Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

24 numbers

Started by pablos, February 18, 2011, 03:22:09 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pablos

Hi

I thought about system for roulette like this. We track last 13 different spins and then start betting on the rest 24 numbers using some simple progression like 1,3, 9, 27. It is something like betting on 2 dozens. I tested it on some numbers and I found some bad serie when all 4 numbers where from these which where tracked before betting. Do you think is worth playing or think about ?

My other idea is to track some other number of spins nad betting some other number of numbers like for example track last 19 different spins and bet 18 other numbers using martignale.  

Other idea is to bet on 35 numbers. We chose 2 numbers which we leave. these two we chose randomly or I though about 2 hot numbers from table statistics. I assume that if some number was hot recently so it won't be hit soon. We could use two step progression 1, 36

pins

if you bet 35 numbers what stakes do you use. one dollar then you win one dollar.  100 dollars. outlay 3.500 i have found that the casino god one of the numbers you leave out will bob up. but the odds are in your favour.

pablos

I didn't play this way much but I made some test. I used RNG and before each spin I thought about two randomly chosen numbers and I was surprised becasue these numbers appeared more often that I thought. I dont have bankroll for 1$ and 36$ progression so I used some less but few times I played for 5 euros but only with one step progression. In my casino I can play from 0,1 euro. I think that ods actually aren't very good because we risk 1295 chips and probability that we hit our two numbers in one spin is 2/37 and that we do this two times in a row is (2/37)^2 = ca. once per 342 spins if I am correct but I think it is worth to try few times from time to time.

I have two ideas about playing. First is to change numbers every spin even if we are in progression, the second is to stay with numbers if we lose in the first step of progression but I don't know which is better but recently I am most interested on betting on sectors on table something like Kingspin's modified CPR or betting against last few numbers for example 13, 19 etc.

darrynf

i wouldnt play 35 numbers as you dont have an advantage.

you have to play 36 games without a loss to gain 36, and you will get a loss out of 30 spins often.

dont even think about it with a progression, i have studied this before and it dose not work.

i would cover 10 numbers as you can do this up to 3 times then use a rpogression, if i were to randomly pick numbers but i wouldnt do this.

track your numbers and bet for a new number to come through, most of the time the numbers you cover are below 18 and it makes it easy to use a light progression, i have a very successful system based on this.

though i do 30 spins. though im changing the numbers constantly but you could keep the bet going till one of your numbers hit, should work just as well, after you get a hit you will have to track a new set of numbers.

the new numbers hit just as much as repeats hit so after 2 virtual losses then bet.

pablos

I wrote that it was just a thought and I didn't play this way much and I am more interested in play in the way similar to yours. Recently I read CPR system by Kingspin in which he bet 9 numbers using progression. I thought about something similar, wait x spins, track the numbers than bet 9 unhit numbers with progression.

Today I played few spins with betting 35 numbers and in the third spin I hit one of two left numbers :) Good I won in the second step of progression. I played live casino of course not RNG.

pablos

-