sell his work.Period.
I toght very high of you, but now this..read the rules!!

[MauiSunset]

Your chart looks like a stock chart - buying breakout highs and selling breakout lows has no validity at all - zip.

Maybe I'm missing something but how do you short a Roulette wheel when a system is losing?

[Tiago2]

If you want you can give me a couple graphs of 100-3000 spins of a system of your choice so you know I'm not producing graphs that agree with my system and I'll mark everything for you. Then you can examine it and see if there are any inconsistencies.

I've attached two images, they're both the same graph. One is purposely wide so it's easier to see exactly how the bankroll was moving without the graph lines getting to clumped up.

[WARRIOR]

And how would you graph this in a casino?

[MauiSunset]

I can honestly say I am totally confused and see nothing to this technique.

This is very similar to a stock chart where there is a technique of buying breakouts to the upside and selling/shorting breakouts to the downside all based on past isolated highs and lows.

That system doesn't work in stocks and I don't see why it will work here.

Whipsaws will just kill you - you get a signal to buy and when the isolated high is exceeded you go long with some kind of trailing stop - that stop is hit 50% of the time.

Stocks, for the most part, are 80% correlated to the DJIA and using breakouts is not a more profitable way to trade than to just buy and hold.

In your example the "buy and hold" ending total of 1020 caused your overall total to correlate to it.

Repeat this experiment 100 times and 50% will be a winner and 50% will be a loser.

Sorry....

[MauiSunset]

I've repeated it over 3 million spins with a profit.

Sorry, as soon as you determine which isolated highs/lows to use you ignore many more - other folks will pick some of those.

This "system" is 100% correlated to just a simple flat-bet bet over the long run.

Again, I suggest that you demonstrate it in real time and you will find me to be correct - it is no better that just flat-betting each spin; over a long run you will be eaten alive by the "0".

[MauiSunset]

-