Like To Have Your Mind Blown?

[gizmotron]

Regarding something said to Gizmotron: "How can you guarantee that Spike can do something you've never seen Spike do much less ANYONE else?">>

Spike - 21-Feb-10 15:27 - "I know Gizmo 'gets it' because he says the right things. He stinks of authenticity, if you will."

Live with it, suffer its aroma!

[cheese]

>>If you FOLLOW the long streak, instead of bet against it and you're flat betting, you can only lose ONCE. >>

This isn't Spike's idea, actually. Its the rule for following streaks, something thats common knowledge. If you're forced to follow streaks, its better than the alternative.

[cheese]

Live with it, suffer its aroma!

I think Spike has said he had a good time making Gizmo believe he was on the right track, I'm sure you read those posts. You aren't the only one who can shovel the baloney, Gizmo.

[gizmotron]

Spike - 23-Feb-10 16:18 - "casinos get a hold of it and freak out a little. Then Roulette gets changed to accommodate their bottom lines.>>

I've said it over and over, Thorp writing that stupid book ruined card counting forever for the people who were already doing it. They begged him not to write it, but his huge ego had to have its day. What did he care, by his own admission he had no intention of ever playing BJ in a casino again.

Taking tests for roulette skill would be just as stupid. Right now the casinos are unwised up chumps. Lets leave them that way.."

[gizmotron]

Spike - 03-Mar-10 17:55 - "dominations in the Odd/Even or High/Low EC's>>>

This is something most people miss. When one side is dominating like red is here, quite often one of the other EC's has a dominating side at the same time. There is so much to watch for, so much to be aware of, I laugh when people ask why I practice. The more you play, the more you see. I don't think there's an end to the depth of it.

You want to know what reading random is? You just got a lesson."

I couldn't have stated this about trends any better. Thanks Spike. I guess this is Spike's worthless crud?

[cheese]

I couldn't have stated this about trends any better.

"When one side is dominating like red is here, quite often one of the other EC's has a dominating side at the same time."

Where is the word trend mentioned?

[cheese]

The flaw in you're thinking, Gizmo, is you obviously think the last number on the wheel you're playing is somehow connected to the previous numbers from that wheel, and if you look real hard, you'll see 'rare events'. If the numbers aren't connected, and they're not, rare events don't exist. Its a mathematical impossibility.

There can be no rare events when dealing with random numbers. There can be no favorable time to bet, how could there be. This isn't Bizzaro World, where everything is the opposite of the real world. If you think there are favorable times to bet, you don't understand random outcomes at all.

[cheese]

To: gizmotron@***.***
Subject: Hey
Date: Mar 28, 2011 6:27 PM
Jesus, Mark, I just heard from ANOTHER guy that you fleeced. He has no clue what it was you're trying to teach, just like the others who contacted me.

How many more will contact Spike that they got fleeced? Time will tell.

[late bet]

i would just like to say that this is a freeking awesome site.  respect to the powers that be. . . . seems to me that its all bout making money and anything else is kinda. . . . irrelevant. . . ! Number mystics, opportunists, romantics, psychics and visionaries.  Seems to me that these guys are always the winners. . . . like that dude who did up his life savings on B/R. . .

[cheese]

Number mystics, opportunists, romantics, psychics and visionaries.  Seems to me that these guys are always the winners. . . .  .

Not always...

[curious]

The Gizmotron Algorithm. It's not built yet. After all, computers are just tools that execute elaborate sets of instructions. Now that would be a BIG DEAL. Until then, I agree with you.

BTW, my mind is not blown yet. When does that happen?

Let me make sure that I understand this.  You are a computer programmer.  You have been on the internet in different roulette forums for years talking about your work in beating roulette.  You have an algorithm on paper, I guess.  Not sure what it means "It's not built yet.  Building the algorithm is a big deal".  So, why not build it?  I work with complex algorithms all the time.  Others on this forum do this also.  I would be willing to help.   Others on this forum would be willing to help also.

So build the software containing the algorithm.  (If that is what you mean when you say "build").  Then we an all test it and publicize the results.  And if you truly can beat roulette in a way that can be measured, you will go down in history as one of the great geniuses.

[gizmotron]

You must have just woken up from your drunken stupor. You missed the memo. It blew up in my face. I had it looking for four things from the past spins and then flipping the bets or not based on wins and losses in the recent past. It didn't work. There's far too many things to consider. Things like this:

Monster List:

Does the doz group continue to single?
Does a bet on the doz group for singles keep losing when tried?
Does the doz group singles break at 4,5,6,7,8 with a global repetition?
Does the doz group have a domination at 80% or better?
Does the doz group have a possible sleeper?
Does start bets on doz group sleepers always lose?
Does one section of the doz group only hit as a single, double?
Is there a global effect evident for any of the above conditions?
Is there a string of singles while there is also a sleeper in the doz group?
Is there any repeating pattern in the doz group?
Is the doz group absent from any formations?
Is there a swarm of doubles in the doz group?
It there a single dozen in the doz group that is dominant 80% or more?
What happened in the last three spins?
Did the very last spin win or lose?
Does a global effect in the doz group also occur in the col group?
Was the last two spins in the doz group single or double?
Was the last two spins in the doz group still a sleeper on one section?
Was the last three spins in the doz group single or double?
Was the last three spins in the doz group still a sleeper on one section?
Is there a streak of lost bets?
Is there a streak of winning bets?
Did I lose the last bet?
Did I win the last bet?
Did I reach my goal on the last bet?

Now do this for the columns group, and for each of the EC's groupings also.
Do it for each spin.

Now make a best guess strategy for all the data gathered above.

[curious]

You must have just woken up from your drunken stupor. You missed the memo. It blew up in my face. I had it looking for four things from the past spins and then flipping the bets or not based on wins and losses in the recent past. It didn't work. There's far too many things to consider...

Here is what you said "The Gizmotron Algorithm. It's not built yet. After all, computers are just tools that execute elaborate sets of instructions. Now that would be a BIG DEAL. Until then, I agree with you."

So, first you claim to have an algorithm which will beat roulette.  But, it is hard to "build".  By the way, this statement makes absolutely no sense to me.  If you have the algorithm written down on paper then we can program it.  Or, if you have the concept written down but not the algorithm, we can write an algorithm to enforce the concept.  There are people on this forum who have the skills to do this.  So, when I call you on this you insult me by saying "You must have just woken up from your drunken stupor.", so you call me a drunk and claim I am stupid.  I don't drink.  Now you claim that the Gizmotron Algorithm does not work.  You made the post that I am quoting where you claim to have the Gizmotron Algorithm lately, so did you build it and it failed in the last few days?

[gizmotron]

Here is what you said "The Gizmotron Algorithm. It's not built yet. After all, computers are just tools that execute elaborate sets of instructions. Now that would be a BIG DEAL. Until then, I agree with you."

So, first you claim to have an algorithm which will beat roulette.  But, it is hard to "build".  By the way, this statement makes absolutely no sense to me.  If you have the algorithm written down on paper then we can program it.  Or, if you have the concept written down but not the algorithm, we can write an algorithm to enforce the concept.  There are people on this forum who have the skills to do this.  So, when I call you on this you insult me by saying "You must have just woken up from your drunken stupor.", so you call me a drunk and claim I am stupid.  I don't drink.  Now you claim that the Gizmotron Algorithm does not work.  You made the post that I am quoting where you claim to have the Gizmotron Algorithm lately, so did you build it and it failed in the last few days?

Don't feed the troll.

[curious]

Don't feed the troll.

So, I am a troll because I ask you to explain what you are talking about in a way that everyone can understand and to stop insulting me and calling me names because I ask for explanations?

This makes me a troll?

[curious]

-