what i know about roulette.

[Zindrod]

Yes, green still wins.

But, positive black numbers aside, I would expect to lose less than pins over a significant sample.

Just playing the devils advocate here for argument sake.

Ok. I'm with you.

[ReDsQuaD]

RedWorm u are full of shit !
 I would not be surprized if the foto in ur avatar is you in reality....
From the things you post....this face fits .....

HHHHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHA

Coming from the person who can't spell. I tell it how it is, if you don't like it, piss off.

James.

[Zindrod]

Coming from the person who can't spell. I tell it how it is, if you don't like it, piss off.

James.

You can only say it as it is if it is correct.

You say that the roulette wheel isn't random. So. What's your method of play. Cannot seem to remember you posting anything in that regard.

Regards
Z

[ReDsQuaD]

You can only say it as it is if it is correct.

You say that the roulette wheel isn't random. So. What's your method of play. Cannot seem to remember you posting anything in that regard.

Regards
Z

Hmm. Ok so what you are saying is, if you have a winning method, you have to declare it?

I don't think so.

People with winning methods do not boast, why would they?

James.

James.

[Mr J]

"People with winning methods do not boast, why would they?" >>> But they could if they wanted to, correct?

Ken

[ReDsQuaD]

Let me explain to alllllllllllllllllllllllllll of you what Roulette is all about with a very simple example:

Let s say that we have a man that holds one little marible in his 1 hand. And this man is letting you deside in which hand the marible is......
After XXX times in the future you will always be EVEN in wins /losses....

Now take the above situation and add this :  IN EVERY X TIMES U WILL HAVE A LOSS BECAUSE THE MARIBLE WILL NOT BE IN ANY OF THE 2 HANDS......

A.N.D    T.H.I.S      I.S    T.H.E      ZZZ.EEE.RRR.OOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this is how simple Roulette is.......

Ps. Playing Straight nums, or splits ,or streets or quarters ,or anythings....the above example apply to all the bets that anyone can bet in roulette

Thank you , you have been a wonderfull but silly audience

What a load of newbie bullshit. All the above just prooved you know ZERO about this game. Your as worse as that other idoit mausunset.

James.

[ReDsQuaD]

"People with winning methods do not boast, why would they?" >>> But they could if they wanted to, correct?

Ken

Look im saying people tend NOT to. I did not say that mate.

James.

[Mr J]

I got it now, thanks.

'do not'
AND
'tend not to'....are two different things.

Ken

[ReDsQuaD]

I got it now, thanks.

'do not'
AND
'tend not to'....are two different things.

Ken

When i said "i did not say that"

I meant i did not say that ALL professional roulette players do not tell people they have a system and consistently win.

Sure there is going to be a few.

Cheers Ken,
James.

[Psolaras]

Hmm. Ok so what you are saying is, if you have a winning method, you have to declare it?

I don't think so.

People with winning methods do not boast, why would they?

James.

James.

ppl with winning methods dont t participate in forums either!!!!

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

ppl with winning methods dont t participate in forums either!!!!

Why??
So, do you think that Federer, Nadal, Phelps, Rossi, Slater, Vettal etc
never talk to anybody or blog or go onto forums,
(this is where you now say something stupid about me comparing myself to these sportspeople).

Maybe those of you who don't REALLY have winning systems
should give up on some of your 'pet' beliefs,
obviously they are either not right or just not working for you.

Glenn.

[gizmotron]

Many of you perceive me as a braggart. I learned that is a worthless adventure during my extreme sports period. Nobody gives a damn. But that doesn't stop people from seeing me as a bragger anyway. That's the only way MauiSunset saw me. He said so.

For years Spike and I kept our secrets. I hinted at things. I was looking for someone to figure it out on there own. I figured it out on my own. Spike figured it out on his own. It stands to reason that others did too. In fact Capt just said that John Patrick figured it out on his own.

But I learned this. I personally taught ten people. And guess what? With a step by step road map they all have difficulties getting very good at this. Spike was right. It takes daily practice to get sharp at these skills. It takes work. Many people will not gain the skills enough to attack the casinos effectively. It won't happen because of human nature. They will not be able to obtain the discipline required to be a winner. If it were easy anyone could do it.

When enough people attack the casino the way I do then the mathboyz will find a person smart enough and willing to work hard enough in order to explain the mathematics of it. Until then it's an unworked problem. Skepticism still makes the very best excuse to not do anything. And that is the current state of these gambling forums. They have 300 years of history on their side and Albert Einstein too. It's a great excuse to do nothing. In fact, I'm sure I'll be able to attack the casinos for years to come. Laziness is just too powerful an incentive. People love to sit on the couch and watch life go by.

[ReDsQuaD]

Hmm. Ok so what you are saying is, if you have a winning method, you have to declare it?

I don't think so.

People with winning methods do not boast, why would they?

James.

James.

ppl with winning methods dont t participate in forums either!!!!

Hey. Thats not quite true, there are a few! I know a few of them and i know for sure there a more that i do not know about.

James.

[pins]

people with winning methods do not boast. they do not exist.

[Mr J]

Same thing with AP, nothing but LIES. I can do this back and fourth thing all night long.

Ken

[Mr J]

-